Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Food and Drink
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-26-2011, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,772,037 times
Reputation: 49248

Advertisements

and I am tired of the nanny states thank you!!! I see nothing wrong with the old Micky D's Happy meals once in awhile. If parents are going to take their kids to places like Micky D's weekly or more, this simple change will make no difference. They will continue to give their kids junk food.

Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-26-2011, 08:49 PM
 
16,394 posts, read 30,292,455 times
Reputation: 25502
Quote:
Originally Posted by findinghope View Post
good idea, except i am little skeptical about apples that don't turn brown...
You treat the apples with a certain chemical ... citric acid.

If you do it at home, you dip the apples in either orange juice or lemon juice and they do not turn brown for a long while.

A lesson learned my first day in a commercial kitchen ... before making 20# of waldorf salad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2011, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Lost in Space
348 posts, read 850,195 times
Reputation: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
and I am tired of the nanny states thank you!!! I see nothing wrong with the old Micky D's Happy meals once in awhile. If parents are going to take their kids to places like Micky D's weekly or more, this simple change will make no difference. They will continue to give their kids junk food.

Nita
It isn't a nanny "state" if a corporation makes a decision to add some healthier food options to its menu.

Kids (and Americans in general) continue to get fatter and unhealthier. While I think McDonald's is gross, perhaps those kids who are fed a steady diet of fast food because of inept, lazy, or uneducated parents, will get a meal with some nutritional benefits. If McDonalds chooses to do so, that's it's right, and is a small but positive step in the right direction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 05:01 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,772,037 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redsox1972 View Post
It isn't a nanny "state" if a corporation makes a decision to add some healthier food options to its menu.

Kids (and Americans in general) continue to get fatter and unhealthier. While I think McDonald's is gross, perhaps those kids who are fed a steady diet of fast food because of inept, lazy, or uneducated parents, will get a meal with some nutritional benefits. If McDonalds chooses to do so, that's it's right, and is a small but positive step in the right direction.
but it is being pressured by "nanny State" It started with cities forcing them to do so, like San Francisco. I agree about kids eating junk food because parents are either too lazy or uneducated to know good nutrician, but as a foods and nutrician specialist (in my younger years) and having taught classes I know this will make almost no difference and I just think we are getting carried away with deciding what others should do. But, I will add, I guess this isn't the place for discussing this, so I will not say anything more on the subject.

Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 08:52 AM
 
Location: DFW
12,229 posts, read 21,511,926 times
Reputation: 33267
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
but it is being pressured by "nanny State" It started with cities forcing them to do so, like San Francisco. I agree about kids eating junk food because parents are either too lazy or uneducated to know good nutrician, but as a foods and nutrician specialist (in my younger years) and having taught classes I know this will make almost no difference and I just think we are getting carried away with deciding what others should do. But, I will add, I guess this isn't the place for discussing this, so I will not say anything more on the subject.

Nita
I agree 100%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Heading to the NW, 4 sure.
4,468 posts, read 8,006,141 times
Reputation: 8743
I think it's a darn good idea. Kids get enough "junk food" as is.
Good for Mickey D.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Orlando, Florida
43,854 posts, read 51,200,867 times
Reputation: 58749
Well great, now I'll have to order extra fries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Charlotte county, Florida
4,196 posts, read 6,426,097 times
Reputation: 12287
I have been ordering happy meals for my Neice and Nephew like this forever, one gets fries the other apples and they divy the two.
Luckily they are kind of weird kids, they prefer fruits over junk most of the time...

Those apples do come with a side of caramel type stuff for dipping..
So they are dropping some grease and still keeping the highly processed caramel like sauce..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 09:49 AM
 
9,846 posts, read 22,682,121 times
Reputation: 7738
I believe it said the caramel sauce was going away.

While happy meals might not be healthy, how often do most kids get them?

I just don't like private industry being forced into things by government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2011, 09:50 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,711,393 times
Reputation: 24590
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
reducing the french fry portion by more than half and automatically adding apples to the popular children's meals, after coming under pressure from consumer groups to provide healthier fare.
so you are cutting 115 calories of french fries and replacing that with 100 calories of apples with caramel sauce? net benefit 15 calories. makes no difference for a kid and an apple is no more nutritious than french fries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Food and Drink

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top