Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-16-2017, 07:27 PM
 
1,342 posts, read 2,008,169 times
Reputation: 2545

Advertisements

Once again we are getting our pockets picked ......




https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/n...ease.html?_r=0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-16-2017, 07:43 PM
 
3,699 posts, read 3,857,841 times
Reputation: 2614
Start making people who brings kids/babies/infants on the train pay their fair share. Even if it's 1/4 the price of a regular fair, babies and children take up room and resources. Just throwing it out there as an alternate source of revenue. It's very unfair to those of us that choose not to breed and have to share the morning subway commutes these days with people bringing their 2000 dollar strollers on the train hogging up all that space. If you can afford to raise kids in the city, you can afford to pay their fares. "child fares" make it like 50 cents?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2017, 08:09 PM
 
15,867 posts, read 14,495,108 times
Reputation: 11984
Actually, it's the transit riders who are doing the pocket picking. They're getting a ride a well below the cost of that ride being provided.

The MTA should just bite the bullet and raise fares so that they cover at least 100% of operating costs, and at least some of the capital costs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sithlord72 View Post
Once again we are getting our pockets picked ......




https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/n...ease.html?_r=0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 08:11 AM
 
Location: New York, NY
12,791 posts, read 8,300,808 times
Reputation: 7112
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
Actually, it's the transit riders who are doing the pocket picking. They're getting a ride a well below the cost of that ride being provided.

The MTA should just bite the bullet and raise fares so that they cover at least 100% of operating costs, and at least some of the capital costs.
And what good would that do? The idea is to give people an incentive to actually use the system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 08:16 AM
 
274 posts, read 297,895 times
Reputation: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
Actually, it's the transit riders who are doing the pocket picking. They're getting a ride a well below the cost of that ride being provided.

The MTA should just bite the bullet and raise fares so that they cover at least 100% of operating costs, and at least some of the capital costs.
Bingo. Everyone wants a handout... How about raising to 120% of costs so we can actually pay for new transit improvements and investments, like what was done before the government got involved in the business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 08:18 AM
 
Location: New York, NY
12,791 posts, read 8,300,808 times
Reputation: 7112
Quote:
Originally Posted by fedguy2 View Post
Bingo. Everyone wants a handout... How about raising to 120% of costs so we can actually pay for new transit improvements and investments, like what was done before the government got involved in the business.
And how many people would actually use the system?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 09:44 AM
 
25,556 posts, read 23,990,209 times
Reputation: 10120
Quote:
Originally Posted by pierrepont7731 View Post
And how many people would actually use the system?
Well it would solve overcrowding issues. The MTA kept prices on the trains low for so long that it led to deferred maintenance and by the 80s the system was literally falling apart. Maintaining the system costs money, and it has to be paid either via fares or taxes on everyone else. Either way there is no free lunch. Keeping fares low means that the state levies taxes on things such as real estate (this leads to higher rents and the higher cost of good and services) and on gasoline (everything delivered goes up because trucks are paying more due to the gasoline tax).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 09:46 AM
 
25,556 posts, read 23,990,209 times
Reputation: 10120
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
Actually, it's the transit riders who are doing the pocket picking. They're getting a ride a well below the cost of that ride being provided.

The MTA should just bite the bullet and raise fares so that they cover at least 100% of operating costs, and at least some of the capital costs.
Never fear, with price increases every two years the MTA will get there. The MTA should also maximize leasing out it's real estate portfolio. In recent years they've gotten better at renting out space in their stations. This needs to dramatically increase.

The MTA gets income from Hudson Yards. Sunnyside yards should similarly be decked over and developed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 09:48 AM
 
Location: New York, NY
12,791 posts, read 8,300,808 times
Reputation: 7112
Quote:
Originally Posted by NyWriterdude View Post
Well it would solve overcrowding issues. The MTA kept prices on the trains low for so long that it led to deferred maintenance and by the 80s the system was literally falling apart. Maintaining the system costs money, and it has to be paid either via fares or taxes on everyone else. Either way there is no free lunch. Keeping fares low means that the state levies taxes on things such as real estate (this leads to higher rents and the higher cost of good and services) and on gasoline (everything delivered goes up because trucks are paying more due to the gasoline tax).
People are still driving even with the low fares. I think raising the fares as high as some are calling for would mean even more congestion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 11:01 AM
 
15,867 posts, read 14,495,108 times
Reputation: 11984
Given the fact that the system is running at or over capacity at peak times, there is no need to give people incentives to use the system. In point of fact, there's really no alternative to using the system. Given traffic and parking costs, no one is going to trade transit for driving, even at higher fares. What will happen is that people who can't afford it will be squeezed out of the city. This would be a good thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pierrepont7731 View Post
And what good would that do? The idea is to give people an incentive to
actually use the system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top