Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-11-2013, 04:43 PM
 
375 posts, read 800,627 times
Reputation: 330
Is Mississippi just that backwards? I know most of the states around it aren't great except for Tennessee, but it seems as if Mississippi doesn't really have a lot going for it. Economically it isn't the best, and in education and health care it's terrible. Even with similar problems in other Southern states, why does Mississippi still struggle?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-11-2013, 08:50 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,319,530 times
Reputation: 13298
Mississippi isn't as backwards as you'd think. Jackson is like most other metro areas it's size, although white flight there has been astronomical. I think the city is around 80% black. The coast is anything like inland Mississippi, far removed. The suburbs of Memphis are pretty healthy, and some of it's small towns are quite charming.

I don't why it's in the state it is in though. It's as if nothing ever grows or prospers almost. They didn't receive any kind of large port when the lines were drawn, they got the dirty part of the gulf coast, the casinos seemed to have helped the coast, not sure about Tunica and the Memphis area.

The resistance to change might be it's own death note.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2013, 08:57 PM
 
Location: Savannah GA
13,709 posts, read 21,929,063 times
Reputation: 10227
IMO, the main reason why Mississippi lags is because it is very lack in natural resources. It has a very small coastline, but no major port, and most of the rest of the state is dominated by the Delta. Very rich farmland, and that's about it. There's no gas or oil, no minerals for mining, no mountains for recreation. It's a very bland state geographically, perhaps no more bland than Nebraska or Kansas. But then, those states don't have the stigma of racism, poverty and negative history that Mississippi has.

An effective state leadership should have been able to attract at least a decent-size manufacturing sector by now, but the other problems that plague Mississippi are just too huge to overcome. For one, recruiting new business requires money. And that's just something Mississippi doesn't have a lot of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2013, 09:08 PM
 
66 posts, read 129,745 times
Reputation: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbay33 View Post
Is Mississippi just that backwards? I know most of the states around it aren't great except for Tennessee, but it seems as if Mississippi doesn't really have a lot going for it. Economically it isn't the best, and in education and health care it's terrible. Even with similar problems in other Southern states, why does Mississippi still struggle?
Poor education and quality of life. It's the same reason Oklahoma and to an extent Alabama has also missed out on the Southern population boom. They just aren't good places to live. Tennessee, Georgia, North Carolina, and Kentucky have modern cities that offer a high quality of life while still offering a low cost of living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2013, 09:15 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,319,530 times
Reputation: 13298
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityBrightLights View Post
Poor education and quality of life. It's the same reason Oklahoma and to an extent Alabama has also missed out on the Southern population boom. They just aren't good places to live. Tennessee, Georgia, North Carolina, and Kentucky have modern cities that offer a high quality of life while still offering a low cost of living.
lol really?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2013, 09:29 PM
 
Location: Savannah GA
13,709 posts, read 21,929,063 times
Reputation: 10227
Quote:
Originally Posted by annie_himself View Post
lol really?
Consider the source ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2013, 09:29 PM
 
375 posts, read 800,627 times
Reputation: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newsboy View Post
IMO, the main reason why Mississippi lags is because it is very lack in natural resources. It has a very small coastline, but no major port, and most of the rest of the state is dominated by the Delta. Very rich farmland, and that's about it. There's no gas or oil, no minerals for mining, no mountains for recreation. It's a very bland state geographically, perhaps no more bland than Nebraska or Kansas. But then, those states don't have the stigma of racism, poverty and negative history that Mississippi has.

An effective state leadership should have been able to attract at least a decent-size manufacturing sector by now, but the other problems that plague Mississippi are just too huge to overcome. For one, recruiting new business requires money. And that's just something Mississippi doesn't have a lot of.
That's too bad. One of my good friends actually went to grad school down at Southern Miss, and he never really had an answer for me. Granted he loves it down there. I'm just surprised though they haven't been able to do something to attract more people. I know it can't be that bad. Coming from Nebraska, i'd say the two states are kind of similar other than their regions (both are flat, both don't really have natural resources). The thing that gets me though is education. Why is it so bad? Nebraska's education is a little better than average, and for all the insults it gets about teaching creationism, I don't think Kansas is terrible in education. Iowa is similar too and they probably have the best educational system in the country. I know part of it is southern culture and poverty, but you'd think they'd want to invest in education if they don't have much else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2013, 09:31 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,441,267 times
Reputation: 55562
parts of miss are doing well. around oxford. mostly escape from the new detroit, memphis.
compared to louisiana mississippi looks rich.
its all relative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2013, 09:33 PM
 
375 posts, read 800,627 times
Reputation: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityBrightLights View Post
Poor education and quality of life. It's the same reason Oklahoma and to an extent Alabama has also missed out on the Southern population boom. They just aren't good places to live. Tennessee, Georgia, North Carolina, and Kentucky have modern cities that offer a high quality of life while still offering a low cost of living.
Is Oklahoma really that bad? OKC seems like a decent city. I can see rural oklahoma being pretty bad, but OKC and Tulsa can't be doing too terrible. The cities thing makes sense. If a state has a thriving main city it does well. Honestly, Nebraska does well because Omaha and Lincoln do well. Kansas does okay because of the KC suburbs, though Wichita I hear isn't that great economically. Jackson just doesn't seem like a very influential city or economically well off. At least Alabama has Birmingham and Mobile
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2013, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Savannah GA
13,709 posts, read 21,929,063 times
Reputation: 10227
Also, I don't think many people realize how black (37.4 percent) and impoverished (21.6 percent) Mississippi really is. Mississippi has a HUGE underclass for a state so small, and that's really almost impossible to overcome. And as I said before, there's very little wealth or natural resources in the state to offset that poverty.

Sure, Georgia is over 30 percent black as well, but Georgia's AA population is better educated, heavily middle class to even uber-rich upper class, and mostly professional. There's no black middle class in Mississippi, relatively speaking. To this day, the majority of black families live on rural farms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top