Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
17% is so realistic. This certainly couldn't be a bubble. Not a chance.
The historical market risk premium is the difference between what an investor expects to make as a return on an equity portfolio and the risk-free rate of return. Over the last century, the historical market risk premium has averaged between 3.5% and 5.5%.
Bernie didn't generate any returns so it's kind of odd to bring him up unless sensationalism is just your thing. I'm pretty sure no one here is projected a 17% annual return average
Bernie didn't generate any returns so it's kind of odd to bring him up unless sensationalism is just your thing. I'm pretty sure no one here is projected a 17% annual return average
Shouldn't have been 17% in the first place. No rationality except for the fact that there is a MASSIVE conflict of interest through central bank liquidity injections of $300B per month.
I don't even need sensationalism. That's the truth.
Can anyone say, "It's a set up Jack for $400."
DING DING DING.
And what's your prize? Uh, how about a global financial consolidation since this is the fault of "populism."
Shouldn't have been 17% in the first place. No rationality except for the fact that there is a MASSIVE conflict of interest through central bank liquidity injections of $300B per month.
I don't even need sensationalism. That's the truth.
Can anyone say, "It's a set up Jack for $400."
DING DING DING.
And what's your prize? Uh, how about a global financial consolidation since this is the fault of "populism."
Lol.
Don't believe me, "just watch."
You are voicing your opinion which is fine but you are actively engaging in sensationalism, believe me
17% is so realistic. This certainly couldn't be a bubble. Not a chance.
The historical market risk premium is the difference between what an investor expects to make as a return on an equity portfolio and the risk-free rate of return. Over the last century, the historical market risk premium has averaged between 3.5% and 5.5%.
That's what people who invested with Madoff said too.
Who cares about fundamentals.
Honestly, it's hard to be upset with Madoff because what he said was true. The investors should have known better. It was clearly a scam.
keep on basing your strategy on what happened to madoff clients and keep getting no returns.
the funny thing is that you will end up with much less money and still probably think you are smarter than everyone else.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
