Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
2,098 posts, read 3,525,678 times
Reputation: 998

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownstoneNY View Post
Metrolink is a total joke. They run a grand total of 7 trains to DTLA on the Orange County Line on rush hour mornings (before noon). 10 trains to DTLA on rush hour mornings on the San Bernardino Line. Both have gaps of multiple hours in the middle of the day. And those are the two busiest lines in the system.

Compare that to, e.g., the Montclair-Boonton Line, which runs 16 trains to NY-Penn and another 14 trains to Hoboken before noon every day. Or 27 trains to NY-Penn and 23 to Hoboken before noon on the Morris and Essex Line. Or 31 trains to Secaucus and Hoboken on the Main and Bergen County Lines before noon.
I wouldn't say it's a total joke as I said, works for some but it's not all things to all people (neither is NJT.) The issue is that the last train for some of the lines out of DTLA is 6:30pm. What if you wanted to go out or work late?

Not sitting in traffic though? Priceless. That's why it has to be great for those in OC and Eastern LA who make it work.

Although problem with NJT is the fact that driving and parking to a hub station takes less time than riding some of these commuter lines when you have to make all these stops in bumble**** towns. When I lived in Warren driving to Newark and taking NJT was a faster option into midtown than taking the train to Gilette. Not to mention that it's actually cheaper to do what I did over riding the train all the way to NY Penn from Gilette everyday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
2,098 posts, read 3,525,678 times
Reputation: 998
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownstoneNY View Post
Fixed that for you.
I think the issue with the ARC tunnel was two things:

1. The underground stop was under Macy's -- excavation and construction would been a logistical, timely, and costly nightmare.

2. The funding for the ARC tunnel was to be paid full-on by NJer's.

There's always something with these projects. It can't be done with a direct approach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:36 PM
 
3,984 posts, read 7,077,463 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by cm5878 View Post
I am relatively new to commuting to Manhattan, but I still cannot get over the fact that there is one tunnel into the city and one tunnel out of the city as far as NJ Transit and Amtrak go.
There was plans to build a new tunnel...hmmm...some Governor shot it down.

And he lied about NJ paying for it all. The GAO said we'd be on hook for 14%, not 70% as Tubby claimed. Now we're at full capacity under the Hudson with nothing being planned whatsoever in the future. He's so short-sighted about certain things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
2,098 posts, read 3,525,678 times
Reputation: 998
Got some links to that that up, EB? Or are you still sitting around like this:

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 02:47 PM
 
31,910 posts, read 26,989,302 times
Reputation: 24816
Quote:
Originally Posted by cm5878 View Post
I am relatively new to commuting to Manhattan, but I still cannot get over the fact that there is one tunnel into the city and one tunnel out of the city as far as NJ Transit and Amtrak go.
Well there is only a single tunnel into NJ because as with much of the rest of the system neither that state nor New York built much of the infrastructure.


The Pennsylvania Railroad (PRR) built the tunnel, Penn Station and much if not all the ROW for their needs, passenger and or freight rail service. Later Amtrak and New Jersey inherited and or purchased in the wake of Pennsy's demise.

Like any other private railroad or company for that matter, then the PRR wanted funds for infrastructure projects it could float bonds or sell stock to fund, Amtrak does not have that sort of heft so the only place to turn are the two main states involved, New Jersey and New York.

New York City is making lots of noises to "recreate" the old and demolished Penn Station by using the Farley Post Office and now it seems wanting to tear down MSG, but building new tunnels is not high on their agenda. And why would it as the benefits would mostly go to New Jersey and beyond.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 04:06 PM
 
3,984 posts, read 7,077,463 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freshflakes757 View Post
Got some links to that that up, EB? Or are you still sitting around like this:
Look it up Fishflakes. Unless it cuts too much into your EasternEuropeanBrides.com time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Northville, MI
11,879 posts, read 14,211,423 times
Reputation: 6381
Quote:
Originally Posted by EBWick View Post
EasternEuropeanBrides.com
Thanks for the site. Most Chic's look very sexy .
Spoiler
I would like to get laid at least once . BUT I CANT . LOL, FAIL WHALE

Anyways, NJT should learn from the Swedes on how to maintain electric lines in cold weather:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZfwXJlLr_0

Last edited by Adi from the Brunswicks; 01-29-2014 at 04:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 04:35 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
2,098 posts, read 3,525,678 times
Reputation: 998
Quote:
Originally Posted by EBWick View Post
Look it up Fishflakes. Unless it cuts too much into your EasternEuropeanBrides.com time.
I'm not finding any links. I think you are making it up because you are a cranky democrat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 04:44 PM
 
1,221 posts, read 2,111,691 times
Reputation: 1766
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradykp View Post
well, until recently, there wasn't a compelling reason to build more, especially given the cost. but it would have been nice if in the past decade they did. now, we're stuck at capacity, and the ARC tunnel was cancelled based on faulty overrun predictions.
ARC tunnel was largely a crap idea anyway, given that it was a dead-end with no access to the rest of the network, or crucially....the train yards. Giving it limited capacity and use. It was also going to dead end in a location physically quite a long walk from the existing Penn Station facilities.

Gateway is a much better concept, and more useful to all parties.

None of this excuses Christie taking the money away and using it to band-aid the Highway Trust Fund instead of having to actually fix it's inadequate funding. The money should have been held onto and used for Gateway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 04:48 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
2,098 posts, read 3,525,678 times
Reputation: 998
Quote:
Originally Posted by millerm277 View Post
ARC tunnel was largely a crap idea anyway, given that it was a dead-end with no access to the rest of the network, or crucially....the train yards. Giving it limited capacity and use. It was also going to dead end in a location physically quite a long walk from the existing Penn Station facilities.

Gateway is a much better concept, and more useful to all parties.

None of this excuses Christie taking the money away and using it to band-aid the Highway Trust Fund instead of having to actually fix it's inadequate funding. The money should have been held onto and used for Gateway.
That new Newark Airport (EWR) PATH station seems like a giant waste of money as well. There is already a stop in place via NJ Transit to connect to the terribly inadquate Airtrain. The new stop will connect to the Journal Square line, but the NJ Transit rail already serves the same damn purpose of getting people to midtown.

To think: Once they build that waste of a station it's STILL going to take like 50-60 minutes to get to midtown!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top