Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-18-2017, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,607,009 times
Reputation: 7477

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuvSouthOC View Post
If so, 10-12 degrees cooler would be nice especially further in.
I'd like to give LA 35 inches of rain a year and clouds 200 days a year.

Last edited by majoun; 12-18-2017 at 07:45 PM..

 
Old 12-18-2017, 07:34 PM
 
1,069 posts, read 1,261,800 times
Reputation: 1521
Push the Santa Monica Mts. 5-8 miles north so you can have large-scale, ocean-cooled development along the south-facing coast.
 
Old 12-18-2017, 07:40 PM
 
Location: Venice
89 posts, read 68,487 times
Reputation: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicano3000X View Post
That will lead back to all the traffic issues we already have.

Your complaining about leapords eating your face so your solution is to slap another steak on your face.
Negative.

There would be less people therefore traffic would improve.
 
Old 12-18-2017, 07:43 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,607,009 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicano3000X View Post
That will lead back to all the traffic issues we already have.

Your complaining about leapords eating your face so your solution is to slap another steak on your face.
Kind of funny that poster elsewhere posted that they prefer Venice to the Valley

If they prefer single family homes they should prefer Glendale to Venice. For that matter they should prefer Woodland Hills and West Hills to Venice, They should even prefer Arleta and Mission Hills to Venice by those standards
 
Old 12-18-2017, 07:43 PM
 
7 posts, read 8,298 times
Reputation: 17
I’d make LA annex all of OC, IE, and Ventura to turn them into 5 boroughs like New York.
 
Old 12-18-2017, 07:44 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,607,009 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Trigo View Post
I’d make LA annex all of OC, IE, and Ventura to turn them into 5 boroughs like New York.
LA is too big already.
 
Old 12-18-2017, 07:53 PM
 
10,681 posts, read 6,115,507 times
Reputation: 5667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rlnoir2 View Post
Negative.

There would be less people therefore traffic would improve.
LA started out exactly what you described. A suburban dream
 
Old 12-18-2017, 08:31 PM
 
Location: Venice
89 posts, read 68,487 times
Reputation: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
Kind of funny that poster elsewhere posted that they prefer Venice to the Valley

If they prefer single family homes they should prefer Glendale to Venice. For that matter they should prefer Woodland Hills and West Hills to Venice, They should even prefer Arleta and Mission Hills to Venice by those standards
Aww youre still thinking about me. Thats cute

That burn from the other thread must still sting
 
Old 12-18-2017, 08:46 PM
 
10,681 posts, read 6,115,507 times
Reputation: 5667
Quote:
Originally Posted by My commute is 2 miles View Post
I’d make the entire Southern California coastline 100 undeveloped and make everyone live at minumum 30 miles Inland. I feel like if humans didn’t touch our coast, it’d be more stunningly beautiful. Imagine a Laguna Beach or Malibu with no house or street insight.

There’s so much land in the Valley that LA could sprawl forever if it wanted to. Everyone can have a piece of the pie and aquire affordable land with big acre lots like i do right now.
That sprawl equates to higher traffic. Essentially the same L.A. as now, but less desirable since it is further from the beach. Which might help with the population and curve some traffic.
 
Old 12-18-2017, 08:47 PM
 
10,681 posts, read 6,115,507 times
Reputation: 5667
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
LA is too big already.
True, I'd either add more mountains or more bodies of water to divide up L.A. and make it so sprawl isn't possible. But the valley can still exist as a suburb.

Push L.A.'s birth further back so it develops without the car in mind.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top