Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-07-2011, 09:52 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,939,504 times
Reputation: 12828

Advertisements

Whew! For a minute there I was afraid that Gibbs might make an additional $28K that would automatically toss him into the "RICH" column under Obama's definition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-07-2011, 09:54 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by stayinformed40 View Post
I really do not understand what you are trying to say? Are you in PR? Work for a Fortune Co? Again, not sure what your point is.

MY point is, I find it hypocritical that the left deems $172,000 + major perks modest when it applies to one of their own. That is my point.

I am all for people making and keeping their money and hope that what they make is a lot. I am against someone from the left deeming any salary level too much and wanting to take money from people they feel have too much. I am against the left applying these rules to everyone but themselves.
IF you had a point you'd be pointing out where Dems said $172,000 wasn't modest for a Rep in a similar position. THAT would would be hypocritical. Right now your point seems nothing but whiney feigned outrage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 10:06 AM
 
46,963 posts, read 25,998,208 times
Reputation: 29454
Quote:
Originally Posted by stayinformed40 View Post
I guess you've found a discourse level to your liking...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,285,820 times
Reputation: 3826
The calculation is simple: If you support or work for Obama, you are permitted to make between 50-70K more before you leave the realm of "modestly paid". My guess is that Gibbs would have to make more than 300K before he was unfairly paid. If you work for the fedgov, it would take over 150K to be unfairly paid, whereas the private sector would be seen as lavishly compensated when you make over 90K. It's very elementary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 10:18 AM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,617,921 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by stayinformed40 View Post
With all the 'spread the wealth' and 'people should not have/make so much money' talk constantly being spewed from the left - it is amazing to me that Obama would call a $172,000/year salary "modest"!!!

In his intereview with the New York Times regarding Gibbs leaving, he says about Gibbs, "He's had a six year stretch now where where basically he's been going 24/7 with relatively modest pay."

Typical hypocrisy coming from the left yet again.


Gibbs to Leave as White House Press Secretary - NYTimes.com
It's not like he was an "uber-rich" guy making 250k plus.

Honestly though...for a job like White House spokesman..I don't consider $175k to be too much. He's in the spotlight daily. I don't like this administration, but I won't take a jab at that salary. How does that compare to previous people that held the job?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 10:20 AM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,132,449 times
Reputation: 3241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
It's not like he was an "uber-rich" guy making 250k plus.

Honestly though...for a job like White House spokesman..I don't consider $175k to be too much. He's in the spotlight daily. I don't like this administration, but I won't take a jab at that salary. How does that compare to previous people that held the job?
For once I agree with you.

Anyone with that job probably ought to get paid twice that, especially living in DC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,285,820 times
Reputation: 3826
The pay is not without benefits. Being in the spotlight and being able to network makes this job a good stepping stone to some lucrative lobbying job. Don't weep for this moron. He belongs with the other overpaid lobbyist morons on K Street.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 10:43 AM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,310,171 times
Reputation: 4894
Just another "overpaid" Obama lap dog who is horrible at his job and failed.

Come on people, it is ridiculous to think this man made that kind of money to begin with, then add in the fact that it is just another case of poor judgment on Obamas part just like Rahm was.

Another failure and poor decision by Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 10:54 AM
 
46,963 posts, read 25,998,208 times
Reputation: 29454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
It's not like he was an "uber-rich" guy making 250k plus.

Honestly though...for a job like White House spokesman..I don't consider $175k to be too much. He's in the spotlight daily. I don't like this administration, but I won't take a jab at that salary. How does that compare to previous people that held the job?
The nice thing about the Internet is that sometimes you find yourself in agreement with people you otherwise don't have much in common. Principled stance, well worth a rep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2011, 11:15 AM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,617,921 times
Reputation: 1275
In 2005 Scott McClellan made $161k doing the same job. $161k to $172k is not an unreasonable increase in salary.

2005 White House Staff List -- By Salary(washingtonpost.com)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top