Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-05-2011, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,013,345 times
Reputation: 6128

Advertisements

RE: 2 AM last call - Yes it is simply a tool for law enforcement to pump more money into municipal and state governments so they can say they balanced budgets without raising taxes - which would be much more visible - and bring negative consequences on the politicians - like being re-elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-05-2011, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,607,009 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
2am last call = lame, lame, lame
Especially because the reason for the 2 AM last call no longer exists.

There's no risk of people being on the street late at night in case Japanese Zeros decide to do to L.A. what they did to Oahu. The risk of aerial bombardment by Japan is no longer extant.

(Actually, we now know that a "West Coast Blitz" would have been impossible due to the limitations on the range of the Zero. But during WW2 that information was not widely known.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2011, 09:12 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh PA
1,125 posts, read 2,349,004 times
Reputation: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles View Post

[/i]
Persons classified as "ugly" may not walk down any street. [i](San Francisco)
(Walnut)
Someone care to let me know if this is a real law or what? How can there be a law against looks which are 100% objective. If this is true, it is something that the Supreme Court and the ACLU should hear about
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2011, 11:52 PM
 
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
9,197 posts, read 16,845,334 times
Reputation: 6373
Quote:
Originally Posted by escilade18 View Post
Someone care to let me know if this is a real law or what? How can there be a law against looks which are 100% objective. If this is true, it is something that the Supreme Court and the ACLU should hear about
Might not be such a bad thing, as long as you're ugly and fast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,013,345 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by escilade18 View Post
Someone care to let me know if this is a real law or what? How can there be a law against looks which are 100% objective. If this is true, it is something that the Supreme Court and the ACLU should hear about
I think you meant to say subjective.

As for how it would be enforced, simple. The city council would create an Ugliness Designation Commitee. This commitee would recieve reports of ugly person from citizens, review the report, determine if someone is too ugly to walk on the street, and then file an injunction against them, with the only exception for them to be allowed on the street being if they are walking to the city limits. This all of course would be worded in legalese with the intent that it be only understandable to lawyers, policy wonks, and readers of Latin. San Francisco would have the most beautiful people walking on it's street - no other major city could compare (except for Walnut, which is not a major city!). Mission accomplished!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 10:57 PM
 
171 posts, read 582,115 times
Reputation: 139
1. Proposition 13
2. Speed limits on rural freeways
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 10:10 AM
 
566 posts, read 1,557,421 times
Reputation: 466
How about cities like Calabasas where smoking is basically banned everywhere in the city and not allowed on sidewalks, vast parks, outdoor patios, or anywhere where there might be a chance of getting even a whiff of smoke. Laws like that make it all the easier for me to enjoy the fumes and carbon monoxide of passing diesel trucks without it being ruined by a person's cigarette smoke. I understand people not wanting to eat a meal next to someone smoking, and that indoor smoke lingers, but all these outdoor smoking bans are pretty silly. And now it looks like the newest crop of laws are banning smoking in condos and apartments, as if the government should have any say in what you do in the privacy of your own home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea.
273 posts, read 655,641 times
Reputation: 215
Is there a law in CA about train wrecks? Because this thread certainly is one on its way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,013,345 times
Reputation: 6128
CAL. PEN. CODE § 219 : California Code - Section 219

This California's law for train wrecks. Causing a train wreck is punishable with life inprisonment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 06:50 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
1,297 posts, read 3,101,083 times
Reputation: 1168
last calls in california at 2am begin so much sooner than other places ive noticed. theyll begin last call at 115 or so and start kickin people out at 130. so silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top