Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-03-2011, 11:50 AM
 
1,808 posts, read 3,189,800 times
Reputation: 3261

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by grannymontanny View Post
How do you guys carry your 100-400? I went to the park yesterday,and by end of an hour,my arm and shoulders were killing me from carrying it around. maybe a better shoulder strap?
I use a r-strap by black rapid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2011, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Wyoming
9,724 posts, read 21,225,548 times
Reputation: 14823
You might consider getting a monopod and cover the main section with water pipe insulation. I cover the main sections of my tripods (and monopod) with that, and it makes carrying them on my shoulders much more comfortable. The monopod would also give your camera a little support to help keep your images sharp.

I haven't used a camera strap in years, other than small hand-straps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2011, 07:37 AM
 
1,309 posts, read 2,814,129 times
Reputation: 2132
thanks for all feedback. i am getting a little more used to the weight of the thing. i think i will get a better strap tho. one that goes over the shoulder,and not the neck. i do have a monopod and will give that a try as well REALLY enjoying this lens!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2011, 07:55 AM
 
106,566 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
i always use a monopod for my heavy lenses. it makes the weight so easy to balance and carry. after a few trips to the zoo hand holding my 80- 200m f2.8 nikon lens its not something i want to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2011, 01:52 PM
 
Location: on top of a mountain
6,994 posts, read 12,728,690 times
Reputation: 3286
Quote:
Originally Posted by grannymontanny View Post
thanks for all feedback. i am getting a little more used to the weight of the thing. i think i will get a better strap tho. one that goes over the shoulder,and not the neck. i do have a monopod and will give that a try as well REALLY enjoying this lens!
I use a Think Tank Holster with Harness as I have a really bad neck problem. I have also customized straps so as not to have to have the weight around my neck.
Holster Camera Bag - Digital Holster Camera bags for Nikon, Canon
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2011, 01:53 PM
 
Location: on top of a mountain
6,994 posts, read 12,728,690 times
Reputation: 3286
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
i always use a monopod for my heavy lenses. it makes the weight so easy to balance and carry. after a few trips to the zoo hand holding my 80- 200m f2.8 nikon lens its not something i want to do.
what head do you use that supports the weight of a heavy lens on your monopod?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2011, 02:10 PM
 
106,566 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
i think its the manfrotto 484rc2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2011, 02:20 PM
 
Location: on top of a mountain
6,994 posts, read 12,728,690 times
Reputation: 3286
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
i think its the manfrotto 484rc2
wow....a ball head will support the weight of an 80-200mm?? I have always been told not to use a ball head as it can't hold up to the weight...hummm...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2011, 04:35 PM
 
106,566 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
i use it on both the monopod and my tripod and been using it for 4 years..... not only does it support the 80-200 but my d300 with flash mounted at the same time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2011, 05:44 PM
 
Location: Wyoming
9,724 posts, read 21,225,548 times
Reputation: 14823
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueflames50 View Post
wow....a ball head will support the weight of an 80-200mm?? I have always been told not to use a ball head as it can't hold up to the weight...hummm...

That's nonsense. A good ball head will support any lens you'll ever need. As an example, a Kirk BH-1 is rated to hold 50 pounds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top