Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-28-2017, 07:13 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,557,509 times
Reputation: 6392

Advertisements

Quote:
The IRS said Wednesday that some homeowners who prepay local property taxes due in 2018 will be able to claim the deduction on this year's returns, but only if the taxes have already been assessed and billed. People can't guess at what next year's assessment might be, pay it now and claim a deduction for that amount.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/long-line...174906507.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-28-2017, 08:21 AM
gg gg started this thread
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 26,020,924 times
Reputation: 17378
Hope the IRS doesn't allow these wealthy people prepayments. Time to pony up the money and stop all the gimmicking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2017, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Lawrenceville, Pittsburgh
2,109 posts, read 2,163,237 times
Reputation: 1845
Quote:
Originally Posted by gg View Post
Hope the IRS doesn't allow these wealthy people prepayments. Time to pony up the money and stop all the gimmicking.
This is an issue that disproportionately affects the middle and upper-middle class. Wealthy folks make their money via investment income, dividends, and other passive methods. They also are much more likely to have trusts and corporations structured to efficiently manage their wealth.

The state and local tax deduction issue is very well illustrated by selltheburgh - if you make 100k and live in a home that is about average cost for your income in Allegheny county, you will likely benefit if the IRS allows for prepayment. Last I checked, $100K isn't "wealthy" (though it may seem like high income to some). To those who fall in this bucket, it now feels like "double taxation" is the standard. Double taxation was reduced for those who own businesses and increased for those who do not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2017, 09:44 AM
 
5,894 posts, read 6,891,939 times
Reputation: 4107
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoIsStanwix? View Post
This is an issue that disproportionately affects the middle and upper-middle class. Wealthy folks make their money via investment income, dividends, and other passive methods. They also are much more likely to have trusts and corporations structured to efficiently manage their wealth.

The state and local tax deduction issue is very well illustrated by selltheburgh - if you make 100k and live in a home that is about average cost for your income in Allegheny county, you will likely benefit if the IRS allows for prepayment. Last I checked, $100K isn't "wealthy" (though it may seem like high income to some). To those who fall in this bucket, it now feels like "double taxation" is the standard. Double taxation was reduced for those who own businesses and increased for those who do not.
Wealthy people will certainly have higher property tax bills due & passive income is also taxed so it’s not as if they are receiving any free lunch here.
I may not like the new tax bill personally for many reasons (though in the end I suspect it does reduce my taxes slightly) but if we’re being honest, this local/state/property tax cap still primarily only effects those that are doing better then most & it makes little real sense to be able to reduce one’s federal tax bill because of other taxes one pays. Everyone wants people to pay their fair share so long as it’s someone else paying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2017, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Manchester
3,110 posts, read 2,923,116 times
Reputation: 3728
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKyank View Post
Wealthy people will certainly have higher property tax bills due & passive income is also taxed so it’s not as if they are receiving any free lunch here.
I may not like the new tax bill personally for many reasons (though in the end I suspect it does reduce my taxes slightly) but if we’re being honest, this local/state/property tax cap still primarily only effects those that are doing better then most & it makes little real sense to be able to reduce one’s federal tax bill because of other taxes one pays. Everyone wants people to pay their fair share so long as it’s someone else paying.
My beef with the whole SALT deduction change is that in certain states and localities people have chosen to live with high taxes in order to build and pay for the system they desire. This deduction has been the way it has since the inception of the Federal Income Tax in 1913. These states and localities tend to be more urban, liberal, and vote democratic, which makes them prime for targeting by the current Congress and administration. It’s an easy way to collect more revenue for the federal government to help plug a deficit hole (although they still fail in doing so by $1.5 trillion) that benefits corporations and the extremely wealthy more than anyone else. Additionally, this removes power from the states by absorbing more taxable resources from the states and transfers it to the federal government.

For a party that use to be all about states rights and shrinking the federal government it is all very calculated. They are simultaneously shrinking the work and oversight done by the federal government, with plans to do “welfare reform”, while at the same time making a huge money grab from the states to pay for their own raiding of the federal coffers. If it wasn’t reality, it would make for a great book.

Does anyone know if Pgh and Allegheny county are assessing the taxes already? The catch with prepaying is that they have to be actually billed or they don’t count.

Last edited by PghYinzer; 12-28-2017 at 10:42 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2017, 10:47 AM
 
5,894 posts, read 6,891,939 times
Reputation: 4107
Quote:
Originally Posted by PghYinzer View Post
My beef with the whole SALT deduction change is that in certain states and localities people have chosen to live with high taxes in order to build and pay for the system they desire. This deduction has been the way it has since the inception of the Federal Income Tax in 1913. These states and localities tend to be more urban, liberal, and vote democratic, which makes them prime for targeting by the current Congress and administration. It’s an easy way to collect more revenue for the federal government to help plug a deficit hole (although they still fail in doing so by $1.5 trillion) that benefits corporations and the extremely wealthy more than anyone else. Additionally, this removes power from the states by absorbing more taxable resources from the states and transfers it to the federal government.

