Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-09-2010, 02:21 PM
 
1,966 posts, read 4,350,895 times
Reputation: 1090

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by John23 View Post
This is part of the reason why the middle class has been crushed in this country. Serious matters (money management, and debt) have been turned into infotainment by the elite. Orman, Ramsey, Jim Cramer should not be like Judge Judy.

-The biggest issue all of these "experts" should be tackling is debt. That should be the main theme. Investing, stocks, 401k contributions, those are far down the list of importance if you're paying 18-25% or more on a credit card. These shows never emphasize how long it takes to pay off debt. That should be a constant and drilled into viewers minds....it's going to take you 9 years to pay off that $6,000 credit card debt paying the minimum. 9 years! 12 years! That should be a banner hung on these shows, hung on the ceiling. Do you want to be paying a bank CEO's salary for 9 years?

Ramsey does this with every caller asking them to break down their debt first then asking them what their income is including all household income. After that he tells people what to pay according to the figures given; however, he is consistent in saying the first thing is food, shelter, electricity then going after the lowest debt first.

-Another danger with debt is *assuming* you'll have a steady income during those 7 or 10 years, to pay that minimum payment. The volatility of the economy and debt isn't addressed. Many people have been sucked into something they don't understand. Too many blind assumptions.
If you listen to Ramsey, after getting the information he concludes whether the issue is a "income" issue or a "budget" issue. If it's the former then he will say "go out and deliver pizzas" or like he did with a caller tell her that she should print out business cards to clean houses in the wealthier part of town.

You can't assume anything today. People can only pay off their debt with the current income and they need to take a hard look at their finances to see whether their current income takes care of their needs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-09-2010, 02:38 PM
 
Location: State of Superior
8,733 posts, read 15,972,540 times
Reputation: 2869
That is the heart of the problem these days. The Middle Class has seen their wages stagnant , and everything escalate.... They are fast becoming a rare dying breed.... Income is at the basics of most peoples problems. Otherwise , there would be some built in cusion for the what ifs.

I grew up on a farm in the fifties, we were middle class , not poor , not rich , but there was always a way to make things work. We had no credit cards , health Insurance , or huge home payments. You saved for the lean years , and there were quite a few. You paid the difference when buying a new car with cash, and , when you wanted something and did not have the cash , the local store just put it on lay a way...........what have we created anyway ? ..A monster that has no end or beginning, just a revolving Peter rob to pay Paul rob society.... Its time to return to the old days for a while , maybe we all could learn a lesson or two.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2010, 08:22 AM
 
42 posts, read 88,343 times
Reputation: 17
^exactly

My parents paid the huge sum of $15k for their house on a 1 acre lot in 1975. If you wanted that today in the same area you'd pay $150k (thats a 1000% increase). That's an outrageous growth in price.

How about the price of cars? In 1975 you could buy an average new car for what? $3k? Now the average new car costs close to $30k. That's a 1000% increase.

Did their salaries increase by that amount over the same period?

YEAH RIGHT!

My mom's salary in 1975 was roughly $10k....when she retired in 2005 it was $36k. So her salary grew by 360% over approximately the same time period. That's a huge disparity. Her salary should have been $100k to actually keep up with the growth in price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2010, 09:12 AM
 
Location: State of Superior
8,733 posts, read 15,972,540 times
Reputation: 2869
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedFinancialAdvice View Post
^exactly

My parents paid the huge sum of $15k for their house on a 1 acre lot in 1975. If you wanted that today in the same area you'd pay $150k (thats a 1000% increase). That's an outrageous growth in price.

How about the price of cars? In 1975 you could buy an average new car for what? $3k? Now the average new car costs close to $30k. That's a 1000% increase.

Did their salaries increase by that amount over the same period?

YEAH RIGHT!

My mom's salary in 1975 was roughly $10k....when she retired in 2005 it was $36k. So her salary grew by 360% over approximately the same time period. That's a huge disparity. Her salary should have been $100k to actually keep up with the growth in price.
And we wonder why there are so many foreclosures, debt crisis , underwater auto loans. etc. Simple , the Middle Class has been squeezed to the point that they are living off credit cards at 30 per cent interest, just to stay above water enough to keep the wolf away from the door.

More is coming. The housing problem is getting worse. Florida thought the worst was over...now they are down again , outpacing Michigan as the worst off state in high unemployment....What needs to be done IS a redistribution of wealth in this Country. It starts from the top down.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2010, 09:33 AM
 
42 posts, read 88,343 times
Reputation: 17
^seems that the Titanic has sailed though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2010, 09:32 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
2,883 posts, read 5,903,190 times
Reputation: 2762
Quote:
Originally Posted by darstar View Post
You haven't listened to Suzy Orman much it seems. Most of her callers and her advice is realistic and to the point. Not what some people want to hear , but the truth...( I do agree she can be a bit grating at times , no Judge Judy however ).
I think they try to be too many things to too many people.

