Do you have any standards of proof that you employ before passing along stuff like this?
Here is the entire evidenciary support for the claim:
Quote:
The newspaper reported that according to a U.S. government source
|
The source is not identified, no documentation is presented...after a time, do you not ask yourself what is the difference between a completely unverifiable source, and no source at all? Or the difference between someone claiming to have a source and someone simply inventing things out of the atmosphere?
This isn't history, this is SciFi wild speculation.
This is like your Hoover thread....nothing actually here.
Please try and be more discriminating before you post.