For a party that use to be all about states rights and shrinking the federal government it is all very calculated. They are simultaneously shrinking the work and oversight done by the federal government, with plans to do “welfare reform”, while at the same time making a huge money grab from the states to pay for their own raiding of the federal coffers. If it wasn’t reality, it would make for a great book.
It still however means that anyone, regardless of what state or city they live in, who is still itemizing deductions for 2018 after the increased standard deductions & various credits in the new bill, that person is wealthy compared to most of the country & can afford to kick in a few extra bucks if they’re living within their means & I doubt will garner much sympathy from the rest of the masses. Most people donthave overly large local or state taxes because they don’t make six figures & most people don’t have large property tax bills because they don’t have expensive homes. I agree that you don’t have to have a million dollar house to be effected as others have suggested but it’s being disingenuous to not admit that this tax deduction cap on state/local/property taxes will effect anyone but the wealthier 25% of the country.

As to whether the prepayments here will count, that depends on the IRS interpretation. Unlike Philadelphia who sends out tax bills for the following year in December, Pittsburgh doesn’t do so until later in the year, but the receipts they are giving for this weeks payments say 2018 on them & make no mention of an estimated payment. It’s all still an unknown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2017, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Manchester
3,110 posts, read 2,923,116 times
Reputation: 3728
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKyank View Post
It still however means that anyone, regardless of what state or city they live in, who is still itemizing deductions for 2018 after the increased standard deductions & various credits in the new bill, that person is wealthy compared to most of the country & can afford to kick in a few extra bucks if they’re living within their means & I doubt will garner much sympathy from the rest of the masses. Most people donthave overly large local or state taxes because they don’t make six figures & most people don’t have large property tax bills because they don’t have expensive homes. I agree that you don’t have to have a million dollar house to be effected as others have suggested but it’s being disingenuous to not admit that this tax deduction cap on state/local/property taxes will effect anyone but the wealthier 25% of the country.

As to whether the prepayments here will count, that depends on the IRS interpretation. Unlike Philadelphia who sends out tax bills for the following year in December, Pittsburgh doesn’t do so until later in the year, but the receipts they are giving for this weeks payments say 2018 on them & make no mention of an estimated payment. It’s all still an unknown.
My issue is not with having to kick in a few extra bucks but rather why it was done. It wasn’t done to improve anything, it was done as a means of sticking it to a certain segment of the country (determined by geography) to help minimize the benefits to another segment of the country (the richest of the rich). Neither of those segments are the working poor who need the most help and are getting nothing in comparison.

Perhaps since Pgh is using the same tax rate as last year they are able to produce bills on demand for those who want to prepay and thus skirting the issue with bills needing to be sent prior to Jan 1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2017, 11:00 AM
 
5,894 posts, read 6,891,939 times
Reputation: 4107
Quote:
Originally Posted by PghYinzer View Post
Perhaps since Pgh is using the same tax rate as last year they are able to produce bills on demand for those who want to prepay and thus skirting the issue with bills needing to be sent prior to Jan 1.
Agree, technically since there is no rate change or reassessment going on it shouldn’t matter but I do know that the city has to officially certify the property tax annually & that won’t take place until 2018 so not sure if that puts a wrench into things. The IRS did nothing to clarify things with their last release sadly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2017, 11:46 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,557,509 times
Reputation: 6392
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKyank View Post
Agree, technically since there is no rate change or reassessment going on it shouldn’t matter but I do know that the city has to officially certify the property tax annually & that won’t take place until 2018 so not sure if that puts a wrench into things. The IRS did nothing to clarify things with their last release sadly.
The IRS statement was clear. If there is no bill for taxes due in 2018 by Dec 31, you're not eligible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2017, 12:31 PM
 
5,894 posts, read 6,891,939 times
Reputation: 4107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
The IRS statement was clear. If there is no bill for taxes due in 2018 by Dec 31, you're not eligible.
They say for taxes due “the real property taxes are assessed prior to 2018....State or local law determines whether and when a property is assessed”

So no, it’s not clear as the city code is not clear on what ‘assessed’ (for date purposes) is in any year where there is not a new assessment occurring. Is a prepayment an estimated payment when the amount due is already known?

It also needs to be understood that an IRS Advisory statement has no legal authority anyways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top