Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-03-2008, 08:50 PM
 
60 posts, read 387,171 times
Reputation: 21

Advertisements

I just assigned a purchase agreement on a house less than 250K. How much downpayment I should put, 20% or 35%, if I have the cash? I need 20% to avoid PMI. But will we be better off if we put more down? In this case, we won't really live on a very tight budget since both my wife and I are full-time professionals.



On one hand, if putting more downpayment, we can pay less interest. We will probably move in 3-5 years and putting more down may be helpful to reduce our debut by the time we move in 3-5 years down the road. On the other hand, I heard putting too much cash down will miss other investment opportunities (actually I don't know what to invest given the current economy).. Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-03-2008, 10:04 PM
 
4,285 posts, read 10,763,461 times
Reputation: 3810
yea put more $ down.

But why buy a house if you plan to move in 3 years? Might as well rent if its a foregone conclusion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2008, 10:20 PM
 
60 posts, read 387,171 times
Reputation: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantRutgersfan View Post
yea put more $ down.

But why buy a house if you plan to move in 3 years? Might as well rent if its a foregone conclusion
According to online buy vs rent calculators (yahoo or bankrate etc), it will be better for me to buy. Maybe that is because the house I plan to buy is not very expensive and with a large down payment, I won't pay a lot of interest.

I hear people saying cash is king. But in the current economy I simply don't know where to put the cash other than using it for the down payment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2008, 10:39 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
5,137 posts, read 16,585,075 times
Reputation: 1009
Depending on the area you're in...you maybe able to put 5% and get Lender Paid PMI. I know with 10% you can do that in most areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2008, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Southeast
625 posts, read 4,570,244 times
Reputation: 369
I would not buy a house if you think you might move within the next five years-not the most prudent thing to do at this time...unless the market you're in is severely underpriced and you are getting a great deal and are guaranteed to make money in the next three years...the last thing you want to have to deal with when wanting to move is getting rid of a house. And there are MANY more expenses to tag on with a house vs. renting...I know people say renting is throwing money away, but with the current environment it is possible to be better off renting. keep in mind transaction costs to get in and out of a house too...and your local rental market. I bought my house with the intention of being here for a very long time, otherwise I would have continued renting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2008, 03:07 PM
 
613 posts, read 1,016,835 times
Reputation: 1471
No. Can you buy down the interest rate with more than 20% down? I don't think so, and if not, remember the house is yours regardless of how much of it you buy. Use your money on additional investing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2008, 10:48 AM
 
1,227 posts, read 2,063,732 times
Reputation: 1023
The more money you put down, the better as you will have a good amount of equity should something happen and you have to sell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2008, 07:02 AM
 
28,455 posts, read 85,339,930 times
Reputation: 18728
Exclamation Counter argument -- less to loose...

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYSinger View Post
The more money you put down, the better as you will have a good amount of equity should something happen and you have to sell.

Not that I believe the situation is a dead-nuts probability, they way many do, but if real estate prices in general decline and the property you buy fails to appreciate at all, then I really don't see how buying beats renting. If the property must be sold and the price fails to meet what you have into it, through either a downpayment or the pay down of the mortgage principle then it really does not matter as your capital is still lost...

Personally I do endorse the practice of going into a mortgage with the INTENT of selling the property very early, as that has only worked well for a few years in the recent past. Beyond the problem of potential decline, even when prices are generally rising it can be rough to have a sale cover all the costs that 'homeowners' typically incur. Too many people assign too little weight to the various costs of selling a house, the various expenses that tend to be higher for home owners than renters, and even the fact with a home ownership there is mindset that all the 'stuff' I am buying is like money in the bank -- simply not true. Often the "improvement" that cost the most have the least impact on resale revalue. I have seen LOTS of people loss their shirt over improving houses in even HOT real estate markets. Some times it happens when they put deluxe "infra structure" type upgrades that most buyers will not adequately price in an offer (windows are in this category). Other times there are forces that 'suck up the buyers' -- from a new development selling for LESS than existing homes to changes in near by land use that have a negative impact on nearby homes to increases in crime.

You'd be surprised how many "rules of thumb" end up costing a couple of digits!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2008, 11:13 AM
 
1,227 posts, read 2,063,732 times
Reputation: 1023
A house is intended to be a home, not an investment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2008, 10:59 PM
 
60 posts, read 387,171 times
Reputation: 21
Thanks much for the replies from all of you. Yes, even after putting 25% or 30% down, we will still be abel to max out our retirement accounts. Now it seems to me it would be better to put down as much as possible to save mortgage interest. The only situation I can image to have a good deal by having low downpayment is to get a foreclosure in the future, which I don't expect at all. Other than that, it requires a very good investment to beat the interest.

What do you think to pay off the loan as early as possible, say, in 3 or 4 years instead of 15 or 30 years? Is it financially wise to do so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top