Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Health Insurance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-26-2017, 11:39 AM
 
3,613 posts, read 4,118,813 times
Reputation: 5008

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WouldLoveTo View Post
This is a little more complicated now with the penalties, but I don't think it's not a direct correlation. i.e. if I pay $3000 in premiums I don't necessarily lower my taxes by $3000. I just tried to delete the 1095 form from my 2015 return but of course that adds penalties so it's hard to see. There was only a $1000 difference in my total tax though, which was about 1/3 of my total premiums.

Also, I think I used to be able to deduct my premiums on Schedule C but that has changed too. I put them in and the software boots it over to another portion of the return. I'm not at a machine where I can bring up my old returns so don't quote me on that lol



I can't imagine the luxury of a $400 deductible!!
I realize it is not a dollar for dollar deduction, however if your premiums are reduced by $1000, that is still a significant savings and your $250/month premium now is $166/month....using your example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2017, 05:34 PM
 
Location: Texas
3,251 posts, read 2,554,212 times
Reputation: 3127
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChessieMom View Post
You really have it made. I cannot imagine the luxury of not paying premiums.
To be fair, I do pay union dues and some people try to equate dues to a premium, but there are some differences.

About $45 in monthly dues, and working assessments that are automatically drawn out of my check that equate to roughly $200 if I work 40 hour a week all month. So let's round it up to $250 in dues.

The more I work, the more assessments (AKA "working dues") are drawn out because it's 4% of my wage. Lower wage workers pay about 2.5% of their wages in assessments.

It is not the same as a premium though, because even if I were be laid off for an entire month (I've been laid off for a total of 4 weeks spread out over 4 years), then my dues for that month would only be the monthly membership dues of $45, my coverage is not affected in any way.

It's also not the same as a premium because I have added my spouse, then our first child, then our second child and my dues do not go up.

Nothing is free though, right?

We have given up raises to maintain this very good coverage, and being in a trade that carries risk of injury and death, and having a family, most members believe it is worth it.

I wish more people had access to plans like we have, it really bothers me when I hear of good people struggling to maintain even high deductible plans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2017, 05:38 PM
 
6,589 posts, read 4,977,963 times
Reputation: 8046
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwerty View Post
I realize it is not a dollar for dollar deduction, however if your premiums are reduced by $1000, that is still a significant savings and your $250/month premium now is $166/month....using your example.
Except too bad my premiums weren't $250! lol I just tossed the $3000 figure out there because it was a nice round number.

Anyway, glad to know I passed Accounting 101. I don't always so was hesitant so say anything. Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2017, 08:21 AM
 
3,613 posts, read 4,118,813 times
Reputation: 5008
Quote:
Originally Posted by WouldLoveTo View Post
Except too bad my premiums weren't $250! lol I just tossed the $3000 figure out there because it was a nice round number.

Anyway, glad to know I passed Accounting 101. I don't always so was hesitant so say anything. Thanks!
I know you were just tossing out a number, but there are many business owners here that fail to report that tax savings and complain endlessly how much they pay, but never include that reduction for the tax savings and I was just pointing that out.

Also, the business owners keep looking at these premiums as a personal expense and not a business expense and then come here and complain that the w-2 workers get such a break because their employer pays so much of the premium---well, look at your premiums the same way and it works out to be the same thing....not to mention all of the other deductions that you get that w-2 employees do NOT get....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2017, 12:51 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,580 posts, read 56,488,147 times
Reputation: 23386
Marginal tax rates (15%/25%) determine tax savings on health insurance premiums for those not covered by their employer. Essentially, a $1,600/mo. premium (my dil's employer cost) can become, adjusting for tax savings, $1,360 or $1,200 - essentially a 15% or 25% reduction. Usually nowhere near an employer subsidy for similar coverage, as evidenced by dil's premium of $500. Her employer is subsidizing 69% - a far cry from a tax savings of 15% or 25%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2017, 01:58 PM
 
3,613 posts, read 4,118,813 times
Reputation: 5008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
Marginal tax rates (15%/25%) determine tax savings on health insurance premiums for those not covered by their employer. Essentially, a $1,600/mo. premium (my dil's employer cost) can become, adjusting for tax savings, $1,360 or $1,200 - essentially a 15% or 25% reduction. Usually nowhere near an employer subsidy for similar coverage, as evidenced by dil's premium of $500. Her employer is subsidizing 69% - a far cry from a tax savings of 15% or 25%.
Not quite...when you are talking business taxes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2017, 02:05 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,750,169 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwerty View Post
Not quite...when you are talking business taxes

She's right when talking about a sole proprietor.
.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2017, 01:21 PM
 
1,285 posts, read 592,198 times
Reputation: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChessieMom View Post
Are you saying that 4.5 months to wait for care is reasonable?
For non-urgent surgery?
Reasonable but less than ideal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2017, 12:17 PM
 
1,285 posts, read 592,198 times
Reputation: 762
By the way, the 4.5 months wait for non-urgent care, is an outlier, not an average figure.
It's the time-limit when fines start kicking in to the providers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Health Insurance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top