Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-24-2008, 03:23 PM
 
355 posts, read 1,480,162 times
Reputation: 355

Advertisements

US home prices at 2004 levels, sales off 3.1 pct: Financial News - Yahoo! Finance (http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081124/economy.html - broken link)

"Compared with last month, sales were down in much of the country. But in the West sales were up 40.5 percent compared with October last year, without adjusting for seasonal factors. Buyers in places like Las Vegas and Orange County, Calif., snapped up distressed properties at bargain prices."

I don't know what they're talking about in terms of Orange County. Maybe in the lousy areas and overbuilt new developments, but in the desirable areas, are properties moving? I'd think sellers would still be overpricing and unrealistic, the way it is in Los Angeles.

Did anyone take a look at the listings in the Real Estate (westside version) section of the LA Times this past weekend? Everything is still ridiculously overpriced, and the only homes listed at remotely reasonable prices, were for awful, tiny shoeboxes - often needing a lot of updating at the very least, tiny lots, tiny post WW2 cookie cutter shoeboxes.

These realtors/agents in the article begging for a handout and complaining about slow business sure have some nerve - they didn't seem to mind when they were making 5 figure commissions without actually earning it. They should be complaining to the delusional sellers they represent, who continue to ask unrealistic prices for their properties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-24-2008, 04:20 PM
 
1,319 posts, read 4,245,559 times
Reputation: 1152
Prices in the desirable parts of LA have not dropped much. There's a reason that they're desirable. Dont expect bargains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2008, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
419 posts, read 1,450,767 times
Reputation: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by BennyPhoenix View Post
Prices in the desirable parts of LA have not dropped much. There's a reason that they're desirable. Dont expect bargains.

Expect them to drop as time marches on. There is nothing, I mean nothing, that will keep pricing out of whack with the incomes of a respective area.

This isn't sacred ground.

Prices always fall to a historical mean - this isn't a "new paradigm." Count on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2008, 07:18 PM
 
1,319 posts, read 4,245,559 times
Reputation: 1152
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConsideringLA View Post
Expect them to drop as time marches on. There is nothing, I mean nothing, that will keep pricing out of whack with the incomes of a respective area.

This isn't sacred ground.

Prices always fall to a historical mean - this isn't a "new paradigm." Count on it.
Dont expect homes in desirable areas to drop more than 50% off the high, if that much.
Less desirable areas have already dropped 50% and more. Supply and demand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2008, 11:16 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
419 posts, read 1,450,767 times
Reputation: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by BennyPhoenix View Post
Dont expect homes in desirable areas to drop more than 50% off the high, if that much.
Less desirable areas have already dropped 50% and more. Supply and demand.
You're pulling numbers out of your backside. I expect prices to drop to the point of affordability for people that live (or have the means to live) in a given area. That's the demand side of your logic.

ps Don't mistake desire for demand. Not unless it brings a down payment and financing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2008, 06:38 AM
 
1,319 posts, read 4,245,559 times
Reputation: 1152
Let's talk 2 years from now and see who is right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2008, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
419 posts, read 1,450,767 times
Reputation: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by BennyPhoenix View Post
Let's talk 2 years from now and see who is right.
OK. Let's make it 2.5. With all due respect, I give a li'l more weight to a Yale economist and the banks who facilitate the purchase of said assets than a local Real-estate "professional."

http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/projections-using-case-shiller-index-los-angeles1987-2012.jpg (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2008, 08:09 AM
 
1,319 posts, read 4,245,559 times
Reputation: 1152
That analysis is for the LA market as a whole.
I'm talking desirable areas only, not the whole of LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2008, 08:39 AM
hsw
 
2,144 posts, read 7,166,621 times
Reputation: 1540
IIRC, prices in desirable parts of Westside (BH, BelAir, Brentwood) fell some 40% from '89 peak in early '90s recession

Today's credit crisis is far more severe than easy stuff of early '90s; many wealthy are facing margin calls, as their holdings of stock plummet in value; many houses on Westside are wkend houses of wealthy people from SiliconValley, Chicago, etc, so are rather discretionary houses that can be quietly put on mkt if owners need to raise cash

House prices in super-affluent areas take longer to begin to fall (but market forces ultimately prevail at every socio-economic level) as many wealthy have more lawyers to delay forced sales at low prices....but new, spec houses in Greenwich, CT (a fairly wealthy, allegedly old-money place) are already selling for some 50% of '06 prices....and the layoffs in NYC's high-income investment banking industry are just beginning
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2008, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
419 posts, read 1,450,767 times
Reputation: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by BennyPhoenix View Post
That analysis is for the LA market as a whole.
I'm talking desirable areas only, not the whole of LA.

Alright "BennyPhoenix" - lay it out - Brentwood? Palisades? Santa Monica?


Extra credit if you can name one area that has ever survived a real estate bubble.

ps all boats rise and fall together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top