Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I found this great website called Portfolio Visualizer and it really taught me some things about the stock market and investments! I learned that trying all kinds of exotic investments has cost me lots of investment return. I thought I would create a truly diverse set of investments that would be interesting to follow and protect me against a bear market. I should have just gone with VTI (Total Stock Market) and called it a day!
Here were the crazy investments, with the stock symbol in brackets, I have abandoned in recent months:
Hmm. Well you live & you learn. You don't want to diversify into junk, you want to diversify into quality. NLY, ROYL, PSEC is all junk pretty much. PFF isn't bad in my opinion. T is debatable.
Diversifying for a bear market does not man betting only on prosperity and low inflation. What most call diversified is far from it. If on those big rallies in stocks nothing fell modestly you ain’t diversified
Oh well, at least you are admitting your mistakes.
I always get flak from someone about this, but I'd say there's nothing wrong with VTI, but I wouldn't be 100% stocks. Adding a bond fund or a bond ETF into the mix is a good idea, IMO.
Last edited by mysticaltyger; 08-29-2018 at 12:48 PM..
Well, actually the flak comes from owning bonds. Sorry if I didn't clearly express that.
LOL you own bonds? what a looooser.
just kidding. i actually dont hold bonds but i thought that made me more unique than someone who does. i figure if i really wanted to reduce the volatility then probably better to hold more cash than to hold bonds.
Hmm. Well you live & you learn. You don't want to diversify into junk, you want to diversify into quality.
Respectfully, I disagree.
You want to diversify into uncorrelated assets (preferably uncorrelated asset classes). You want one holding that tends to zig when the others zag (although that would be negative correlation rather than non-correlation).
An old professor of mine used to say, "the ideal 2-stock portfolio is to own stock in one company that makes baby diapers and another that makes condoms."
As an aside, the problem that happened in the Great Recession was most all historically uncorrelated asset classes became correlated and went south, so that diversification didn't help.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.