Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-02-2020, 04:29 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,295,922 times
Reputation: 7284

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
His Vietnam series sucked and one of the reasons is that Burns made mention of returning soldiers being spit on without presenting any visual evidence that it ever happened.
I had a friend who claimed that he was spit on by a girl at the airport when he returned from active duty in uniform. When I was separated from active duty from the USN in February 1973, we were encouraged to wear civilian clothes home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-05-2020, 09:29 AM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,474,011 times
Reputation: 9440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
I had a friend who claimed that he was spit on by a girl at the airport when he returned from active duty in uniform. When I was separated from active duty from the USN in February 1973, we were encouraged to wear civilian clothes home.
With so many people greeting their returning sons, husbands, etc. you would think there would be a picture or news film showing this spitting. A lot of folks, including the soldiers had 8mm cameras back then. To this day no one has been able to offer proof of any spitting. They were ignored when they returned just as the Korean war vets were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2020, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Elysium
12,387 posts, read 8,155,775 times
Reputation: 9199
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
With so many people greeting their returning sons, husbands, etc. you would think there would be a picture or news film showing this spitting. A lot of folks, including the soldiers had 8mm cameras back then. To this day no one has been able to offer proof of any spitting. They were ignored when they returned just as the Korean war vets were.
I was thinking the exact opposite in that camera coverage was no where near what it is today. And for someone to have their instamatic camera just aiming at some random guy in a uniform to catch some other random guy deciding to spit would have been a stroke or Pulitzer Prize winning luk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2020, 08:13 PM
 
7,473 posts, read 4,017,691 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
With so many people greeting their returning sons, husbands, etc. you would think there would be a picture or news film showing this spitting. A lot of folks, including the soldiers had 8mm cameras back then. To this day no one has been able to offer proof of any spitting. They were ignored when they returned just as the Korean war vets were.
like i'm going to film my self going through the Oakland airport with a movie camera just to catch that moment that girl spit on me...........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2020, 08:56 PM
 
Location: Elysium
12,387 posts, read 8,155,775 times
Reputation: 9199
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffdoorgunner View Post
like i'm going to film my self going through the Oakland airport with a movie camera just to catch that moment that girl spit on me...........

More to the point given that back then every frame shot cost you money in film and maybe a flashbulb also people did not take pictures like they do now with battery life and social pressure being the only thing to stop them from recording everything. Nobody was wasting money taking random shots that might catch an incident..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2020, 08:12 AM
 
7,473 posts, read 4,017,691 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post

More to the point given that back then every frame shot cost you money in film and maybe a flashbulb also people did not take pictures like they do now with battery life and social pressure being the only thing to stop them from recording everything. Nobody was wasting money taking random shots that might catch an incident..
another point or two. Having actually been spit on myself........I have talked with many vietnam veterans. Many have raised the points that who was going to delay going home to make a police report or file charges?
One example I take as very honestly related........veterans plane was to leave that night for home.......went to a local pub with couple of guys flying same flight.......after leaving the bar outside a couple of long hairs spit on em and were calling them the proverbial "baby killers" Guys proceded to beat the Crap out of em. Probably a lot of instances like that...........you actually think the police were going to arrest some war veterans being spit on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2020, 11:58 AM
 
Location: The High Desert
16,090 posts, read 10,753,057 times
Reputation: 31499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post
I was thinking the exact opposite in that camera coverage was no where near what it is today. And for someone to have their instamatic camera just aiming at some random guy in a uniform to catch some other random guy deciding to spit would have been a stroke or Pulitzer Prize winning luk.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
With so many people greeting their returning sons, husbands, etc. you would think there would be a picture or news film showing this spitting. A lot of folks, including the soldiers had 8mm cameras back then. To this day no one has been able to offer proof of any spitting. They were ignored when they returned just as the Korean war vets were.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post

More to the point given that back then every frame shot cost you money in film and maybe a flashbulb also people did not take pictures like they do now with battery life and social pressure being the only thing to stop them from recording everything. Nobody was wasting money taking random shots that might catch an incident..
Certainly, passions ran very deep back then and some airports might be different from others.
So the scenario is that some anonymous girl decided to go to the local airport in hopes of meeting a plane for the sole purpose of spitting on returning soldiers and nobody was taking pictures of their son or husband arriving when this took place -- and there was never some accomplice photographing the episode for her scrapbook? I'm not saying that it didn't happen but it seems unlikely that this was nearly as common as people claim.

I do recall returning soldiers being treated poorly by the airlines. Sure, they were flying standby but I saw a couple of occasions of them being unceremoniously removed from planes for some reason after they were seated and buckled in. I know in one case the plane (a Christmas flight) was overloaded (they actually wrote down and tallied everyone's weight) so the soldiers were removed -- probably missed connections and Christmas dinner. I suppose that was just the corporate routine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2020, 01:10 PM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,927,027 times
Reputation: 3461
How did this turn into a 'history of spitting' thread?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2020, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,129,546 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
How did this turn into a 'history of spitting' thread?
It's Burns' next documentary..."The Age of Expectoration", which explores the history of spitting. It's a three parter:
1) Early Wet Discharges
2. The Full Spittle
3. Dribble Days

Narrated by former Olympic champion, Mark Spitz.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top