Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Ford and Lincoln
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2014, 12:52 PM
 
5,481 posts, read 8,585,512 times
Reputation: 8284

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller88 View Post
That would be fun. Not a lot of turbo lag and a flat torque curve on the ecoboosters!




I don't hear the resemblance? If it sounded like a Rogue the awkward CVT would be lugging it around at 1000RPM then randomly bouncing it off the rev limiter :P
Honest question. If both had the same pricetag (the GT and 4cyl ecoboost), would you choose the ecoboost over the GT?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2014, 01:30 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
5,994 posts, read 20,107,650 times
Reputation: 4079
Quote:
Originally Posted by deevel79 View Post
Honest question. If both had the same pricetag (the GT and 4cyl ecoboost), would you choose the ecoboost over the GT?
Stock for stock just about anyone would go with the GT at the same price (it's a silly question given their capabilities). The price difference is where it gets tricky because you can likely build a car that is faster than the GT for less money. Or like current V6 buyers, they will find that the stock EB is plenty fast for their needs because they aren't entering a nut swinging competition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2014, 01:33 PM
 
865 posts, read 2,163,309 times
Reputation: 953
Quote:
Originally Posted by deevel79 View Post
Honest question. If both had the same pricetag (the GT and 4cyl ecoboost), would you choose the ecoboost over the GT?
I would get the turbo 4.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2014, 01:46 PM
 
5,481 posts, read 8,585,512 times
Reputation: 8284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller88 View Post
I would get the turbo 4.
And your reason for choosing the turbo 4 over the v8?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2014, 01:46 PM
 
Location: OH>IL>CO>CT
7,520 posts, read 13,639,903 times
Reputation: 11914
What's the big deal ?? My stock 2008 Fusion 3.0 makes more noise that that when pushed.

And nowhere near my SIL's 2008 Mustang GT 4.2 stock except for ECU re-program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2014, 01:53 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
5,251 posts, read 14,259,380 times
Reputation: 8231
Quote:
Originally Posted by deevel79 View Post
And your reason for choosing the turbo 4 over the v8?
Probably just to get a reaction out of you. What you asked was a silly question any way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2014, 02:01 PM
 
5,481 posts, read 8,585,512 times
Reputation: 8284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Me007gold View Post
Probably just to get a reaction out of you. What you asked was a silly question any way.
How was it a silly question? Some people have been raving about the new turbo 4 ecoboost. I would just like to know why those who prefer it over the v8 do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2014, 02:51 PM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,625 posts, read 12,302,242 times
Reputation: 5233
At elevation like here at 5000' the turbo may actually have more power. I'm a diehard only drive V8's and am considering the EB in my next F150. I makes up for the loss of pressure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2014, 03:17 PM
 
865 posts, read 2,163,309 times
Reputation: 953
Quote:
Originally Posted by deevel79 View Post
And your reason for choosing the turbo 4 over the v8?

It's different that what we traditionally see in these cars. Having driven an Ecoboost 4 cylinder, I love the low end torque of them too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2014, 04:09 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, Tx
8,238 posts, read 10,733,056 times
Reputation: 10224
They'll sell the hell out of these but talk about blasphemy. If it isnt going to come with a V8 they should have at least used the Ecoboost V6 (I know why it has a 4cyl - but still). Actually, I DONT know why they used a 4cyl. They cant get 300hp and 30mpg out of a NA V6? Even GM can do that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Ford and Lincoln

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top