-Jim Cramer is all over the place on tv, trying to predict everything. From stocks, oil, the economy, to the what the FED is doing.

-Similar with Orman. With a fico kit, will and trust. But I bet 25-50% of her audience is in some sort of debt.

They can say that debt is bad, or don't get into it. What isn't emphasized is how long it'll take you to pay it off. How hard it is. How obscene bank profits have been.

It's like Judge Judy, in that it tries to present a complicated topic in a 30 minute or hour long show. Like a trial fit for television, only its finances fit for televsion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 07:30 AM
 
Location: State of Superior
8,733 posts, read 15,972,540 times
Reputation: 2869
Quote:
Originally Posted by John23 View Post
I think they try to be too many things to too many people.

-Jim Cramer is all over the place on tv, trying to predict everything. From stocks, oil, the economy, to the what the FED is doing.

-Similar with Orman. With a fico kit, will and trust. But I bet 25-50% of her audience is in some sort of debt.

They can say that debt is bad, or don't get into it. What isn't emphasized is how long it'll take you to pay it off. How hard it is. How obscene bank profits have been.

It's like Judge Judy, in that it tries to present a complicated topic in a 30 minute or hour long show. Like a trial fit for television, only its finances fit for televsion.
Most people find finances give them a headache. The attention span of the tipical American is very short...unless it watching " dancing with the Stars".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2010, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Fairfield, CT
6,981 posts, read 10,980,249 times
Reputation: 8822
Quote:
Originally Posted by John23 View Post
This is part of the reason why the middle class has been crushed in this country. Serious matters (money management, and debt) have been turned into infotainment by the elite. Orman, Ramsey, Jim Cramer should not be like Judge Judy.

-The biggest issue all of these "experts" should be tackling is debt. That should be the main theme. Investing, stocks, 401k contributions, those are far down the list of importance if you're paying 18-25% or more on a credit card. These shows never emphasize how long it takes to pay off debt. That should be a constant and drilled into viewers minds....it's going to take you 9 years to pay off that $6,000 credit card debt paying the minimum. 9 years! 12 years! That should be a banner hung on these shows, hung on the ceiling. Do you want to be paying a bank CEO's salary for 9 years?

-Another danger with debt is *assuming* you'll have a steady income during those 7 or 10 years, to pay that minimum payment. The volatility of the economy and debt isn't addressed. Many people have been sucked into something they don't understand. Too many blind assumptions.
Actually, I think Suze Orman deals with a lot of this stuff. She emphasizes the dangers of debt and warns people not to always count on their income being there.

Jim Cramer is of a different stripe. He seems more of an entertainer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2010, 07:10 PM
 
2,036 posts, read 4,252,717 times
Reputation: 3201
Quote:
Originally Posted by dazzleman View Post
Actually, I think Suze Orman deals with a lot of this stuff. She emphasizes the dangers of debt and warns people not to always count on their income being there.

Jim Cramer is of a different stripe. He seems more of an entertainer.
Pop financial talk are all entertainment. Some are more sincere than others in their motives, but its safe to say they are all modern day P.T Barnums of the financial world.

If they provide the training wheels to a more financially astute population though, so be it. The advice they give is 9 out of 10 times rather harmless (cramer being the exception, hes pretty dangerous).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2010, 10:57 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
2,883 posts, read 5,903,190 times
Reputation: 2762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spraynard Kruger View Post
Pop financial talk are all entertainment. Some are more sincere than others in their motives, but its safe to say they are all modern day P.T Barnums of the financial world.

If they provide the training wheels to a more financially astute population though, so be it. The advice they give is 9 out of 10 times rather harmless (cramer being the exception, hes pretty dangerous).
The danger with Cramer IMO is that you waste so much time. He advocates (or he use to) listening to conference calls, following earnings and all this "stuff" in an attempt to be a good investor.But time is money, and it doesn't make sense for most people. The concept of trying to outperform the market year after year is futile to most people, because they don't have the time or inclination.

Suze Orman is a better entertainer, but still its entertainment. I'd rather know the fundamentals of *what's* going on, and *how* vs who presents. If you can grasp the fundamentals, it doesn't matter who's presenting it to you.

-It's true people have short attention spans. And Cramer, Orman are giving people what they want(like the world wrestling federation giving people what they want). But do you want wrestlers giving you financial advise?

Considering the financial mess we're in (a $1.6 trillion deficit), wrestlers shouldn't be our main source of financial information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top