Quote:
Originally Posted by TNRyan23
I have interest in NOLA life but no one ever answers my posts in this forum.  |
Well, feel free to ask any questions. I'll answer them.
As far as the main subject goes, Austin vs. New Orleans, I was a resident native of New Orleans until Katrina, and I've been in Austin most of since (six horrible months in rural Massachusetts.) I can't wait to get back to New Orleans, (unfortunately, not possible right now, something I'm quite angry about), but I also love Austin. So I can comment honestly.
They are very different places. I know that you said your husband had a degree involved with the police, and had formerly been an EMT/medic, right? I don't know if he intends to look for a job as a police officer, but I can tell you this, it would be a trade-off. I'm not sure, but I think New Orleans police officers get paid more, but the work would be harder. Being a police officer is dangerous in any city, so I wouldn't say that NOLA would be specifically more dangerous, but some might consider it so. As far as quality goes, I've been pretty impressed with both the NOPD and the APD about equally.
New Orleans Pros: New Orleans has much better food, and much more culture. Lot's of great music. Additionally, it has more history and atmosphere. It's hard to explain, a lot of the good qualities of New Orleans are intangibles that are hard to put into words. Basically, it's a much older city, and feels like it. Everything is Austin is new new new latest latest latest. Not anything wrong with that, it's a matter of taste. New Orleans has a more varied art scene, aimed in more directions. New Orleans is more laid back and relaxed. People tend to be a lot more polite or formal. It's more "southern," but it's also more urban. People who expect New Orleans to be more "country" as they say, are very disappointed. It's a fairly dense city, and very urban. There is, however, a lot of green, and it's very natural. There's trees on just about every neutral ground, (call them "medians" and everyone will know you're not from around here.) and lots of the streets are tree-lined. The zoo is fantastic, and the Aquarium was pretty good before the storm. I know it's been rebuilt, but I haven't been since. The zoo got through clean. The museum is also very good. Lot's of stuff is open 24hrs.
New Orleans Cons: New Orleans is rough town. I love the place, but I will fully admit that. It's not as dangerous as it's perceived to be, and it's mainly a function that the bad areas are *very bad*, not that overall it's more dangerous. Some people love the look of the city, considering it old world charm, but some think it looks more "run down." The weather can be pretty bad. Summers are hot and wet with a lot of thunderstorms, late winter is cold, wet, and windy. Autumn is the dry season, and warm to cool, but short. Spring is warm and wet, and very short. The weather is also very unpredictable. In the summer, it can be warm, sunny and humid in the morning, torrential thunderstorms in the afternoon, cool and sunny in the evening, and then warm and extremely humid at night. That's not uncommon. There can be freak heatwaves in the winter and fall. One year it was over 80 on Christmas eve, and the next year we had snow flurries for Christmas. Directions can be confusing until you get used to them. (Streets start out parallel, but end up perpendicular while everything still looks gridded. To go from the east bank to the west bank, you drive southeast.
Austin Pros: Very vibrant. Has a lot of tradition and some history, but much of it doesn't seem to go much past the 60's. Lot's of great music. People very friendly, but can get a bit "macho." (Hey, it *is* Texas. :-) ) Weather is better, for the most part, and much less humid. There is a lot to do, especially if you're the outdoorsy type. Much more varied landscape. Hills north of the city, and it's only a short ride to a lot more outdoorsy stuff just out of town. A lot more open space. Pretty good bus system. Much more modern. Very accepting of "weirdness." Food very varied, even if the quality is not as good. You'll find more here than NOLA if you're into health food or vegetarianism.
Austin Cons: When the weather does get bad, it gets really bad. Traffic is worse, and the highway system very chaotic. The roads overall are chaotic, and it can be difficult to get places, especially if you just got here, and you get lost. Except for the center of the city, few of the streets, except for main roads go all the way through, most are very short, and curve, so it's difficult off the main roads. Can be a bit like a giant suburb once you get out of the center part of the city, which some people find good ,but I don't particularly like. Lot's of anti-hispanic racism on the radio and such, which, even if it's not directly against you, can get very tiresome. Lot's of subtle and not-so-subtle racism as well. For example, one of my best friends is hispanic. I've had people openly refer to him as, "Your friend, the illegal," or asked me if "he's illegal." (And since I know some of you are wondering, no, he's not.) That seems to be most of Texas nowadays, though.
They talk a lot about "greenspace" but it seems a bit artificial. Big blocks of green separate by big blocks of concrete. People tend to drive very agressively, and sometimes, just insanely. I've actually seen more problems with DWI here that I did in NOLA, despite more alcohol and no last call in NOLA. Very few things are 24hrs.
Speaking of racism, someone suggested Covington or Mandeville instead of New Orleans, can't quite remember which. I'd advise against either one. For one thing, both towns are hardcore "Duke Country." Lots of racism, very right wing. In this case, mixed with a lot of old-fashioned country club snobbery. (FWIW other areas around New Orleans to avoid as Duke Country, Chalmette, (thought it was getting better, recent news I heard says probably not, which was really disappointing) Mereaux, Gretna, and parts of Metairie (some parts of Metairie are not that bad, last I heard) Also, the commute across the Causeway is quite hard. Most of it is a long, featureless bridge. (The Lake is beautiful, in my opinion, but it can get dull over the bridge, which can make it seem longer.)
Some stuff that balances out: Both are progressive in their own way, and libertarian in their own way. The difference is very hard to explain. Austin is libertarian in that big, open-sky, outdoors and leave me alone sort of way. New Orleans is libertarian in that libertine artist sort of way. Both have all of the good and bad that that implies.
Also, the roaches? Yeah, New Orleans have scary, flying 3" cockroaches with no fear of humans, but you only see the a couple of times a year, and one good swat squishes them. Austin has these little tiny things that travel in packs, and and *nothing* seems to get rid of them. And they seem active all year. I think if you measure by weight, you have the same amount of total roaches per year. In New Orleans, you just get more at once.
Remember, all of the above is an opinion. (Except the climate in New Orleans and the traffic in Austin. Those are absolute facts.
) I'm not the most average guy in the world, but I am honest, and I like both places.
Pentalarc
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. 
Linear Mode
