Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2010, 07:13 AM
 
1,719 posts, read 4,183,104 times
Reputation: 1299

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
I expect to be collecting a pension and social security in the near future and continue to do so for 20 to 30 years. I have funded SS for WW2 veterans and I expect the younger folk to support this Vietnam veteran.
There aren't enough young people to support you baby boomers. The demographics of the country have changed. The politicians who enacted all of these programs were short-sighted. They thought that the population would be forever increasing and able to sustain these entitlement programs.

The only way to avoid insolvency is to lower governmental spending and raise taxes. I ask any of you members of the older generations to look at the cold hard numbers of the fiscal mess that we face in the future, realize the threat, and make an effort to support legislation that will lower your benefits. If you don't then you will destroy this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2010, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,799,372 times
Reputation: 24863
What do you mean the population is not growing. The population of the US was about 250 million when I started working and is now over 300 million. AFAIK even illegals have to pay SS tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2010, 01:46 PM
 
1,719 posts, read 4,183,104 times
Reputation: 1299
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
What do you mean the population is not growing. The population of the US was about 250 million when I started working and is now over 300 million. AFAIK even illegals have to pay SS tax.
The population is not growing enough and in the right demographic ways in order to adequately support Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. The Baby Boomers are numerous enough that they will put a massive strain on the system as it is currently set up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 10:18 AM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,208,847 times
Reputation: 5481
I am 23 and I am planning on not having any money from social security at retirement. Anyone under 30 who thinks they will get a dime out of that (failing) system is foolish.

All money I contribute to social security is money I am sure I will never see again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 12:27 PM
 
1,719 posts, read 4,183,104 times
Reputation: 1299
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
I am 23 and I am planning on not having any money from social security at retirement. Anyone under 30 who thinks they will get a dime out of that (failing) system is foolish.

All money I contribute to social security is money I am sure I will never see again.
We'll see some money, but definately not 100% of promised benefits. More like 60% probably. We will also be double-taxed by having to pay normal S.S. taxes and by paying back all of the money that has been looted out of the trust fund over the years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 02:10 AM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,970,454 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
What do you mean the population is not growing. The population of the US was about 250 million when I started working and is now over 300 million. AFAIK even illegals have to pay SS tax.
It is growing. But much of that growth has come from increases in life expectancy. 30 years ago, people died sooner than they do today, so the population today is higher than it would have been if that variable had been held constant.

The Baby Boomers did not have that many kids, so there are not as many young working people paying into the SS system to keep it solvent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 02:12 AM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,970,454 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
It is a FLAT TAX, except for the rich, and the money goes to the General Fund. I see no problem with them living within the minimums and maximums set by law.
That's because you're not the one paying for it.

As I asked in my original post....what are YOU personally willing to give up or pay more for????

Endless fighting each other about shifting the costs or taking benefits from the other guy will lead to financial collapse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 06:31 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,799,372 times
Reputation: 24863
We imported other people's children to make up for our decreased birth rate. As I said applying the tax to all income from all sources without any cap will make up the deficit for another generation or two. Then the country can figure out how to stop having imperial wars and importing so much oil. Just the savings from these follies could pay for SS, Medicare and UHC forever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 08:45 AM
 
12,022 posts, read 11,577,118 times
Reputation: 11136
"I am 23 and I am planning on not having any money from social security at retirement."

If they cut benefits by 20 percent after around 2040, the program would be self-sustaining based on their current models.

The politicians want the public to give up on Social Security because they're raiding the funds for other programs. When they cut benefits and raise taxes to save Social Security yet again, the surplus funds aren't going into Social Security. The politicians will spend the money on other programs that will get them reelected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 09:26 AM
 
1,719 posts, read 4,183,104 times
Reputation: 1299
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Then the country can figure out how to stop having imperial wars and importing so much oil. Just the savings from these follies could pay for SS, Medicare and UHC forever.
We've spent almost one trillion on Iraq and Afghanistan all together. The unfunded liabilities of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are projected to be over 50 trillion. Stopping all military action will save us some money, but nowhere near the amount we need to sustain all three of those programs as they currently exist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top