Is torture always wrong, even if the person is 100% evil?
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sinking to their level would be more like torturing an innocent person.
I fundamentally disagree. Torture IS evil. So if you do torture you do evil, regardless of whether or not the victim of your torture was innocent or not - that is totally irrelevant.
I know that the idea of torture for many is a contentious subject, but even if it's not for information gathering. simply to make a very horrible and evil person suffer to death, is it wrong? Let me put it this way: Let's take some of the most unanimously considered evil people to have ever existed; Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Osama Bin Laden. Say at the time they were alive they met their end by being captured and brutally tortured in the worst ways possible for weeks, or even months, then finally died. Considering just how unspeakably evil we all know the aforementioned were, would you still consider it wrong to have done to them? Would you honestly feel bad for them?
Yes. Torture is always wrong. It does not yield reliable information, either.
I don't believe in the death penalty, and I sure as hell don't believe in torture.
Since this is no longer being debated per the guidelines the topic is being closed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.