Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Legal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-09-2009, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Out of this world
278 posts, read 1,520,280 times
Reputation: 169

Advertisements

Obama to lift HIV/AIDS travel ban - CNN.com

I'm not sure if this is a Health or Immigration thread. Well here goes.

Anyone aware that the HIV/AIDS travel ban was lifted by Obama? Anyone never knew there was a ban in the first place? Do you feel this is more of an immigration problem?

I'm just curious. Personally, I never knew there was such a ban.

I do feel the United States should not take in sickly people. Partly because of the potential spread of the diseases and partly because we haven't helped our own with this disease. IMO we should take care of home first, then look to help others. It's only an opinion though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-09-2009, 08:18 PM
 
439 posts, read 1,221,915 times
Reputation: 386
I knew there was a ban, because I've worked with HIV populations and seen the stigma they encounter every day. Friends of theirs won't go to the bathroom in the same stall they have, you know, just in case. It's pathetic.

Herpes is communicable and can't be cured, what about that? What about any other number of communicable and incurable diseases?

When people think AIDS/HIV they think of gay people, poor people, or racial minorities, and that's one of the reasons the stigma has continued and the ban hasn't been lifted until now, like the article says. If you have sex with a condom, don't share needles, and don't drink other people's blood, your chance of catching HIV is incredibly small, just like taking care of yourself if you have herpes. Keeping the ban alive stigmatizes people with HIV/AIDS much more than any other group of people who have incurable diseases. People who are your relatives and loved ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2009, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Anchorage, Alaska (most of the time)
1,226 posts, read 3,646,346 times
Reputation: 1934
Oh yes, I knew about it. When travelling to the US, you have to sign a paper, and one of the things that is asked is whether or not you have HIV/AIDS.

I think it's great. Finally! There aren't many countries that have had this travel ban, and eventhough to my knowledge, I don't know anyone afflicted by HIV/AIDS, I can only imagine how it must feel to know that you are not allowed into a country simply because you have a disease.
Seriously, it's isn't hyper contagious - pretty much only through VERY intimate relations with someone affected. And just because you travel someplace doesn't mean that you are about to "hop in bed" with lots of people (or even one).

Again, it was a pathetic ban. The US has so many affected with HIV/AIDS already, that banning people (most of them are poor people living in undeveloped nations - it's not very likely that they are going to pour into the US just because of the lift of the ban) from VISITING won't and hasn't done much difference.

Sweden hasn't had this ban, and yet there has been no mass influx of people with HIV/AIDS that have "spread the disease". (That has been mainly done by immigration, and the US immigration policy regarding the disease has not been changed by this as far as I know)

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Out of this world
278 posts, read 1,520,280 times
Reputation: 169
Your right. I would feel horrible if a place did not accept me because of a disease.

But the United States is known for taking in immigrants. It is known as the land of opportunity. I just think we should take care of home first. How can we take in thousands of sick people when we already have millions sick with the same disease. Where would the immegrants live? Whose going to pay to take care of them?

Don't get me wrong. I do believe we should help, but not when our own are suffering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 02:19 PM
 
Location: St Thomas, US Virgin Islands
24,665 posts, read 69,718,121 times
Reputation: 26727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbatiste View Post
Your right. I would feel horrible if a place did not accept me because of a disease.

But the United States is known for taking in immigrants. It is known as the land of opportunity. I just think we should take care of home first. How can we take in thousands of sick people when we already have millions sick with the same disease. Where would the immegrants live? Whose going to pay to take care of them?

Don't get me wrong. I do believe we should help, but not when our own are suffering.
In my opinion you're being overly dramatic and indulging in some pot-stirring.

Do you really believe there are "thousands" of people with HIV/AIDS anxiously standing at the border waiting for entry as legal immigrants? You posted the link to the article and maybe you should read that article more carefully to understand the reasoning and intent behind the decision to lift the ban.

