Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-12-2013, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
328 posts, read 655,004 times
Reputation: 446

Advertisements

Tough one, but I'd unless you're doing video, save a couple hundred bucks and stick with the 7000 and use the extra money for a lens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-12-2013, 06:45 PM
 
106,673 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80164
It really depends what kind of photography you are doing. In our case my wife and i do lots of macro stuff.

We can use extension tubes with a macro lens and still do alot of cropping.

The d7100 can leave you with lots more pixels if you crop alot.

The auto focus system responds faster on the d7100 too. Trying to shoot flying insects can be trying at times with the d7000.

There is a big difference in speed between the d800 and the d7000 . The d7100 is closer to my d800 in that respect.

I am a big believer in starting out with at least the most current models in my price range .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2013, 10:36 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
328 posts, read 655,004 times
Reputation: 446
There is also a 1600+ price difference between the two. Thats a lot of dough, yo. You're talking whole different leagues here. I use a d5100 which has the same sensor as a d7000 and I've never once had a focusing problem or missed something because of focusing problems. It also has less focusing points than the d7000/7100. I also used a d60 for 3 years, which has 3 autofocus points, and never had a problem hitting my targets. Maybe it comes with the caliber of photographer you are, but were at the age where auto focus is quite peppy on most anything you buy. Now, according to amazon, a d7000 is about 900 bucks brand new, 1200 for the d7100...You could pick 7000's used pretty cheap these days, most of the time with a lens too. If you can afford the d7100, go for it, but the d7000 is still an outstanding piece of equipment. I wouldn't even consider buying the d600 or d800 until Nikon address's and corrects the oil spots on the sesnor problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 01:44 AM
 
106,673 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80164
d800 has no oil spot issues at all and i believe the d600 had that corrected a while ago.

if you shot a lot of insects or flowers with extension tubes the success rate of getting those shots increases drastically the faster the auto focus system locks on. trust me on this ,if you shot moving macro stuff you would see the difference.

i can lock on to an insect landing or taking off and get the shot while the d7000 is still hunting. the d7100 uses a different auto focus system more like the d800 than the older system the d7000 has.


we also find when using extension tubes on macro lenses hand held trying to lock focus can be so hard. the more length you add with tubes the harder it is to lock focus and the more dependant on a fast accurate focusing system you become.

shooting flowers without extension tubes can just be done by manually focusing so this discussion does not apply there.

what we learned to do is basically use the auto focus system to do all the work by us rocking back and forth holding the shutter down until focus is locked and the shutter fires..

the d800 system which is close to what the d7100 uses is far faster and accurate than the d7000 which can take quite a bit of rocking to grab hold.

that is why i say it matters what kind of photography you do. the cropping issue is a major factor in macro too.

in other types of photography the differences are not as apparent.

low light focusing is another area the d7100 is better than the d7000.

these are examples of the type of photography we do and these are all handheld letting the autofocus system grab. the less time you spend on focusing issues the more shots you can take in a scenerio.










Last edited by mathjak107; 08-13-2013 at 02:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 02:07 AM
 
106,673 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80164
[IMG][/IMG]





Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Powell, Oh
1,846 posts, read 4,742,295 times
Reputation: 1089
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
[IMG][/IMG]




Those are beautiful photos
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 06:30 AM
 
106,673 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80164
Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2013, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,019,978 times
Reputation: 62204
I have both the D7000 and the D7100. I take a lot of bird photos that need cropping for resizing. Otherwise, I was happy with the D7000. I use my Panasonic FZ150 ultrazoom for Macro because it gets the job done and it's lighter to hand-hold. In fact, right after Mathjak107's butterfly had his picture taken in NY, he flew to Tennessee, found the same kind of flower (?) and posed for me.

Panasonic FZ150 F5.2, Aperture Priority, 1/400, ISO 100 8/11/13



Nikon D7000 f11, Manual, 1/1250, ISO 2200 4/26/13



Nikon D7100 f13, Manual, 1/1250, ISO 2800 6/16/13



The 1/1250 is because on both days I was attempting to photograph flying birds and while I love Common Grackles, they like to walk in and out of my photos rather than fly. Even the ones on the post jump down rather than fly down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2013, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Powell, Oh
1,846 posts, read 4,742,295 times
Reputation: 1089
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
I have both the D7000 and the D7100. I take a lot of bird photos that need cropping for resizing. Otherwise, I was happy with the D7000. I use my Panasonic FZ150 ultrazoom for Macro because it gets the job done and it's lighter to hand-hold. In fact, right after Mathjak107's butterfly had his picture taken in NY, he flew to Tennessee, found the same kind of flower (?) and posed for me.

Panasonic FZ150 F5.2, Aperture Priority, 1/400, ISO 100 8/11/13



Nikon D7000 f11, Manual, 1/1250, ISO 2200 4/26/13



Nikon D7100 f13, Manual, 1/1250, ISO 2800 6/16/13



The 1/1250 is because on both days I was attempting to photograph flying birds and while I love Common Grackles, they like to walk in and out of my photos rather than fly. Even the ones on the post jump down rather than fly down.
lol

Thanks for the tips
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top