Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Non-Romantic Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2017, 08:37 AM
 
Location: God's Country
5,182 posts, read 5,251,926 times
Reputation: 8689

Advertisements

Here's a person who goes through the effort of carrying around a life inside the womb, painfully gives birth, changes diapers, feeds, and raises a child. Such a person must be a nurturer; and after all of that turns on the child. Not saying that I'm so ignorant as to believe that such people don't exist; it's just that they exist in far greater numbers than I realized.


Color me disillusioned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2017, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Wonderland
67,650 posts, read 60,925,505 times
Reputation: 101083
There are some really damaged, disturbed people out there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2017, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,907,290 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathrynAragon View Post
There are some really damaged, disturbed people out there.
Ain't that the truth! All too many people have children who are psychologically and/or financially just not equipped to do so. The mentally ill are the least likely to have the lucidity to be self aware and to say to themselves, "Hey, it would not be fair to the child for me to have one."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2017, 09:23 AM
 
Location: Finally the house is done and we are in Port St. Lucie!
3,487 posts, read 3,338,908 times
Reputation: 9913
I think it is more of the "psychologically" rather than the financial. I was not financially equipped to have kids but I did a damn fine job raising them. They may not have had all the 'stuff' that other kids had but they had food and LOVE.

People are expected to procreate and add kids to the family unit. Some are looking for that unconditional love that having a child brings. They are not all able to deal with the reality of actually having to take care of that child.

Then you have those that feel like the child is their property rather than a human being. More of a status symbol like trying to be like the 'normal' family.

God help the child that is born to a parent that didn't really want to be a parent but bowed to the pressure of a spouse or society.

My bio mom should never have had kids. But if she hadn't, I wouldn't have had my kids or grandkids. We have to make the conscious decision to break the cycle of abuse though. It Can Be Done.

I am proof.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2017, 09:45 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,211 posts, read 107,904,670 times
Reputation: 116159
OP, some of this phenom is multi-generational; a mom is abusive to her kid, and that kid grows up to repeat the abuse upon becoming a parent. But some mothers aren't nurturing from the get-go; they don't have the psychological wherewithal for that, so they neglect their babies. Also, the culture used to kind of reinforce that. Don't assume that parents start out nurturing, then for some mysterious reason "turn" on their kids.

The custom used to be to isolate the baby in its own room, and to let it cry. In fact, in the Victorian era, the "conventional wisdom" was you were supposed to ignore the baby's cries to some extent, because to respond immediately to a cry was considered "spoiling" the child. Babies were fed on an adult schedule, or something approximating that, not a newborn's schedule. This belief that babies shouldn't be fed when they needed to be fed (or diaper-changed) was passed down through generations through much of the 20th Century.

When baby-care expert Dr. Spock published a book in the 50's saying that parents should feed the baby according to the baby's schedule, as the baby demanded, it was considered to be radical, and was rejected by many parents. Later, the Vietnam War protests and the hippie movement were blamed on Dr. Spock's "permissive" child care philosophy. Feeding a baby when it cried was considered "permissive" and overly-indulgent. Western culture went through a very long phase when nurturance was not encouraged.

Barbaric, no? And people wonder why our society is so full of personality disorders and other psych issues.

Last edited by Ruth4Truth; 03-04-2017 at 10:04 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2017, 09:52 AM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,650 posts, read 48,040,180 times
Reputation: 78427
Just because a woman can get pregnant or man has viable sperm does not mean that they are qualified to be a parent. There are a lot of pregnancies out there that were not planned for. They happened because sex happens and sometimes people are not as careful as they should be.

So, you end up with a child who was never wanted, who has parents that weren't qualified to raise a child.

It's not like only good parents are allowed to reproduce.

I suspect that planned for pregnancies are actually in the minority in this country. There are all the out of wedlock births and very often married couples have a surprise pregnancy. Some of those unplaned kids are going to be stuck with unqualified or missing parents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2017, 10:01 AM
 
5,097 posts, read 6,349,198 times
Reputation: 11750
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvert Hall '62 View Post
Here's a person who goes through the effort of carrying around a life inside the womb, painfully gives birth, changes diapers, feeds, and raises a child. Such a person must be a nurturer; and after all of that turns on the child. Not saying that I'm so ignorant as to believe that such people don't exist; it's just that they exist in far greater numbers than I realized.


Color me disillusioned.




Wrong, that person does not need to be a nurturer. It's never just the mother if the father is in the house too. It is a family system that ef's people up. Unless, of course, the mother is the only care giver. And if she is screwy, chances are you will be too. Not always but a fair percentage.


There are a lot of people who should not be having or had children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2017, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Chicago area
18,759 posts, read 11,796,009 times
Reputation: 64167
You must have had a good mother Calvert (?) I was raised by not one, but two dysfunctional alcoholics. There was no love, only survival. They were just a sperm and an egg donor to me. Why they were irresponsible enough to reproduce is beyond me. Neither one was equipped to be a parent. This happens more often then you think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2017, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
15,218 posts, read 10,315,114 times
Reputation: 32198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvert Hall '62 View Post
Here's a person who goes through the effort of carrying around a life inside the womb, painfully gives birth, changes diapers, feeds, and raises a child. Such a person must be a nurturer; and after all of that turns on the child. Not saying that I'm so ignorant as to believe that such people don't exist; it's just that they exist in far greater numbers than I realized.


Color me disillusioned.


As sad as it is at least I know I wasn't alone in having a dysfunctional family. I'm still a little surprised when I read some of these threads about their horrible mothers. Mine wasn't horrible, she just wasn't there from when I was 5 till I was in my late teens. Very unheard of back when I was growing up in the 60's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2017, 10:46 AM
 
13,981 posts, read 25,954,920 times
Reputation: 39926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvert Hall '62 View Post
Here's a person who goes through the effort of carrying around a life inside the womb, painfully gives birth, changes diapers, feeds, and raises a child. Such a person must be a nurturer; and after all of that turns on the child. Not saying that I'm so ignorant as to believe that such people don't exist; it's just that they exist in far greater numbers than I realized.


Color me disillusioned.
I wouldn't say they upset me, they annoy me, and I read them with a large grain of salt. You don't have to spend that much time on C-D to conclude vast numbers of mothers are narcissistic, bi-polar, depressed, or cold, despite the rates of mental illness between the sexes is fairly even, and men have much higher rates of true narcissism.

Mothers are apparently expected to nurture from cradle to grave. When they conclude they have done their job and it's time for the adult child to handle their own affairs, they are deemed one or more of the above. When they want to pursue their own interests, they are selfish and narcissistic. When they begin to show signs of aging, they are needy and demented. Be kind to them.

And while true childhood abuse certainly occurs, I don't think those that have survived it are the ones posting here. Victims are far likelier to suffer from homelessness, be poorly educated, and unemployed. They're struggling to survive, not complaining that their mother is a pain in the butt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Non-Romantic Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top