Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-15-2012, 07:20 PM
 
744 posts, read 1,847,914 times
Reputation: 314

Advertisements

The city has had a population of over 1,000,000 since the 1970 census, but the city just recently got a light rail system, and it has just one line thus far. Look at it's almost equal in size sister to the north Dallas, they have had a massive rail system for a long time now connecting the city to the suburbs. Some of Dallas' system is also in a subway. The much smaller Atlanta area has had a rail/subway system since the early '80s. Pretty much all cities with a population of over 1,000,000 has had rail/subway systems for awhile now. Yet pretty much every Houstonian I have ever talked to has complained about the heavy traffic in the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-15-2012, 07:25 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,959,536 times
Reputation: 7752
politics. Google Tom Delay.

AND FYI Houston had a rail system way before the 80's.

There was extensive rail here in the 1920's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2012, 08:41 PM
 
18,130 posts, read 25,291,852 times
Reputation: 16835
Quote:
Originally Posted by brajohns81 View Post
The city has had a population of over 1,000,000 since the 1970 census, but the city just recently got a light rail system, and it has just one line thus far. Look at it's almost equal in size sister to the north Dallas, they have had a massive rail system for a long time now connecting the city to the suburbs. Some of Dallas' system is also in a subway. The much smaller Atlanta area has had a rail/subway system since the early '80s. Pretty much all cities with a population of over 1,000,000 has had rail/subway systems for awhile now. Yet pretty much every Houstonian I have ever talked to has complained about the heavy traffic in the city.
To put it in few words...
There are politicians that are in favor of investing in building infrastructure for the future
and there are politicians that are against it and want us to wait until we are going insane when we are stuck in traffic.

Too many people here vote for the ones that are against investing in our future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2012, 09:30 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
686 posts, read 1,168,073 times
Reputation: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
To put it in few words...
There are politicians that are in favor of investing in building infrastructure for the future
and there are politicians that are against it and want us to wait until we are going insane when we are stuck in traffic.

Too many people here vote for the ones that are against investing in our future.
+1 to infinity and beyond. It's sad but true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2012, 09:41 PM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,219,693 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by brajohns81 View Post
The city has had a population of over 1,000,000 since the 1970 census, but the city just recently got a light rail system, and it has just one line thus far. Look at it's almost equal in size sister to the north Dallas, they have had a massive rail system for a long time now connecting the city to the suburbs. Some of Dallas' system is also in a subway. The much smaller Atlanta area has had a rail/subway system since the early '80s. Pretty much all cities with a population of over 1,000,000 has had rail/subway systems for awhile now. Yet pretty much every Houstonian I have ever talked to has complained about the heavy traffic in the city.
First, I wouldn't call light rail "rapid transit". Second, Dallas and Atlanta have done no better in dealing with traffic congestion than Houston. Refer to the TTI 2011 Annual Mobility Report, Table 7 - Congestion Trends 1982-2010. This table measures annual wasted hours per commuter. Houston went from 24 hrs to 57 hrs for a negative change of 33 hrs ranking it 10th. Meanwhile Dallas had a negative change of 38 hrs ranking it 6th. The other cities with the most negative change reads like a Who's Who of Cities Who Built Rail.

There may be good reasons to support building rail lines but reducing traffic congestion certainly isn't one of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2012, 02:43 AM
 
385 posts, read 968,049 times
Reputation: 472
Only folks driving to the suburbs sit in traffic. Off the freeways, there isn't that much traffic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2012, 04:27 AM
 
5,976 posts, read 15,273,721 times
Reputation: 6711
Default Black Boxes will change that...

You can rest assured, first the Federal Government is going to mandate "black boxes" for vehicles, this early phase starts next year, and mandatory in 2015 (do a Google search on black boxes for cars). The government said that they would be used for accidents only. I have some swamp land for sale if you buy that. You know darn well they will use it to tax you by the mile, that is their goal. Fuel efficiences (that they mandated BTW), and electric cars are taking a big bite out of the revenue stream to pay for more roads, and maintenance, so they will look to use GPS tracking data to levy a tax on vehicles.

When this happens, people will begin to think twice about commuting, and rail. People who work in the city and live in the suburbs will be the most affected.

I'm looking towards the future... I purchased a second home already inside the loop while the prices are still "attainable".

The residents also look at cost, and I don't get it... if something is expensive now, do you really think it will be less expensive 10, 20 years later? Imagine if Houston built a proper rail system, and kept in place, decades ago? Also, too many people who are not engineers insist that any subway will flood. There is modern technology that mitigates, or eliminates that all together, just see San Francisco, or Amsterdam as examples.

I started a thread about this a long time ago.... http://www.city-data.com/forum/houst...ding-rail.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2012, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Clear Lake, Houston TX
8,376 posts, read 30,705,196 times
Reputation: 4720
Quote:
Originally Posted by tebor79 View Post
Only folks driving to the suburbs sit in traffic. Off the freeways, there isn't that much traffic.
You haven't driven around the city very much, have you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2012, 07:16 AM
 
23,976 posts, read 15,086,618 times
Reputation: 12952
For years Houston had street cars and a great bus system. The help had to be able to get to and from work. Especially with the laws in many areas that the help had to be off the streets by sundown.

Some kind of change happened in the 50's and 60's. Houston powers that be decided everybody had a car and did not need busses. It kinda morphed into why should we tax ourselves so others can have transportation? The unintended consequence was gridlock.

The city planning agency never considered traffic or expansion of any kind when permitting any building.

Somebody even built a short experimental monorail out around So. Main and OST in the mid 50's to encourage the city to think about something other than cars. Didn't work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2012, 07:42 AM
 
833 posts, read 1,886,584 times
Reputation: 845
I think we are also forgetting something special about Houston. It is an oil and gas town and we love our cars. Do you really think mass transit would have worked 10-20 years ago, people would have stayed driving their cars to work from there big SUVs and pickup trucks. It is the Texas way! Why do you think the Katy Freeways is one of the widest highways out there. Transplants do not understand this but yes now we have a gazillion transplants living here and we have grown that much more it is finally time for a rail system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top