Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Hobbies and Recreation > Guns and Hunting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-21-2018, 06:09 PM
 
Location: NW Nevada
18,160 posts, read 15,628,539 times
Reputation: 17150

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dd714 View Post
The ATF don't full around. If he had a gun collection (A modest one it sounds like) he should have known better than to possess an automatic weapon. This weapon was illegal to possess without the proper licenses when he purchased it, and still illegal now. Why the scratched off serial number? Likely it was stolen (not by him, but by the seller), maybe from a military armory, maybe he knew this when he purchased it.

On that note, I have no sympathy. However, the sentence was pretty severe. I wonder why his residence was raided (another article said he was caught with marijuana as well, but that might be due to a medical reason as his wife just died).
In the early 70s a military base near here had 20 M14s stolen. It was Marine sentries that did it.


They told the FBI and ATF that they had buried them in the desert but they were not where they said they were. A year later one of the rifles was recovered...in Canada. 1 of 20. I almost have to wonder if this guys rifle was one of the other 19. It's quite possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-21-2018, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,376 posts, read 1,367,309 times
Reputation: 1395
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
This is a federal issue. Violation of the NFA ‘34 or GCA ‘68. The state where it occurred is pretty much irrelevant.
Ah yes, I missed that. It's a federal offense alright.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2018, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Metro Seattle Area - Born and Raised
4,905 posts, read 2,057,413 times
Reputation: 8660
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
There is no license required to own a fully automatic weapon. This is a common misconception.
TaxPhd, no disrespect meant, but anybody is stupid enough to listen to what you said, they will and rightly so, up in a federal prison... Period... End of story.

Unless you have the laws covering the NFA and all updates, which shows at following this federal law is only an option or even a minor misconception of said law. Simply ask all the dumb@zzes who are or have been locked up for failing to pay thier federal taxes AFTER some dumb@zz convicted the that it's a misconception about you HAVING to pay your taxes or any other federal law... Again... Period.

Please be a responsible gun owner and discard what Taxphd said!! And no, it's not about being sheep or anything that stupid, it's about enjoying your own freedom and staying out of any court system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2018, 09:42 AM
 
10,755 posts, read 5,672,124 times
Reputation: 10879
Quote:
Originally Posted by bergun View Post
TaxPhd, no disrespect meant, but anybody is stupid enough to listen to what you said, they will and rightly so, up in a federal prison... Period... End of story.

Unless you have the laws covering the NFA and all updates, which shows at following this federal law is only an option or even a minor misconception of said law. Simply ask all the dumb@zzes who are or have been locked up for failing to pay thier federal taxes AFTER some dumb@zz convicted the that it's a misconception about you HAVING to pay your taxes or any other federal law... Again... Period.

Please be a responsible gun owner and discard what Taxphd said!! And no, it's not about being sheep or anything that stupid, it's about enjoying your own freedom and staying out of any court system.
You must have missed my follow up where I addressed this issue. Here it is again:

Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
What is commonly called a “class 3 license” is actually a type 3 SOT which is an add on to a class 1 dealers license. The type 3 SOT allows a dealer in firearms to deal in NFA items. It is a requirement for a dealer, but not for a non-dealer that wants to own an NFA item. A non-dealer has some minor hoops to jump through to buy an NFA item, but no special license is required.
If you believe that I am incorrect, then by all means, educate us, and explain precisely what “license” one must possess in order to own a full auto weapon.

I’ll wait while you do your research. . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2018, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Top of the South, NZ
22,216 posts, read 21,676,363 times
Reputation: 7608
Wow! -America just sounds like such a crazy police state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2018, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,579,444 times
Reputation: 25802
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
You must have missed my follow up where I addressed this issue. Here it is again:



If you believe that I am incorrect, then by all means, educate us, and explain precisely what “license” one must possess in order to own a full auto weapon.

