Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2016, 04:56 AM
 
Location: Finland
24,128 posts, read 24,821,814 times
Reputation: 11103

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aery11 View Post
My daughter probably falls in the millennial category at age 33 now. When she was little, few people had digital cameras - we used film that had to be developed (unless we had our own developing expertise and equipment at home) at the camera store.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AfternoonCoffee View Post
^^This^^has been driving me bananas!!!

People keep using "Millennial" and "kids today" interchangeably, and as a derisive, catch-all label for any behavior or activity they personally don't like.

"Kids today" could apply to anyone, I would argue, that is a teen or younger. Maybe you could stretch "kids today" to include "college kids" but only the only overlap with "Millennials" would be the oldest teens.

"Millennials," according to Pew research are people born between 1980 and 2000. Some arguments can be made for as early as 1978 based on the fact many people from that birth year had not yet entered the working world when the Millennium occurred, nor when 9/11 occurred. Those events shaped "Millennials" adult lives.

The majority of "Millennials" are in their 20s to mid-30s, working, buying houses, buying insurance, going to grad school, having kids, some are living with roommates or parents...you know, mostly doing the same stuff young adults have done for generations.

Millennials | Pew Research Center
I am born in 1982, and I have a reaaaaaally hard time to consider me a 'Millennial', or relate to a person born in 1995 for example. The time between 1980-2000 was so revolutionary in advances of technology that the whole time frame seems ridiculous.
We didn't grow up with internet and cellphones. My first touch with computers were my granddad's Commodore 64. We are the last cohort who used land-line telephones and memorised our friends home's phone numbers. We had VHS videos, C-cassettes, I remember the Soviet Union and the Gulf War. We had our own favourite Spice Girl.

Kids born in 1995, they might not even rembember 9/11. They played children's online games at the age when we played with Legos. They don't remember the dial-up sound of the internet modem, they've had cellphones, even smart phones since the beginning. They think it's crazy that someone like me recorded radio shows on c-cassettes. In the case of Western Europe, they don't remember that there were national currencies before the Euro.

No, I refuse to be called a Millennial. My cohort is some kind of limbo generation between X and Millennials, the transition period between the physical and the digital.



Have you used one of these? No? Then you are a Millennial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2016, 06:07 AM
 
6,191 posts, read 7,361,153 times
Reputation: 7570
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
Give me a break. There are millions of pictures of kids sitting on potties on film before digital. And in the bathtub with brothers and sisters. It was like a right of passage. Some how today's special snowflakes need their safe rooms and trigger warnings. Who truly gives a flying fig if they are on social media except a special snowflake.

Really, give it a break. I'm willing to bet that virtually everyone here is in such a picture, and that picture has been shared numerous times with family and friends. It's a big deal only if you make it so.


Give it a break?

Of course everyone has photos of them when they are younger. The difference is that twenty years ago it wouldn't be posted all over the internet. How many times does someone post something they think is cute or funny and the next thing you know it's viral, often embarrassing for some of those involved? Who are you to decide what is embarrassing for her? Some people have no problem posting pictures of themselves in certain situations and others do---I don't understand what's so difficult to understand about that.

Who gives a flying fig if they are on social media? Did you ever think people don't want to be on there? That makes them a special snowflake---NOT wanting to be on social media? You have some screwy thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 07:12 AM
 
7,992 posts, read 5,391,897 times
Reputation: 35568
I don't understand the mentality or joy a parent (or anyone) has to embarrass someone. It is like some sort of sick power trip.

If someone wants to share "an embarrassing" photo of themselves, that is their story to share, not someone else's story to share.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 07:29 AM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,928,903 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by city living View Post
Give it a break?

Of course everyone has photos of them when they are younger. The difference is that twenty years ago it wouldn't be posted all over the internet. How many times does someone post something they think is cute or funny and the next thing you know it's viral, often embarrassing for some of those involved? Who are you to decide what is embarrassing for her? Some people have no problem posting pictures of themselves in certain situations and others do---I don't understand what's so difficult to understand about that.

Who gives a flying fig if they are on social media? Did you ever think people don't want to be on there? That makes them a special snowflake---NOT wanting to be on social media? You have some screwy thinking.
I see the problem now, city living.

Your perspectives are constrained by your environment. Unlike my grandchidren.



P.S.

They also know what the bull is doing to that cow, and not embarrassed at all about it. Funny having my 3 year old granddaughter shouting out loud that the dog and the neighbors dogs are making puppies and are stuck together. Your children are probably protected from "that kind of stuff".

