Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Mazda
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-07-2010, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
14,100 posts, read 28,517,925 times
Reputation: 8075

Advertisements

Forgot to mention that my wife's Protege' had 172,000 miles on it when it was T-boned by the Jeep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-07-2010, 06:04 PM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,464,896 times
Reputation: 12187
According to the following link Mazda ranks 12th best out of 34 auto makes. The most reliable makes are Scion, Acura, Toyota, & Honda; Mazda got similar marks to Kia and Lincoln.

Asian brands dominate car quality rankings; Scion most reliable - USATODAY.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2010, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Deerwood
725 posts, read 2,570,478 times
Reputation: 327
I owned the Mazda 626 years ago and it never gave me any trouble. Traded it in for a van. We have a Mazdaspeed3, no problems. I'd still have my Mazda MPV van (115,000 miles on it) if my son hadn't wrecked it. I'd say they are very reliable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2010, 07:50 PM
 
Location: The High Seas
7,372 posts, read 16,009,038 times
Reputation: 11867
I've had 3 Mazdas- a GLC and two 626's (one manual transmission and one automatic transmission). The automatic version of the 626 was a piece of crapola. The Ford transmission that came with the car was so prone to breakdown that it was the worst car I ever owned. The manual transmission version was a fine car. You have to go by the model and year to know the answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2010, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Deerwood
725 posts, read 2,570,478 times
Reputation: 327
Yeah, every year must be different because my old automatic 626 was a cream puff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2010, 08:28 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,146,737 times
Reputation: 29983
Yeah... my grandma had a '99 (I think?) 626 with an automatic that never gave her any problems. Then again, she did drive it like, well, a grandma. The only issue she had with it was a sucky paint job, which I think was a common issue many Mazdas back then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2010, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Purgatory (A.K.A. Dallas, Texas)
5,007 posts, read 15,418,009 times
Reputation: 2463
Mazda makes a great car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2013, 10:29 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,146,737 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
If all goes according to the current plan, our next car will be another Mazda.
Since someone repped me for the above post, I'll go ahead and note that the next two cars we bought were Mazdas, a Speed6 and a regular 6. The Speed6 has since been reluctantly sold, but we still have the regular 6, a 2004 with a rare V6/manual powertrain combo. It now has 75K miles on it with no non-scheduled maintenance except to replace a leaky gasket exhaust pipe gasket. Runs like brand-new. My wife loves that car and will almost certainly run it into the ground before letting me replace it. At this rate that won't happen for another 10 years unless it succumbs to typical Snow Belt rust before then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2013, 08:42 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,948 posts, read 75,153,734 times
Reputation: 66884
And since you've reopened this thread, I'll throw in that my 2006 Mazda3 still looks brand new, and runs almost like brand new at 95,000 miles.

No doubt I'll hate myself for typing that sentence. *looking for some wood to knock on*

The only thing I dislike about the car is the tires. Those low-profile tires with their skinny little sidewalls last about 20 minutes before the sidewall splits or cracks. Harumph. Apparently the wear on the rear tires especially is from the way the car is designed to give it sportier handling. Makes you wonder what Mazda is thinking -- it's OK if your tires blow out every 25,000 miles as long as you feel like you're driving a sports car?

Last edited by Ohiogirl81; 08-31-2013 at 08:53 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Mazda
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top