I’ll wait while you do your research. . .
Semantics. It requires a TAX STAMP, a $200 fee, and an EXTENSIVE background check much more thorough, and time consuming than most "licenses" including a driver's license, and in my State, an LTCF (License to carry a firearm). In addition due to the 1986 ban on new full auto rifles, their cost is $15K and UP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2018, 01:59 PM
 
10,755 posts, read 5,672,124 times
Reputation: 10879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
Semantics.
Semantics? Hardly. The claim that a special license is required to own an NFA item is simply false. Untrue. Incorrect. There is not even a small part of that claim that is accurate. And the discussion is important when the topic is the legal requirements for firearm ownership, especially when discussing NFA items, as the downside for non-compliance is potentially huge.

Quote:
It requires a TAX STAMP, a $200 fee, and an EXTENSIVE background check much more thorough, and time consuming than most "licenses" including a driver's license, and in my State, an LTCF (License to carry a firearm).
Attempting to equate a tax stamp to a license is just silly. The tax stamp isn't a license. It isn't "permission" nor "authorization" to own the NFA item. It is simply evidence that the transfer tax has been paid. That's it. Nothing more.

Quote:
In addition due to the 1986 ban on new full auto rifles, their cost is $15K and UP.
The cost of transferable full autos is irrelevant to a discussion about the legal requirements for ownership. And there are plenty available for under $10K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2018, 02:01 PM
 
10,755 posts, read 5,672,124 times
Reputation: 10879
Quote:
Originally Posted by bergun View Post
TaxPhd, no disrespect meant, but anybody is stupid enough to listen to what you said, they will and rightly so, up in a federal prison... Period... End of story.

Unless you have the laws covering the NFA and all updates, which shows at following this federal law is only an option or even a minor misconception of said law. Simply ask all the dumb@zzes who are or have been locked up for failing to pay thier federal taxes AFTER some dumb@zz convicted the that it's a misconception about you HAVING to pay your taxes or any other federal law... Again... Period.

Please be a responsible gun owner and discard what Taxphd said!! And no, it's not about being sheep or anything that stupid, it's about enjoying your own freedom and staying out of any court system.

Still waiting to hear what kind of license is required. . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2018, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,231 posts, read 18,579,444 times
Reputation: 25802
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaxPhd View Post
Semantics? Hardly. The claim that a special license is required to own an NFA item is simply false. Untrue. Incorrect. There is not even a small part of that claim that is accurate. And the discussion is important when the topic is the legal requirements for firearm ownership, especially when discussing NFA items, as the downside for non-compliance is potentially huge.

Attempting to equate a tax stamp to a license is just silly. The tax stamp isn't a license. It isn't "permission" nor "authorization" to own the NFA item. It is simply evidence that the transfer tax has been paid. That's it. Nothing more.

The cost of transferable full autos is irrelevant to a discussion about the legal requirements for ownership. And there are plenty available for under $10K.
Try to own a full auto weapon without the Tax Stamp which requires a background check, and clean record and see what happens. It may not be called a license, but it certainly requires de facto government permission to own one. Owning any NFA items also opens you up to inspection by the BATFE, any time they want. No due process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2018, 02:23 PM
 
10,755 posts, read 5,672,124 times
Reputation: 10879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
Try to own a full auto weapon without the Tax Stamp which requires a background check, and clean record and see what happens. It may not be called a license, but it certainly requires de facto government permission to own one.
You misunderstand the purpose of the Stamp.

Again, the stamp is ONLY evidence that the transfer tax is paid. It isn't called a license because it ISN'T a license. The Form 4 is the registration and the "permission" to own the item. The Form 4 isn't called a license because it ISN'T a license. NO LICENSE IS REQUIRED TO OWN AN NFA ITEM. Period.

Quote:
Owning any NFA items also opens you up to inspection by the BATFE, any time they want. No due process.
And you are completely, 100% incorrect about this. You really ought to study up on the laws before spouting off false information. It makes you look rather silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Hobbies and Recreation > Guns and Hunting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top