Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-08-2015, 07:09 AM
 
1,915 posts, read 3,243,594 times
Reputation: 1589

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantRutgersfan View Post
She also wants daily disclosure of stock buybacks rather then the current quarterly disclosure.

I am not a Hillary cheerleader, but I am impressed with this. Both points seem like very good, practical proposals to me.
That is B.S. She wants to make it so much harder for middle class families aspiring to be upper middle class and working extremely hard to do so - she wants to make it so much harder. That is B.S.!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2015, 07:13 AM
 
1,915 posts, read 3,243,594 times
Reputation: 1589
The other one that really gets to me is I heard she wants to get eliminate back door Roth IRA. I get that she doesn't want people making $1M plus doing so, but $5500/yr is drop in the bucket for a $1M+ income. The people getting screwed the most are families who make just over the direct Roth IRA income limit and worked very hard to get there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2015, 07:17 AM
 
1,915 posts, read 3,243,594 times
Reputation: 1589
Also heard that dems, Hillary very much included, wanted to limit total amount in retirement accounts to something like $3M total. Once reaching that, no more contributions allowed. Again total B.S hurting those working hard and aspiring to be upper middle class who aren't there yet. That is terrible B.S. since many employers offer generous matches. Come on Hillary, stop making it even harder!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2015, 06:03 PM
 
2,806 posts, read 3,180,798 times
Reputation: 2708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Htown2013 View Post
Also heard that dems, Hillary very much included, wanted to limit total amount in retirement accounts to something like $3M total. Once reaching that, no more contributions allowed. Again total B.S hurting those working hard and aspiring to be upper middle class who aren't there yet. That is terrible B.S. since many employers offer generous matches. Come on Hillary, stop making it even harder!!!
Why has upward mobility actually crashed over the last 30 years when the current rules were in place? You make it sound as if they promoted mobility when in fact your financial status depends on that of your parents more than any time since 1980. Why are you so deceptive? What is your agenda? Compare this to upward mobility in the 1950s or 60s which was a lot higher and before any retirement accounts were in place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top