Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-07-2017, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
10,930 posts, read 11,723,439 times
Reputation: 13170

Advertisements

There have historically been 2 reasons for torture: as punishment, or to obtain confession (or other infromation).

The most recent debates focus on the latter reason: does punishment work as a means of gathering information?

The issue of punishing evil deeds through torture has two sides, and which side wins depends on where you live.

 
Old 11-07-2017, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,025 posts, read 14,201,797 times
Reputation: 16747
The simple answer : torture is always bad.
Using evil to defeat evil, only results in a victory for evil.
 
Old 11-07-2017, 01:33 PM
 
6,824 posts, read 10,518,651 times
Reputation: 8392
Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangman66 View Post
Sinking to their level would be more like torturing an innocent person.
I fundamentally disagree. Torture IS evil. So if you do torture you do evil, regardless of whether or not the victim of your torture was innocent or not - that is totally irrelevant.
 
Old 11-07-2017, 02:02 PM
 
Location: The New England part of Ohio
24,120 posts, read 32,468,260 times
Reputation: 68357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandono View Post
I know that the idea of torture for many is a contentious subject, but even if it's not for information gathering. simply to make a very horrible and evil person suffer to death, is it wrong? Let me put it this way: Let's take some of the most unanimously considered evil people to have ever existed; Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Osama Bin Laden. Say at the time they were alive they met their end by being captured and brutally tortured in the worst ways possible for weeks, or even months, then finally died. Considering just how unspeakably evil we all know the aforementioned were, would you still consider it wrong to have done to them? Would you honestly feel bad for them?
Yes. Torture is always wrong. It does not yield reliable information, either.

I don't believe in the death penalty, and I sure as hell don't believe in torture.
 
Old 11-07-2017, 09:40 PM
 
17,574 posts, read 13,350,601 times
Reputation: 33013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulsker 1856 View Post
They fact that you would find it emotionally satisfying to cause intense suffering isn't quantifying anything.

But we'll mark you down as a YES for torture for no reason other than your own amusement...
Believe me, it is far from amusement! And no, it would not be torture for no reason
 
Old 11-10-2017, 06:29 AM
 
Location: Louisville
5,296 posts, read 6,063,888 times
Reputation: 9628
Since this is no longer being debated per the guidelines the topic is being closed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top