Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hmm... Seems like you're trying to say my dad is better than your dad
The Beatles- Great band, but if you're into bands spend most of the time in the studio
The Rolling Stones- Better when compared to the Beatles. More hardcore, and still sounds fresh to date. (I was listening to "Brown Sugar" live in 2003. It still sounds good)
The Stones were probably the #2 band of the '60's, and their rivalry with the Beatles (much better than the '90s Blur vs Oasis rivalry) pushed both bands to produce incredible material. In the end though, its definitely The Beatles for me--they covered a wider spectrum of music, were consistently innovative and influential, never setting into a particular groove, but always seeking new sounds and styles. Plus they were the base on which the Stones marketing machine (Basically Andrew Loog Oldham) could play contrast to (Would you let your daughter go out with a Rolling Stone?).
There's just something about the Stones. And Keith Richards cannot be killed by conventional weapons...
reminds me of "get him to the greek" ~ british rock stars just don't die
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Stones!!