P.P.S.

As this is a PUBLIC forum, and I can't restrict who views it, unlike FaceBook. Notice no identifying features are given. Not even a license plate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Finland
24,128 posts, read 24,821,814 times
Reputation: 11103
Quote:
Originally Posted by city living View Post
Give it a break?

Of course everyone has photos of them when they are younger. The difference is that twenty years ago it wouldn't be posted all over the internet. How many times does someone post something they think is cute or funny and the next thing you know it's viral, often embarrassing for some of those involved? Who are you to decide what is embarrassing for her? Some people have no problem posting pictures of themselves in certain situations and others do---I don't understand what's so difficult to understand about that.

Who gives a flying fig if they are on social media? Did you ever think people don't want to be on there? That makes them a special snowflake---NOT wanting to be on social media? You have some screwy thinking.
I agree. There is a huge issue here. If parents post possibly embarrassing pictures online and share them with a 1000 facebook 'friends', you create a virtual footprint for your kid and he/she can't do anything about it. Or post a facebook status saying something about your that may be embarrassing in the future. Some parents don't understand that once you upload something on the net, there is no guarantee that you can take it offline. Ever.
Cyber bullying is a serious issue these days, and if the parents provide the bullies with material, it's even worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 07:41 AM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,185,020 times
Reputation: 32726
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
Apparently we see things differently. And that is OK.

Now, about that tea, oolong or jasmine?
Except that what I said is an actual fact. You can't compare an old photo in your own home to one posted on the internet for everyone to see. They aren't the same. The girl didn't ask her parents to destroy the photo so it no longer exists. She asked for it to be taken off the internet. If they had done that, it becomes like the old photo in the parents' closet, not able to be seen by the general public, and not doing any harm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 08:40 AM
 
Location: 415->916->602
3,143 posts, read 2,661,613 times
Reputation: 3872
Sometimes, the parents are the ones who act like little children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 08:59 AM
 
10,196 posts, read 9,892,275 times
Reputation: 24135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibbiekat View Post
Except that what I said is an actual fact. You can't compare an old photo in your own home to one posted on the internet for everyone to see. They aren't the same. The girl didn't ask her parents to destroy the photo so it no longer exists. She asked for it to be taken off the internet. If they had done that, it becomes like the old photo in the parents' closet, not able to be seen by the general public, and not doing any harm.
I shared a story earlier how my mom did take out the "embarrassing" photos of my sister and showed them to her boyfriends and my sister was mortified. It was bullying. This is bullying on a grand scale with use of the internet.

I really feel for the daughter. Because it did matter to her and her parents clearly knew that they were hurting her. That is the point of this whole thing. My sister wasnt wrong that it upset her...I think its valid to be mortified when someone is bullying you.

They have classes now teaching kids how to be safe online. We need classes for parents of how not to be jerks online.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 09:05 AM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,185,020 times
Reputation: 32726
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighFlyingBird View Post
I shared a story earlier how my mom did take out the "embarrassing" photos of my sister and showed them to her boyfriends and my sister was mortified. It was bullying. This is bullying on a grand scale with use of the internet.

I really feel for the daughter. Because it did matter to her and her parents clearly knew that they were hurting her. That is the point of this whole thing. My sister wasnt wrong that it upset her...I think its valid to be mortified when someone is bullying you.

They have classes now teaching kids how to be safe online. We need classes for parents of how not to be jerks online.
I agree!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Camberville
15,866 posts, read 21,452,288 times
Reputation: 28216
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
I see the problem now, city living.

Your perspectives are constrained by your environment. Unlike my grandchidren.



P.S.

They also know what the bull is doing to that cow, and not embarrassed at all about it. Funny having my 3 year old granddaughter shouting out loud that the dog and the neighbors dogs are making puppies and are stuck together. Your children are probably protected from "that kind of stuff".

P.P.S.

As this is a PUBLIC forum, and I can't restrict who views it, unlike FaceBook. Notice no identifying features are given. Not even a license plate.
What does this have to do with the topic? No identifying facial information is shown and they are, I don't know, NOT NAKED. Do their parents know you shared this?

My brother and sister-in-law do not want any photos of my niece online. None. My parents, however, kept posting photos after explicit instructions not to. Guess who doesn't get photos of their granddaughter (who they only see once a year) anymore?

Privacy matters, whether you think it's superfluous or not. I wouldn't care if my naked baby pictures were shared, but you better believe I would take full action if someone shared them without my consent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top