Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-20-2023, 08:17 PM
 
Location: West Midlands, England
676 posts, read 407,837 times
Reputation: 553

Advertisements

Far From Home (1989).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2023, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Coastal Georgia
50,335 posts, read 63,906,560 times
Reputation: 93261
TED. Watching it right now, and despite the good cast, I wish I could block it out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2023, 08:02 PM
 
942 posts, read 562,765 times
Reputation: 1753
Quote:
Originally Posted by james112 View Post
Maybe not the worst but Pearl Harbor is pretty bad.
The war scenes were good. I could have done without that ridiculous first hour with the campy love story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2023, 08:48 PM
 
4,196 posts, read 4,449,313 times
Reputation: 10151
The worse are movies that were meant to be serious and were terrible.



Genghis Khan, starring John Wayne. Putting makeup and clothing of the time period on him and him still act woodenly as "The Duke" is ridiculous. Interestingly, Genghis Khan was a doomed movie because it also was filmed on location in New Mexico downwind of the nuclear testing range and many of the cast members died from variations of cancer likely incurred from their exposure while filming.


Campy movies on the other hand can be often become unintentional cult classics. Supposedly comedic intentions that fall flat or are one joke sketches drawn out occur all to often. The question on these is what preview audience thought they were funny? Or what producer thought to throw that much money at such weak material.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2023, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Wonderland
67,650 posts, read 60,853,687 times
Reputation: 101073
You know what movie I HATED? Valkyrie with Tom Cruise. Cruise was not at ALL believable as Claus von Stauffenberg.

I also didn't care for Fury with Brad Pitt. He was also not believable to me - he looked way too old to be a staff sgt., whose average age in WW2 was 27. I think Brad Pitt was around 50 at the time he was in that role.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2713180/trivia/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2023, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Juneau, AK + Puna, HI
10,545 posts, read 7,735,179 times
Reputation: 16038
"Claws" 1977

A locally made movie, it's very bad. Thankfully most Americans haven't been exposed to it.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075857/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2023, 08:42 AM
 
7,378 posts, read 12,659,218 times
Reputation: 9994
You guys don't know what a really bad theatrical movie is until you've watched "The Meanest Men in the West"! I didn't know what I was in for, and I love Westerns, so I PAID to see it, back in the 1980s. Lee Marvin and Chuck Bronson--except they never meet on the screen, because the movie is stitched together from two unrelated Virginian TV series episodes! With a phony introduction that supposedly creates a narrative connection. It is so bad that your brain will want to escape from your head. Not only does it not make a lick of sense, scenes are repeated and flipped to extend the footage. The credits say directed by Sam Fuller, which is true for both episodes and should be a quality marker, but not with the theatrical release butchering. Worth watching and getting a good laugh just because it is the Worst Movie Ever.

I actually watch a similar "movie" on TV not too long ago, from two other Virginian episodes. I can't remember the title, but it was the same kind of fiasco. So in all fairness they are not conceived as "movies" from the start, but they were indeed theatrical releases. Good grief.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2023, 08:51 AM
 
7,378 posts, read 12,659,218 times
Reputation: 9994
Here's an ordinary, bad movie: Cutthroat Island!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2023, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Maine
22,913 posts, read 28,249,166 times
Reputation: 31219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Fork Fantast View Post
Here's an ordinary, bad movie: Cutthroat Island!
Yeah, I remember that stinker. One of the few movies where my date and I actually walked out of the theater. It wasn't just bad. It was painfully bad. It actually hurt to watch it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2023, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
4,490 posts, read 3,925,838 times
Reputation: 14538
For me it was Dunkirk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top