Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Restraint was in order since she charged the vehicle under a disguise.
There was no intent to my believing to harm her.
The judge or jury will decide this.
I might be wrong but something tells me this case might not even get that far. Something fishy about the delay. What are they looking at to have the delay? Anyone know?
Yes, what I bolded is what the judge or jury will decide.
From what I've seen and read, I think that restraint might have been in order. But it also seems that unecessary violence may have been a factor as well. And that is what the guy is being charged with, so they need to determine if that were indeed the case.
4th degree assault is a misdemeanor; it's something that DA's don't typically back down from or plea out. The DA's job isn't to be fair, his/her job is to get convictions.
Google can't find it, not for you or me either...I can only assume that it must be something you heard from Glenn Beck or others of his ilk. Considering your foot slipped statement, I have to conclude that her convictions for "domestic terrorism" are lies.
The flaw in your argument is that cant discuss revoking something that doesnt exist in the first place..
What in the world are you talking about? What does any of that have to do with the rights granted and protected by the 1st Amendment. I think you are more than just a little confused.
Restraint was in order since she charged the vehicle under a disguise.
There was no intent to my believing to harm her.
The judge or jury will decide this.
I might be wrong but something tells me this case might not even get that far. Something fishy about the delay. What are they looking at to have the delay? Anyone know?
The case is delayed because the DA is considering additional charges against Profitt.
I'm seeing a lot of people defending this woman with regard to her eco-terror background with statements like, "she's innocent until proven guilty," and "she was only charged and hasn't been convicted [yet]".
Yet those very same people have already reached the conclusion that the accused in the case at hand is guilty.
I don't think I've ever seen a more obvious and transparent demonstration of hypocrisy in my several years here. What an amazing thread this is.
I'm seeing a lot of people defending this woman with regard to her eco-terror background with statements like, "she's innocent until proven guilty," and "she was only charged and hasn't been convicted [yet]".
Yet those very same people have already reached the conclusion that the accused in the case at hand is guilty.
I don't think I've ever seen a more obvious and transparent demonstration of hypocrisy in my several years here. What an amazing thread this is.
Carry on...
I was saying this pages back.
On one hand he is already guilty and on the other they defend her criminal background.
Amazing.
Typical left winger hypocrisy to protect a known terrorist but believe someone else who "might have" committed a 4th degree misdemeanor is a hard core criminal.
Tim Profitt, the Rand Paul tea party associate that made headlines stomping the head of a pinned down young girl has his day in court, Pleads not guilty
I'm seeing a lot of people defending this woman with regard to her eco-terror background with statements like, "she's innocent until proven guilty," and "she was only charged and hasn't been convicted [yet]".
Yet those very same people have already reached the conclusion that the accused in the case at hand is guilty.
I don't think I've ever seen a more obvious and transparent demonstration of hypocrisy in my several years here. What an amazing thread this is.
Carry on...
I think the video makes it obvious that the man is guilty.
I'm not defending her, merely stating that according to the law, her background cannot be deemed by a judge or a jury as due cause for Proffit having a free pass if he indeed did use uneccessary force in attempting to restrain her.
Either way it goes she has been exposed as a PAID Soros left winger anti American trouble maker.
Guess we need to keep any eye on these types of people who have domestic terrorist charges on their record.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
