Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-11-2010, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Live in VA, Work in MD, Play in DC
699 posts, read 2,236,555 times
Reputation: 276

Advertisements

I read in another thread a poster speculating on whether or not sunbelt cities are sustainable due to strains on infrastructure (specifically transportation).

I thought about the large amount of growth that sunbelt cities have undergone the past few decades. And even with all that growth, the sunbelt cities still have large amounts of cheap land surrounding them.

But often times the more wealth that is accumulated within an area, the larger the increases in costs of all types. The more people there are, the more they expect certain amenities and services provided by the local governments, which in turn raises taxes. People are pushed out further and further out which will most likely further strain the area's infrastructure even more which would increase costs again.

The sunbelt cities boasts a great COL, which is a huge draw to many of the people migrating to them. But will that rise dramatically in the next few decades and become more even with the West and East coasts? Increase moderately? Or will their COL maintain their current status?

Last edited by tenken627; 08-11-2010 at 02:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-11-2010, 02:47 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,921,303 times
Reputation: 7976
I would suspect some moderate growth (or a slowingf of the current growth rate in the larger metros), there is still much cheap land but the infrastructure will get more costly and desire to live closer to the core will also drive up costs.

To me two factors will determine the continued growth, one are they able to continue to attract the new businesses/jobs to support the growth and two how expensive the new infrastructure is coupled with the cost to maintain the aging infrastructure. States like TX are very pro business so that is helpful. A hiccup in growth also puts their construction at the risk of unemployment so it will be interesting to see how it plays out.

I honestly can see some softening in the larger areas and maybe excelerated growth in the smaller areas, maybe other areas of texas and places like RDU and Charlotte will speed up their growth with more cheap land closer to the core, NC is also pretty business friendly, not as much as TX though
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Somewhere in the universe
2,155 posts, read 4,581,318 times
Reputation: 1470
I think in the future Austin, Dallas, and maybe Atlanta will be very expensive. Houston I think will stay fairly cheap or get more moderate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Live in VA, Work in MD, Play in DC
699 posts, read 2,236,555 times
Reputation: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
I would suspect some moderate growth, there is still much cheap land but the infrastructure will get more costly and desire to live closer to the core will also drive up costs.

To me two factors will determine the continued growth, one are they able to continue to attract the new businesses/jobs to support the growth and two how expensive the new infrastructure is coupled with the cost to maintain the aging infrastructure. States like TX are very pro business so that is helpful. A hiccup in growth also puts their construction at the risk of unemployment so it will be interesting to see how it plays out.

I honestly can see some softening in the larger areas and maybe excelerated growth in the smaller areas, maybe other of texas and places like RDU and Charlotte will speed up their growth with more cheap land closer to the core, NC is also pretty business friendly, not as much as TX though

I do think that the sunbelt area as a whole will continue to grow no matter what.

I was specifically wondering about the COL in the cities and the immediate areas around them, and not the actual growth itself.


I do know that the sunbelt cities are attracting young, well-educated professionals and these types of people are known to greatly increase costs for everyone else. Affluent, and with a willingness to spend, they can outbid many others and drive up market value. It's no secret that the most well-educated places all over the world usually cost much more than other areas. A large upper-middle class can skyrocket home values throughout the whole city moreso than a handful of millionaires/billionaires can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 03:36 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,921,303 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by tenken627 View Post
I do think that the sunbelt area as a whole will continue to grow no matter what.

I was specifically wondering about the COL in the cities and the immediate areas around them, and not the actual growth itself.


I do know that the sunbelt cities are attracting young, well-educated professionals but these types of people are known to greatly increase costs for everyone else. Affluent, and with a willingness to spend, they can outbid many others and drive up market value. It's no secret that the most well-educated places all over the world usually cost much more than other areas. A large upper-middle class can skyrocket home values throughout the whole city moreso than a handful of millionaires/billionaires can.

Understood and agree to a certain extent, but the biggest drivers on COL are real estate and taxes, both resultant from development and cost there of coupled with increased values associated with a desire to live in place and the relative supply and demand
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Live in VA, Work in MD, Play in DC
699 posts, read 2,236,555 times
Reputation: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Understood and agree to a certain extent, but the biggest drivers on COL are real estate and taxes, both resultant from development and cost there of coupled with increased values associated with a desire to live in place and the relative supply and demand
Even if homes are springing in large amounts outwards, the costs of homes in the most accessible areas to employment and recreation should jump even higher like you say. Location, location location. Increase in development on outwards cheap land should theoretically increase home prices inwards (as long as there is still overall growth).

But eventually there is a strain on infrastructure from building outwards so much. While this may not halt growth, it will have a great impact on prices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 03:53 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,921,303 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by tenken627 View Post
Even if homes are springing in large amounts outwards, the costs of homes in the most accessible areas to employment and recreation should jump even higher. Location, location location. Increase in development on outwards cheap land should theoretically increase home prices inwards (as long as there is still overall growth).

Also agree - unless they continue to attract employers and job centers further out, thought at some distances to mjor amenities and things of cultural significance also make this desireable for certain types of employers, then you likely attract lessor paying jobs like call centers etc.

I do agree, there will be continued infill and this will drive up costs, both because some will require razing of existing infrastructure and/or premiums on locations. The lower COL is not sustainable long term in the current capacity
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Live in VA, Work in MD, Play in DC
699 posts, read 2,236,555 times
Reputation: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovely95 View Post
I think in the future Austin, Dallas, and maybe Atlanta will be very expensive. Houston I think will stay fairly cheap or get more moderate.
Why do you think Houston will stay relatively cheap while Austin, Dallas, and Atlanta become expensive?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Live in VA, Work in MD, Play in DC
699 posts, read 2,236,555 times
Reputation: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Also agree - unless they continue to attract employers and job centers further out, thought at some distances to mjor amenities and things of cultural significance also make this desireable for certain types of employers, then you likely attract lessor paying jobs like call centers etc.

I do agree, there will be continued infill and this will drive up costs, both because some will require razing of existing infrastructure and/or premiums on locations. The lower COL is not sustainable long term in the current capacity
I think so too. Especially since most of the sunbelt cities are now working on their downtowns (with people actually wanting to go downtown in the future), the surrounding area should increase property values (and the land value itself) and should have a ripple effect outwards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2010, 04:37 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,921,303 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by tenken627 View Post
I think so too. Especially since most of the sunbelt cities are now working on their downtowns (with people actually wanting to go downtown in the future), the surrounding area should increase property values (and the land value itself) and should have a ripple effect outwards.

Not to mention the general US economy and real estate market is likely also keeping all costs down. It appears Atlanta started to experience creeping real estate prices already before the whole market crashed, I also read that the areas inside the Houston beltway were also creeping at a much faster rate than the overall metro, so some signs are already there. But all in all I think it will help the metros, Atlanta again has had some very interesting developments in their core over the last ten years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top