Quote:
Originally Posted by deuterdu
They have made more than they will lose. This is part of the illusion and the media got suckered into reporting it that way. Take all of their earnings since 9-11-2001 subtract their losses at the end of this subprime "meltdown" and they have still made nice average annual returns and they knew it going into it. They consider this years in advance just likje the insurance companies. Just like the neg am loans. They show the full payment on their books as profit to boost their share prices even though it is negatively amortizing. Brilliant!
|
Link? I'm open to learning something new.
Also, why should the starting point be 9-11-2001?
Why not a 1, 3, 5 or 10 year horizon.
(Not that there is "a" right answer but I'd like to hear your rationalization)