Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2010, 05:56 AM
 
78 posts, read 137,032 times
Reputation: 34

Advertisements

A rail line between the two hubs of the region. Almost two separate downtown areas within one city. Downtown Pittsburgh with more than 240,000 daily people in transit and Oakland with better than 90,000 daily workers in transit. Add the thousands of students in daily movement and these numbers swell even more.

The Downtown-Oakland line certainly showing far more potential in terms of daily passenger load than the North shore Connector. A political prize given to the gambling hall, Continental Development and to a lesser degree the Steelers and Pirates. A rail line that could have had federal support had it been given the correct backing by our local political heads rather than some pipe dream line connecting far to few people - the North Shore line. Well better late than never! Finally the outgoing county ex, Dan Onorato is supporting a way to get the long over due line developed. And while in my humble mind, local leaders failed to get such a line built in the first place and supported a line to no where ( North Shore Connector ) Now we have a real opportunity to get a beneficial and much needed direct rail line in between the two largest business hub's.

Home - Pittsburgh-to-Oakland Connector & Oakland Circulator is the web site promoting the opportunity of private and public partnership to get the project going. Development rights along parts of the rail line will be a large prize for the private folks wishing to invest. There are countless examples of strong development having taken place over, under and alongside transit stations in many us cities.

Pittsburgh is a natural for such a system. The geographical short distance between the two hubs allows for a quick ride and from there spokes can be developed to such areas as East Liberty, Shady Side and the South Side.

Keep your eye on some of the private European transit firms. Such international firms have been looking for development opportunity in the United States. Pittsburgh could be a prize. Downtown and Oakland have both been growing in terms of office workers and residential folk along with development despite a long long standing loss of overall city population. The time for connecting the two with transit rail is LONG OVERDUE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2010, 06:31 AM
 
106 posts, read 212,039 times
Reputation: 31
Oakland might be better served by a kind of bus tunnel; it could be a sort of underground busway beneath Oakland. A friend of mine was working on this idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 06:41 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh area
9,912 posts, read 24,655,128 times
Reputation: 5163
Here's the story from the front of the PG today: Oakland transit line explored

Interesting idea, but I'm not holding my breath.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 07:32 AM
 
Location: Hempfield Twp
780 posts, read 1,384,729 times
Reputation: 210
Why not support the hometown manufacturer of such systems? hint, hint....out by the Allegheny County airport.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 07:58 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,014,869 times
Reputation: 2911
I'd love to get my hands on the documents behind the registration wall. But in any event, I was just reading about how streetcars and such were originally economical for developers because they also got ancillary land right grants which became more valuable as a result of the streetcars they built. Which leads me to this bit from the website:

Quote:
The RAAC through the Transportation Action Partnership has been evaluating the feasibility of delivering these projects through a Public Private Partnership (P3) arrangement. Under the P3 premise, the corridors have two primary components: delivery of transportation system improvements and conveyance of development rights to certain parcels along the corridors for ancillary real estate development.
So that sounds potentially feasible--I think there are potentially billions of dollars of real estate potential that could be unlocked by these projects, so it does seem like you should be able to tie that together and at least attract some private capital.

I also think if put together correctly, these projects could get substantial federal funding as well. So I'm glad to see this being moved along, hopefully in part in preparation for such grant requests.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 08:07 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,014,869 times
Reputation: 2911
So on this from the PG article:

Quote:
The plan offers three possible corridors for a Downtown-Oakland link, which could be light-rail, an elevated people mover or rapid bus, which imitates a subway with its limited stops, dedicated lanes and stations. The corridors are along Centre Avenue, Second Avenue and Colwell Street/Fifth Avenue. The Colwell Street/Fifth Avenue corridor appears to offer the best development potential and is the most direct route, [Dennis Davin, county economic development director] said. . . .

The Colwell Street corridor, three miles long, begins near the new Downtown arena and ends in the heart of Oakland. The Centre Avenue corridor is longer and could require tunneling, making it more expensive, while the Second Avenue corridor is not as ripe for development, Mr. Davin said.
Colwell would be acceptable and does seem likely to offer the most bang for the buck. Centre, however, would be more transformative, and I'd at least like to see some sort of rapid transit up the Hill along Centre eventually, even if it doesn't connect through to Oakland.

But please, not Second Avenue. That's not where we need rapid transit and in my view would be the equivalent of opting for the North Shore Connector again (probably good for some big players, but a poor allocation of resources overall).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 08:32 AM
 
809 posts, read 2,409,882 times
Reputation: 330
It should really connect up with the T
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 08:36 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,014,869 times
Reputation: 2911
Here is a link with some maps and discussion:

Pittsburgh Hopes for Privately Funded Transit Connection to Oakland « The Transport Politic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 08:38 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,014,869 times
Reputation: 2911
Quote:
Originally Posted by gameguy56 View Post
It should really connect up with the T
That would certainly be ideal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2010, 09:51 AM
 
78 posts, read 137,032 times
Reputation: 34
Default Examples of 'TOD's -- Transit Oriented Developments in the US

The attractive element of 'development rights associated with transit rail' (TOD's) is nicely showcased by this web site that offers proof of such.

Transit oriented developments in the US (http://www.newurbannews.com/newurbancommunities/tods.html - broken link)

And the Metropolitan Council representing the Twin Cities region has done a great job in it's push for urban transit development. A truly progressive region with of course high praised city-multi county merging. Something Pittsburgh naturally runs from.

http://www.metrocouncil.org/planning...index_page.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top