Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-27-2008, 09:36 PM
 
636 posts, read 2,646,059 times
Reputation: 256

Advertisements

Townhouses at Hoyt and Van Nuys Boulevard, Pacoima.

I would drive past this townhome complex while it was being built, wondering what its fate would be. Shortly after completion there was a large sign advertising the condos for $370K, 0 down. The market had already started to tank. Original prices were about $435K (probably even more for this 4 + 4). Now there is one listed as a short sale for 269K. I'd be royally p*ssed if I'd paid 435K in 2007 and saw my neighbor drop to 269K (and still not sell). No wonder so many people are turning in the keys.

What would the price have to drop to for you to buy in this area?

Last edited by Green Irish Eyes; 12-27-2008 at 09:48 PM.. Reason: No real estate links, please
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-27-2008, 09:59 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,472,244 times
Reputation: 7586
They'd need to drop another $166k.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2008, 10:38 PM
 
636 posts, read 2,646,059 times
Reputation: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
They'd need to drop another $166k.
so you'd buy at 103K? OUCH.

by the way, the moderators removed my link because it was a real estate link but if you live in SFV you know where they are located.

I was watching one of those house flipper reality shows today. A young woman fixed up a long beach condo and sold it for asking (339K). That episode must have filmed last year... I'd bid 200K for the condo shown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2008, 10:45 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,472,244 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by LALady View Post
so you'd buy at 103K? OUCH.
Well, you'd have to pay me to live there but a condo in Pacoima should be lucky to get into the triple digits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2008, 10:52 PM
 
636 posts, read 2,646,059 times
Reputation: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
Well, you'd have to pay me to live there but a condo in Pacoima should be lucky to get into the triple digits.
A lot of them are bumping around 100K now, simply unheard of 2 years ago. 100K! That's a $500 mortgage payment! Less than rent!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2008, 11:20 PM
 
938 posts, read 4,096,357 times
Reputation: 783
You couldn't event pay me to live there...

Paicoma is seriously one of the least interesting engaging, least architecturally or culturally relevant, socially, etc significant places in the city.

In short: it's an armpit!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2008, 12:32 AM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,369,869 times
Reputation: 21892
Price reductions like these are happening everywhere. For me that is a good thing. It is funny that a few years ago people would buy anything at anyprice and the banks allowed them to do it. Now prices have declined in some areas drastically and the banks have stopped giving out loans to anyone with a pulse. My thoughts are that when the monthly payments are less than rent and the prices are 40 and 50% less than they were a couple years ago the banks would be willing to loan to more people. You would think that the banks would have looked long and hard at offering to fund a loan on a high priced home to anyone willing to sign on the dotted line. For me that isn't an issue as we have been prepairing for this time in history when prices would go back to what the average middle income worker earns. I bet that more people could afford to buy homes now than in the past few years. Many of those that did buy during the past five year period could not honestly afford what they had purchased. You can tell that is the case with all the short sales and forclosures out there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2008, 01:07 AM
 
636 posts, read 2,646,059 times
Reputation: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by King0fthehill View Post
You couldn't event pay me to live there...

Paicoma is seriously one of the least interesting engaging, least architecturally or culturally relevant, socially, etc significant places in the city.

In short: it's an armpit!
Wikipedia has an entry for Pacoima. Interesting fact: Leonardo Dicaprio and Cheech Marin are from Pacoima. The 'projects' also has an interesting history. I wasn't aware that they were built to house Lockheed employees during WWII.

Pacoima, Los Angeles, California - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2008, 01:13 AM
 
636 posts, read 2,646,059 times
Reputation: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
Many of those that did buy during the past five year period could not honestly afford what they had purchased. You can tell that is the case with all the short sales and forclosures out there.
They couldn't afford it but were betting on a quick flip or the ability to refinance or something magical happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2008, 01:33 PM
 
1,319 posts, read 4,246,153 times
Reputation: 1152
At the low $100,000's it's not bad. Mortgage, taxes, insurance, and fees would be cheaper than rent and you'd actually own something. If you dont mind living in pacoima.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top