Who supports a new 9/11 investigation and why or why not? (laws, New York)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"I saw the plane at eye level ... getting ... bigger, bigger, bigger ... and then I dove under my desk" ...... BOOM ... CRASH ....
Stanley survives ..... nothing else in that building survives ... but Stanley has a 757 park next to his desk and he survives? And this is the Discovery Channel ..... not "twoofer" videos!!!!
So you call "conspiracy theorists" crazy ? Really? You believe that steaming mountain of bovine excrement? hahahahahahahahahahaha
Don't call anyone else crazy .... when people like you buy this type of TRIPE ... you lose your ability to call ANYONE crazy.
Yes REALLY ..... if the plane is fake .... then the parts are planted evidence ... there is no other explanation since I'm sure most people would agree that it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY that composite Computer Graphic Images would have parts that fall off and land in the street.
How can you say there is 0% evidence of 'no-plane'? Have you looked at the MSM videos that have been carefully examined, compared, and found to be faked?
Yep. I'm sure their explanation for this is going to be that the government spiked the local NYC water supply and thus everyone in the city was simply hallucinating but didn't actually see any of what "happened" on 9/11.
And what is scary is that some people would actually believe such a conspiracy, especially a certain poster in this thread.
Another example of the Truther inability to reason beyond their confirmation bias.
It is actually easier for two different people responding to a blog at the same to appear "amazingly fast" than it is for one person with a sock puppet.
Ah... but never mind. That makes sense and is therefore beyond your capacity to consider.
Don't you realize... what you saw were "imaginary" airplanes. They were not really there.
It is just as reasonable to assert that the Twin Towers never existed either.
So, let's point out the genuine phenomenon we have witnessed as at least two Truthers on this thread have arguably crossed the line from deluded to insane.
It is ultimately an acknowledgment by them that all their previous arguments have failed. It is the formal recognition that all the compelling evidence proves them wrong.
How does one deal with that circumstance... i.e. where all of the evidence is against you?
By crossing the line into complete unreason and declaring all the evidence fake.
I'm content with that. It puts the capstone on this thread as a comprehensive demonstration of the idiocy of the Truther movement.
It is just as reasonable to assert that the Twin Towers never existed either.
So, let's point out the genuine phenomenon we have witnessed as at least two Truthers on this thread have arguably crossed the line from deluded to insane.
It is ultimately an acknowledgment by them that all their previous arguments have failed. It is the formal recognition that all the compelling evidence proves them wrong.
Yes, the fact that thousands of people saw airplanes crash into the Twin Towers invalidates the "no plane" theory. Not to mention the fact that all the passengers on the planes are not among the living.
Quote:
How does one deal with that circumstance... i.e. where all of the evidence is against you?
By crossing the line into complete unreason and declaring all the evidence fake.
Many people do not live in the real world! They are in their own little world.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.