Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-09-2015, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Eastern UP of Michigan
1,204 posts, read 873,061 times
Reputation: 1292

Advertisements

I guessed 70%, but we (2) came in at 88%.

Teeny bit off topic but----- the section to list assets suggested adding in pension funds, which I did not do.
How do you determine the value of a pension(which we are fortunate to have) for this instance and for overall AA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2015, 09:48 AM
 
4,006 posts, read 6,040,241 times
Reputation: 3897
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyingsaucermom View Post
I responded about this in another thread. Says we're 77%. If you took away the kids we would be around 90%.
You should sell your kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2015, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Wooster, Ohio
4,142 posts, read 3,054,676 times
Reputation: 7280
Estimated 96%, calculated 96%.

I disagree about taxing wealth. The sliders would not let me do an infinite wealth exemption, and a zero wealth tax. If anything, we should tax debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2015, 10:07 AM
 
2,779 posts, read 5,501,383 times
Reputation: 5068
82 but without the kids 94. The kids are leaving eventually
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2015, 10:08 AM
 
5,342 posts, read 6,167,667 times
Reputation: 4719
77% @ 30.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2015, 10:13 AM
 
106,673 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164
they should have had an age factor. that is important. i had 40 years to get where i am , how can you compare that to someone 30 with 1/2 as much , they are doing great so far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2015, 10:18 AM
 
2,779 posts, read 5,501,383 times
Reputation: 5068
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
they should have had an age factor. that is important. i had 40 years to get where i am , how can you compare that to someone 30 with 1/2 as much , they are doing great so far.
Agreed. We're 38 with two kids, to compare us to a dual working empty nester couple in their late fifties seems kind of silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2015, 10:20 AM
 
5,342 posts, read 6,167,667 times
Reputation: 4719
I don't really get the household members section? If they mean adults I get it, but I don't get why your kids should be factored in (I don't have any now, but will in the near future). It has to do with wealth, not disposable income. Obviously if you have kids your disposable income is reduced, but it has no impact on your wealth at all aside from the fact that you can't contribute as much to retirement. It's not like your kids are contributors to the wealth and technically it won't be split between you and your kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2015, 10:22 AM
 
5,121 posts, read 6,803,843 times
Reputation: 5833
Does anyone know for "real assets" if you should include the actual value of your home or just the equity in it? Because that makes a huge difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2015, 10:22 AM
 
106,673 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164
equity only.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top