The article itself states that according to the CDC there are estimated to be 1 million people in the US infected with HIV with one quarter of that number unaware that they have it. So much for your "millions sick with the same disease" comment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 02:30 PM
 
26,585 posts, read 62,061,326 times
Reputation: 13166
While I ahve no problem with people with HIV/AIDS visiting our country, I don't think we should allow them to immigrate permanantly. My concern is for the burden they will place on our already bankrupt healthcare system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 03:43 PM
 
1,638 posts, read 4,550,898 times
Reputation: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by violent cello View Post
I knew there was a ban, because I've worked with HIV populations and seen the stigma they encounter every day. Friends of theirs won't go to the bathroom in the same stall they have, you know, just in case. It's pathetic.

Herpes is communicable and can't be cured, what about that? What about any other number of communicable and incurable diseases?

When people think AIDS/HIV they think of gay people, poor people, or racial minorities, and that's one of the reasons the stigma has continued and the ban hasn't been lifted until now, like the article says. If you have sex with a condom, don't share needles, and don't drink other people's blood, your chance of catching HIV is incredibly small, just like taking care of yourself if you have herpes. Keeping the ban alive stigmatizes people with HIV/AIDS much more than any other group of people who have incurable diseases. People who are your relatives and loved ones.
Yes it is ridiculous. Hepatitis B is far, far more contagious than HIV.
Plus - nowadays HIV is very treatable with antivirals, so fewer people go on to develop AIDS (in Western society)which is classified as a syndrome , or collection of illnesses presenting together.
There is a HUGE difference between being HIV positive and having AIDS.

I know that you have to be tested for HIV when you have a medical for a Green Card but not for work visas.
My husband works in healthcare and as part of his medical screen he was tested for Hepatitis, but not HIV.
Used to be that they asked about your HIV on Mortgage/ Life insurance applications here in the UK ie Have you ever been tested for HIV? Even if you had had a test it caused problems, so people were reluctant to get tested,which is crazy.

Not sure about now though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 04:11 PM
 
1,638 posts, read 4,550,898 times
Reputation: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by annerk View Post
While I ahve no problem with people with HIV/AIDS visiting our country, I don't think we should allow them to immigrate permanantly. My concern is for the burden they will place on our already bankrupt healthcare system.
I think you need to read up on the difference between being HIV positive and having AIDS.
You could just as well say that you shouldn't allow anyone in who smokes, is overweight, has High BP or cholesterol or is diabetic.
These risk factors contribute to heart disease, peripheral vascular disease and stroke by the million, every day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 04:14 PM
 
1,638 posts, read 4,550,898 times
Reputation: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by STT Resident View Post
In my opinion you're being overly dramatic and indulging in some pot-stirring.

Do you really believe there are "thousands" of people with HIV/AIDS anxiously standing at the border waiting for entry as legal immigrants? You posted the link to the article and maybe you should read that article more carefully to understand the reasoning and intent behind the decision to lift the ban.

The article itself states that according to the CDC there are estimated to be 1 million people in the US infected with HIV with one quarter of that number unaware that they have it. So much for your "millions sick with the same disease" comment.
I agree, and I also think it may be the case that people would not choose the USA to emigrate to purely for health reasons. Far more likely to pick a European country that has "free" healthcare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 04:19 PM
 
26,585 posts, read 62,061,326 times
Reputation: 13166
Quote:
Originally Posted by susan42 View Post
I think you need to read up on the difference between being HIV positive and having AIDS.
You could just as well say that you shouldn't allow anyone in who smokes, is overweight, has High BP or cholesterol or is diabetic.
These risk factors contribute to heart disease, peripheral vascular disease and stroke by the million, every day.
I know the difference between HIV and AIDS. HIV is a virus that eventually causes AIDS. AIDS is a terminal illness. And frankly it wouldn't bother me if we exclude all of those above risk factors from permanant immigration either. We can't support the entire world, even though many would like us to.

And if you think for one minute that there isn't "free healthcare" in the US, you obviously don't know the real story. Show up on the doorstep of any hospital with a life threatening illness or injury, and you won't get turned away. In fact you can't get turned away by law from any hospital that gets public funds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Legal Immigration
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top