Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
partisan BS aside if it happened to you, would you want charges pressed? What if it happened to one of your loved ones?
"looney toons" did shove a sign in the car, intentional or not, maybe she should have to face charges as well, however she was no threat to Rand Paul, unless you consider a possible paper cut a threat.
Putting a boot on her shoulder and then it slipping (or whatever excuse of Rush Limbaugh's that you want to repeat) could have caused her serious irreperable bodily harm if not death.
I see shoe on shoulder then the heel coming down on head. So whats your conservative sheeple line? Not too mention 2 guys trying to wrestle her down to the ground while she's trying to get away. What do you want to call that??
There is a big difference between Tea baggers grabbing a woman and throwing her to the ground stomping her head and the Secret Service protecting the POTUS. There was a police officer or two around at the time and it did not seem they were concerned with Rand being attacked by a sign.
Whether he stomped her head or her shoulder, he is plainly a coward & anyone who agrees that what he did is justified, is an idiot.
No one should agree with any kind of physical violence in the streets like this.
Who are the vigilantes in this story? Is it the three or four men who took the law into their own hands and grabbed her, throw her to the ground and stomped on her head? All the while none of them are licensed security or police. Or was it the girl/woman who wanted to get a picture taken with Rand for a film/project she was working on? HHMM touch choice
<snip>I see shoe on shoulder then the heel coming down on head. So whats your conservative sheeple line? Not too mention 2 guys trying to wrestle her down to the ground while she's trying to get away. What do you want to call that??
Any seeing human being knows that, it's only the RWNJ fools who won't acknowledge it.
Btw the heel came down on her head with FORCE behind it.
Her history is vital in this case and the Judge should be looking at it.
Her record has a domestic terrorist charge on it and if he is found guilty the worse would be a 4th degree assault charge.
Who is kidding who here.
Left wing anti American nuts of course trying to protect one of their own who is a known criminal.
Go ahead lefties protect the trouble makers on your side.
No wonder liberalism is dying in America. Always on the wrong side of right.
Her history has nothing to do with this case unless the defense can provide some rationale as to why its relevant and the judge accepts that rationale under prior law and legal precedent.
In terms of this incident this woman did not physically accost this man or do anything provocative to him that would cause him to defend himself. She had no weapon. He clearly was the aggressor in this incident.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
