Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should North Carolina drop safety inspections
Yes 13 43.33%
No 17 56.67%
Not sure 0 0%
Dont care 0 0%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-26-2013, 03:49 PM
 
3,065 posts, read 8,900,057 times
Reputation: 2092

Advertisements

I remember reading a study showing that inspections do nothing to improve highway safety. It's just another revenue stream
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2013, 03:55 PM
 
11,113 posts, read 19,547,135 times
Reputation: 10175
Quote:
Originally Posted by macjr82 View Post
I remember reading a study showing that inspections do nothing to improve highway safety. It's just another revenue stream

Legitimate emissions testing on older cars should be a priority. Not only for highway safety, but more so for health reasons ! nothing worse than riding behind an old beater with no muffler and/or smoking and spewing disgusting fumes into my well kept vehicle and my lungs. geesh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2013, 05:18 PM
 
1,826 posts, read 2,496,334 times
Reputation: 1811
I just don't like the tinting restrictions but otherwise I have no problem with the inspections. Once every 2 years would be nice though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2013, 06:03 PM
 
12,573 posts, read 15,565,273 times
Reputation: 8960
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunnyKayak View Post
I wish cars would give you indication when a tail light is blown. There is no way to know if your always in drivers seem and drive alone most of the time.
Many European makes have bulb failure warning, even my old '89. It doesn't tell you which bulb is out, but a with little uncommon sense it can be quickly diagnosed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 04:04 PM
 
1 posts, read 1,200 times
Reputation: 10
Default we need inspections

I feel a lot safer knowing that within the previous year most of the cars on NC hiways passed a safety inspection. Has anything been mentioned about an increase in auto insurance if the state does not have safety inspections? If I were in law enforcement, I would feel a lot better being able to see inside a vehicle I stopped or for that matter just being able to see in the car pulling up beside me. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 04:25 PM
 
3,065 posts, read 8,900,057 times
Reputation: 2092
Despite other states' moves, Pennsylvania's vehicle inspection program going strong | PennLive.com


Quote:
The Program Evaluation Division of the North Carolina Legislature said flatly, "The safety inspection program is not effective."
"Nearly three decades of research has failed to conclusively show that mechanical defects are a significant cause of motor vehicle accidents or that safety inspections significantly reduce accident rates," the report said.
Ironically, while Washington relied on those findings, the North Carolina legislature decided to leave that state’s program intact.
John Turcotte, director of the agency that conducted the study, said those who favored continuing the program provided anecdotal evidence of its effectiveness. Moreover, the North Carolina Highway Patrol was in favor of preserving the status quo. To Turcotte, long-held beliefs triumphed over facts in North Carolina.
Key points from the North Carolina report:
  • More than a dozen states repealed inspection programs after the federal government removed its leverage over the states by saying such programs were no longer needed to receive federal highway money.
  • The state of Nebraska found that the number of crashes caused by vehicle defects actually went down after the program was scrapped in 1982.
  • The North Carolina experience shows that the number of crashes attributable to mechanical condition equaled 1 percent of the state’s auto accidents.
The study carried some weight in Washington, where district officials say they relied on it, and the district’s own motor vehicles department, in making their decision to cancel inspections.
But since the 2009 elimination of the program, an influential City Council member, Jim Graham, has expressed concerns about the effects of the change on auto safety. Graham chairs the council’s public works and transportation committee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 04:36 PM
 
Location: zippidy doo dah
915 posts, read 1,625,974 times
Reputation: 1992
Quote:
Originally Posted by macjr82 View Post
I remember reading a study showing that inspections do nothing to improve highway safety. It's just another revenue stream

I have seen similar studies. If inspections made the driving environment safer, then i would support it. But that is not the conclusion reached by many states who have either abandoned or not instituted inspections.

In reality, inspections seem to generate revenue for those who do car repairs. I would think there is a strong lobby to continue inspections for this reason. That is nothing to do with safety.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
1,051 posts, read 2,298,924 times
Reputation: 1054
I agree with some of the above posters, keep the inspections but make it semi- or tri-annually.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Winston-Salem
4,218 posts, read 8,532,029 times
Reputation: 4494
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSS94 View Post
but make it semi- or tri-annually.
I think you mean bi- or tri-annual.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 06:42 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,988,469 times
Reputation: 43666
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadpony View Post
I think you mean bi- or tri-annual.
How about NO scheduled inspections?
When vehicles change hands will be often enough.

The key is to then do an actual and thorough safety inspection:
• Steering system • Wheel alignment • Suspension • Brake system • Wheels / tires
• Fuel system • Exhaust system • Bumpers • Fenders
• Lights • Electrical system • Mirrors • Glazing (windows) • Wipers
• Hood / catches • Door handle latches • Floor / trunk pans
• Speedometer / odometer • Gear shift indicator • Driver seat • Safety belts
• Motor mounts • Universal and CV (constant velocity) joints
• Emissions equipment
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top