Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm not sure what I think about Booker, I know he's a people person. I like the way he talks. I would probably consider voting for him despite him being liberal.
We're lacking in "candidates most people have heard of who can speak eloquently and passionately." E. Warren is too polarizing. Cory may not fit this to a tee, but I can't think of better options off hand.
Booker voted for the Iran deal, he even bite his own tongue saying it was a "no brainer" to go along with Obama and Clinton on this one. Obama, Clintons, Bushes are all siding with the establishment on invading Iraq. Trump was against Iraq invasion way back in the 90s.
The Clintons wanted to build a wall when they were in the white house but the establishment didn't want it so the idea died. Here we have Trump who ran against the establishment in both parties and won. Booker is just another Yes man to the establishment as demonstrated he had no analytical thinking with the bills he's voted in favor of that were bad for the country.
Iraq got free money from us and get to keep the nukes and were boasting about it.
Trump 2020. We need someone that is anti-establishment as the president and he's shown that he is just that. The media hates him and so is the establishment in both parties.
It would be much better to wait for Bookstein another 4 years. He would fail again Trumpenstein. Would be much harder for him to make a second comeback.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.