Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-27-2018, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,632 posts, read 9,458,962 times
Reputation: 22975

Advertisements

Point #1:
Brazil had millions of more slave than America

Point #2:
Brazil still ended slavery in 1888 without any civil war

Again, to say America would’ve continued slavery to this day, beyond Brazil is hilarious. Slavery was a dying inefficient non-sustainable means of production which explains why the South lost so badly in the Civil War.

Truth is, the folks in the south pretty much died for a system that was dying anyway. This is why many people say the South fought for states rights, not for slavery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-27-2018, 03:19 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
2,089 posts, read 3,907,034 times
Reputation: 2695
The Civil War being about slavery... No women allows her husband or sons to go off to war to free the oppressed. It's all economics at the state level, and it's duty to king (he the subject, eminent domain) or country (he the citizen, as defined by Napoleon).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2018, 08:40 AM
 
652 posts, read 340,593 times
Reputation: 1474
Quote:
Originally Posted by thriftylefty View Post
They got essentially the same deal as before but freedom allowed them to decide who they would be getting the same treatment from. Maya Angelou told the sad tale of how a black man would sit on the porch while his white "boss" had his way with his wife inside his house. This was part of being free ? We're not talking about today we are talking about how much freedom did a black person really have in 1865?
Never happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2018, 09:05 AM
 
28,670 posts, read 18,788,917 times
Reputation: 30974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danbo1957 View Post
The Civil War being about slavery... No women allows her husband or sons to go off to war to free the oppressed. It's all economics at the state level, and it's duty to king (he the subject, eminent domain) or country (he the citizen, as defined by Napoleon).
That's not the topic. Thanks for playing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2018, 09:23 AM
Status: "119 N/A" (set 25 days ago)
 
12,963 posts, read 13,676,205 times
Reputation: 9695
Being free didn't mean the same thing to a black person as it did a white person in 1865. There was still a system in place to usurp black people of rights, status, and anything of value. A good example of this was Blind Tom who died in 1905. He was the highest paid piano player in the 19th century. He nor his mother or siblings ever got a penny of his earnings, estimated at over 2 million a year by today’s standards.

How did this happen? His owner’s family was allowed to continue owning him after slavery was abolished. This was all choreographed through the courts and an arrangement with the freedman’s bureau of all agencies. It would not be wrong to assume that slaves always came in to contact with free blacks from time to time and were able to make comparisons in regard to who was freer.

Last edited by thriftylefty; 12-28-2018 at 10:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2018, 09:28 AM
Status: "119 N/A" (set 25 days ago)
 
12,963 posts, read 13,676,205 times
Reputation: 9695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annino View Post
Never happened.
You can't make terrible things go away by not believing them. There is a term called "the chickens come home to roost." I had a conversation with a white woman old enough to remember being 25 in the depression and she said young white women who had good jobs in offices sometimes had to let their bosses have their way with them and their unemployed husbands knew that was part of the deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2019, 03:07 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,583,593 times
Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motion View Post
Was there anyway that U.S slaves could have freed themselves without a huge violent uprising?

Yes of course , by having the wrath of God fall on the United States of America like it did on the nation of Egypt. God said let my people go!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2019, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
10,930 posts, read 11,725,051 times
Reputation: 13170
During the American revolution many slaves ran away to the British/loyalist side and those that were not killed or captured by the colonists were repatriated by the Crown to England, Canada and other Crown colonies. In the Civil War, it was possible in some circumstances for slaves to escape, join Union Forces and be freed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2019, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
5,725 posts, read 11,716,151 times
Reputation: 9829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frihed89 View Post
During the American revolution many slaves ran away to the British/loyalist side and those that were not killed or captured by the colonists were repatriated by the Crown to England, Canada and other Crown colonies. In the Civil War, it was possible in some circumstances for slaves to escape, join Union Forces and be freed.
Military emancipation, and that's exactly what happened. General David Hunter freed slaves months before the emancipation proclamation was issued, though Lincoln made him rescind the order. Self-emancipated slaves forced the military to act.

General Order No. 11
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2019, 07:22 AM
Status: "119 N/A" (set 25 days ago)
 
12,963 posts, read 13,676,205 times
Reputation: 9695
Some slave owners allowed a slave to purchase himself from them. In Leon Witlack's award winning book, "been in the Storm too long," (1979) there were letters slaves wrote to one another. (yes, many slaves could read and write) Many of the letters began with the sentence, "can you buy me?"
One well known story tells of a slave who purchased himself and subsequently amassed $20,000 to purchase the rest of his family.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top