Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-04-2010, 09:49 PM
 
57 posts, read 147,068 times
Reputation: 26

Advertisements

I am a Massachusetts native (from the South Shore), but I don't know a lot about housing here except that it's expensive. Are there any areas, preferably south/southeast of Boston that you could get a decent house with at least three bedrooms for $250,000 or less? We both work in Boston, so anyplace we end up would have to be within commuting distance of there. And are in a decent location? We'd much prefer to buy a house than a condo right now.

We are saving for a down payment now and want to put a 10% down payment down. We previously wanted a 20% one but if we stay in Massachusetts, on our salaries, and with my student loans, and rent, it would probably take five years or so to save that much with prices what they are around here. So I'd rather put down 10% in the near future rather than waiting and then house prices become not so affordable again and make up some of what we didn't pay for the down payment early on. Even if we could pay more than 10% we would never be able to afford any more than $250,000 on what we make now.

I've been looking at some of the online listings but it's been pretty discouraging. Most towns seem to have maybe a dozen listings in our price range, if we're lucky. Ideally I'd like to live in an area like Kingston or one of the other towns in the area that bridges the Cape and the South Shore but a lot of them are pretty expensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2010, 10:28 AM
 
40 posts, read 106,415 times
Reputation: 37
If you both work in Boston, save your money and get a nice two bedroom apartment. A house is not a good investment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2010, 05:21 PM
 
Location: EPWV
19,616 posts, read 9,601,597 times
Reputation: 21350
Anyone buy a house recently in MA? Is it true that the IRS has become involved in the paperwork now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2010, 08:07 PM
 
278 posts, read 704,459 times
Reputation: 270
Why would the IRS be involved in the paperwork?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2010, 08:46 PM
 
Location: Norman, OK
3,478 posts, read 7,268,893 times
Reputation: 1201
Quote:
Originally Posted by reaching4stars View Post
If you both work in Boston, save your money and get a nice two bedroom apartment. A house is not a good investment.
Single family homes were and always will be great investments. Sure, the market is sluggish right now, but especially in the Boston area, the inflated prices and "housing bubble burst" never really happened. That said, prices are somewhat lower now, which makes it more affordable for people to jump into the market.

As long as you don't go in over your head and get something you can afford in a good area that you plan on staying in for few to many years, buying is a smart thing to do. Smarter than rent each month (and likely cheaper, depending on the place and location).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2010, 11:26 PM
 
Location: Southern New Hampshire
4,643 posts, read 13,972,826 times
Reputation: 4626
In just about any market, a single family home is a better investment than a condo, unless you are planning to live there a certain number of years then flip it into income-producing property. Which is possible at this time, rates and prices being what they are.


In response to the 2 questions below, the IRS was involved in the paperwork when the '1st time buyer' tax credit was active. Since people were claiming an 8K credit on federal taxes, there was certain paperwork to be filled out in addition to standard forms. Also, if people purchase homes using various programs, there may or may not be IRS involvement. However, I do not believe that homes purchased with a standard (conventional) loan are not subject to IRS involvement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cat1116 View Post
Anyone buy a house recently in MA? Is it true that the IRS has become involved in the paperwork now?
Quote:
Originally Posted by brent s View Post
Why would the IRS be involved in the paperwork?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2010, 08:37 PM
 
278 posts, read 704,459 times
Reputation: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valerie C View Post
In just about any market, a single family home is a better investment than a condo, unless you are planning to live there a certain number of years then flip it into income-producing property. Which is possible at this time, rates and prices being what they are.


In response to the 2 questions below, the IRS was involved in the paperwork when the '1st time buyer' tax credit was active. Since people were claiming an 8K credit on federal taxes, there was certain paperwork to be filled out in addition to standard forms. Also, if people purchase homes using various programs, there may or may not be IRS involvement. However, I do not believe that homes purchased with a standard (conventional) loan are not subject to IRS involvement.
Perhaps for some type of special program the IRS may be involved, but even that I doubt as most programs like that are on the state/local level.


The IRS had no involvement in the first time homebuyer credit (with regards to closing/paperwork) other than processing your application for the credit on your taxes. The only paperwork filed with the IRS to apply for that is the HUD-1, which isn't an IRS form/publication nor is it specific to transactions in which a buyer would be claiming the credit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2010, 08:36 AM
 
Location: North of Boston
3,693 posts, read 7,456,827 times
Reputation: 3673
I don't think you will find much under $300K in Kingston, MA. You might try Bellingham, I have seen new construction advertised there for $275K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top