Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Military Life and Issues
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-04-2015, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,569,981 times
Reputation: 53073

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TamaraSavannah View Post
When did the QM's become supply clerks?
Hah, they didn't.

Apparently, in Army terminology, quartermasters are more akin to the Navy's LS (Logistics Specialist) rate, which is what the old SK rate became redesignated as a few years ago. (crossed key rating badge - not called storekeeper anymore - one of many ratings that's merged and changed in the past decade). QMs in the Navy have always been involved in navigation and continue to be. They aren't involved in supply logistics.

I'm not sure why a poster would toss around "You were obviously never a sailor" crap, and then list a bunch of factually incorrect misinformation with outdated and plain wrong terminology for young would-be recruits to chance swallowing wholesale. But, then, this is the same poster who has been telling young women seeking information about the Navy that "WAVES" go to a separate boot camp that was shut down years ago, when women were granted permanent service status in 1948 and the Women's Reserve was discontinued as a program, with women being free to join the "regular" Navy. Some people persisted in using "WAVES" colloquially as interchangeable for females as "recently" as 40-ish years ago, but head on up to RTC and TSC at Great Lakes today, call females WAVES and see what kind of reaction that gets.

I bit my tongue on previous threads rather than choose to address the referring to contemporary female sailors as WAVES, and implying (incorrectly) that women get their own special basic training (they don't), but now that somebody else (an actual female veteran) has brought it up, um, yeah. Not correct, or appropriate.

Last edited by TabulaRasa; 09-04-2015 at 09:59 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-04-2015, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,569,981 times
Reputation: 53073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quiettimect View Post
I hate to be a stickler but "RATE" refers to one's pay grade, E-5 for example.


"RATING" refers to one's job, QM (quartermaster) for example. So one would be exploring Navy ratings.


You would think even a NAVET off of that non-subsafe pigboat 633 would know that.

Sorry couldn't resist this fine morning.
You are correct!

The difference between rating/rate was really confusing to me as a civilian on a base when I was new to things and trying to get up to speed on the vocabulary, abbreviations, and acronyms, because SO MANY people use the two interchangeably to refer to occupational specialty.

I'm not sure how that even started, since rate and rating, despite sounding similar, are two totally different things in the Navy, but I wonder if the cute little "choose your rate/choose your fate" rhyme (which gets touted when cautioning recruits to think through what occupational area they end up in) started or added to the confusing usage. But, of course, you don't "choose" your actual rate (i.e. your pay grade), you earn/get promoted to it. That little saying is clearly talking about rating, not rate, but, yeah, doesn't rhyme or flow as nicely unless you shorten it.

But, yeah, many in the Navy definitely do colloquially use "rate" when they are referring to "rating," for whatever reason, even though rate really does mean what "rank" means in other branches. And, no, nobody wants to be corrected on it, even though it's not technically correct terminology.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,569,981 times
Reputation: 53073
Shopkeeper rating no longer exists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Hard aground in the Sonoran Desert
4,866 posts, read 11,222,821 times
Reputation: 7128
Quote:
Originally Posted by TabulaRasa View Post
Shopkeeper rating no longer exists.
They are now LS or Logistics Specialists. SK and PC merged to create LS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 09:52 PM
 
Location: Middle America
37,409 posts, read 53,569,981 times
Reputation: 53073
Yep, mentioned that upthread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2015, 10:14 AM
 
361 posts, read 385,750 times
Reputation: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by TabulaRasa View Post
You are correct!

The difference between rating/rate was really confusing to me as a civilian on a base when I was new to things and trying to get up to speed on the vocabulary, abbreviations, and acronyms, because SO MANY people use the two interchangeably to refer to occupational specialty.

I'm not sure how that even started, since rate and rating, despite sounding similar, are two totally different things in the Navy, but I wonder if the cute little "choose your rate/choose your fate" rhyme (which gets touted when cautioning recruits to think through what occupational area they end up in) started or added to the confusing usage. But, of course, you don't "choose" your actual rate (i.e. your pay grade), you earn/get promoted to it. That little saying is clearly talking about rating, not rate, but, yeah, doesn't rhyme or flow as nicely unless you shorten it.

But, yeah, many in the Navy definitely do colloquially use "rate" when they are referring to "rating," for whatever reason, even though rate really does mean what "rank" means in other branches. And, no, nobody wants to be corrected on it, even though it's not technically correct terminology.
Hi,

I agree that the terms were used interchangeably even when I was in almost 30 years ago. I just posted that to make Submariner chuckle as he served on a boat I also served on.

Hope all is well with you and your family.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2015, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Centro Tejas
543 posts, read 999,692 times
Reputation: 367
To be an LN, one has to be E-5 or above. You can't join the navy as an LN.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2016, 06:46 PM
 
1 posts, read 1,814 times
Reputation: 10
Default Quiettemect

Let me clear a few things up. Mr Quiet is wrong. Rank is Pay grade. Rate is your job. About Adminstration Maintence Adminstrationman, If it's not offered at Meps and u scored high enough on your asvab then go undesignated airman and strike when u get to the fleet.
Retired PSC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2016, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Hard aground in the Sonoran Desert
4,866 posts, read 11,222,821 times
Reputation: 7128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phinfanforever View Post
Let me clear a few things up. Mr Quiet is wrong. Rank is Pay grade. Rate is your job. About Adminstration Maintence Adminstrationman, If it's not offered at Meps and u scored high enough on your asvab then go undesignated airman and strike when u get to the fleet.
Retired PSC
Sorry, your correction isn't correct. Navy enlisted Sailors do not have "rank", they have rates. Naval Officers have ranks. Rate is the pay grade and rating is the job.

Good try though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2016, 08:15 PM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,884 posts, read 10,974,080 times
Reputation: 14180
" About Adminstration Maintence Adminstrationman..."

Sorry, that rating does not exist.

CM1, USN (RET)
Formerly ADR3
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Military Life and Issues

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top