Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-26-2011, 07:37 PM
 
3,083 posts, read 4,013,975 times
Reputation: 2358

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by descentofman View Post
I am impressed [sarcasm] with your mental argument rebuttal. I will have to try it your way instead of looking up statistics, Oh ya is not. LOL
You post nonsensical drivel like this and have the gall to call out someone else on their post;
Quote:
Originally Posted by descentofman View Post
Their coming to take my gun and my bible, god wants me to have a gun so I can defend the bible because the god that created the universe needs a limp dick bubba to win the day for the bible and to show that there was a flood and that dinosaurs walked with man and the earth is only 4000 years old. God need a bubba with a 357 and his donation so the preacher can not have to work for a living. Talk about living off of others.
Get real.

Quote:
Originally Posted by descentofman View Post
The right to have and bare arms is not absolute. You do not have a right to a Machine gun [ they are very tightly regulated] You do not have a right to C4 and you do not have a right to a 30mm AA gun or a nuke. So the government can regulate guns and ammo.
More pointless and inaccurate hyperbole. Get your facts straight. While you're at it take a minute to look up the meanings of bare and bear. Save yourself some future embarrassment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-26-2011, 07:43 PM
 
3,083 posts, read 4,013,975 times
Reputation: 2358
[quote=jobee;17594253]
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
You will own them with libraries, but they are so dangerous and miss used
the state/people have a right to know the guns rifleing fingerprint etc and the owners oral DNA will be taken plus modern photographs.

You dont need them around the home all the time do you.
Surely your home has adequate safeguards for your family, like internal and external video et cetera.
Whether we need them or not is not the issue. We have a right to own them. That right has absolutely zero effect on you in the UK. Our rights and how we choose to exercise them are not your concern.

If you feel living under the thumb of a bunch of bliss ninnies that believe government restriction of all things potentially harmful is a good thing more power to you. Stay in the UK. That is not a belief that is commonly held here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2011, 07:43 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,372,654 times
Reputation: 11539
Quote:
Originally Posted by jobee View Post
I dont know about illegal, we dont want them.

Why dont you get a modern stunner, at least you'll never be on a murder rap and still get your man.
Becuae we could never catch a deer or, other game to use it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2011, 07:47 PM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,961,338 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by descentofman View Post
The right to have and bare arms is not absolute. You do not have a right to a Machine gun [ they are very tightly regulated] You do not have a right to C4 and you do not have a right to a 30mm AA gun or a nuke. So the government can regulate guns and ammo.
You have the right to a machine gun if it's registered and you are approved by the BATF
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2011, 07:55 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,359 posts, read 26,520,591 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
You have the right to a machine gun if it's registered and you are approved by the BATF
Artillery too. Explosive weapons as well (grenades, etc.).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2011, 08:00 PM
 
Location: leicester-england
102 posts, read 100,542 times
Reputation: 15
Default Constitution- bah!

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
you mean a place where guns are stored? that would actually be unconstitutional. what part of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" do you NOT understand?
I think as 2 thirds of Americans dont own guns, they dont give a damn about those parts of the second Amendment refering to gun ownership.
American governments dont stick to the amendments on other matters.

Those Amendment are like the bible some bits are relevent, and lots are just not suited to modern America.

Modern stun guns will take over, my city leicester[the city that gave the world DNA fingerprinting and solved the worlds first murder using DNA] is working on them now.

[[SIZE=4][SIZE=4]edit[/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=4]] Genetic fingerprinting
[/SIZE]Jeffreys had a "eureka moment" in his lab in Leicester after looking at the X-ray film image of a DNA experiment at 9:05 am on Monday 10 September 1984, which unexpectedly showed both similarities and differences between the DNA of different members of his technician's family.[1]HYPERLINK \l "cite_note-welcome_2004-6"[7] Within about half an hour, he realized the possible scope of DNA fingerprinting, which uses variations in the genetic code to identify individuals. The method has become important in forensic science to assist police detective work, and it has also proved useful in resolving paternity and immigration disputes.[1] The method can also be applied to non-human species, for example in wildlife population genetics studies. Before his methods were commercialised in 1987 his laboratory was the only centre carrying out DNA fingerprinting in the world,#
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alec_Je...fingerprinting

Last edited by jobee; 01-26-2011 at 08:11 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2011, 08:08 PM
 
3,083 posts, read 4,013,975 times
Reputation: 2358
Quote:
Originally Posted by jobee View Post
I think as 2 thirds of Americans dont own guns, they dont give a damn about those parts of the second Amendment refering to gun ownership.
American governments dont stick to the amendments on other matters.

Those Amendment are like the bible some bits are relevent, and lots are just not suited to modern America.

Modern stun guns will take over, my city leicester[the city that gave the world DNA fingerprinting and solved the worlds first murder using DNA] is working on them now.
Again, and as you've chosen to ignore several times now...your claim that 2/3 of Americans don't own firearms is complete and total BS. Post some actual believable statistics to back up your assertion.

Who are you to decide any portions of the Bible or for that matter any other aspect of faith are irrelevant?

It's a great thing that you're proud of your city. Stay there and don't try to impose your values on the rest of us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2011, 08:17 PM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,961,338 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by jobee View Post
I think as 2 thirds of Americans dont own guns, they dont give a damn about those parts of the second Amendment refering to gun ownership.
American governments dont stick to the amendments on other matters.

Those Amendment are like the bible some bits are relevent, and lots are just not suited to modern America.

Modern stun guns will take over, my city leicester[the city that gave the world DNA fingerprinting and solved the worlds first murder using DNA] is working on them now.

[[SIZE=4][SIZE=4]edit[/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=4]] Genetic fingerprinting
[/SIZE]Jeffreys had a "eureka moment" in his lab in Leicester after looking at the X-ray film image of a DNA experiment at 9:05 am on Monday 10 September 1984, which unexpectedly showed both similarities and differences between the DNA of different members of his technician's family.[1]HYPERLINK \l "cite_note-welcome_2004-6"[7] Within about half an hour, he realized the possible scope of DNA fingerprinting, which uses variations in the genetic code to identify individuals. The method has become important in forensic science to assist police detective work, and it has also proved useful in resolving paternity and immigration disputes.[1] The method can also be applied to non-human species, for example in wildlife population genetics studies. Before his methods were commercialised in 1987 his laboratory was the only centre carrying out DNA fingerprinting in the world,#
Alec Jeffreys - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good on Leicester. Don't see how it's relevant. You are free to stay in the UK. No one is forcing you to come here
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2011, 08:21 PM
 
Location: leicester-england
102 posts, read 100,542 times
Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by outbacknv View Post
Again, and as you've chosen to ignore several times now...your claim that 2/3 of Americans don't own firearms is complete and total BS. Post some actual believable statistics to back up your assertion.

Who are you to decide any portions of the Bible or for that matter any other aspect of faith are irrelevant?

It's a great thing that you're proud of your city. Stay there and don't try to impose your values on the rest of us.
Im not telling lies about DNA, If you dont want to discuss the opening post what are you doing on here. IFyou dont mind I will visit my relations when I like.

I am a qualified teacher of humanties, qualfied to give my opinion of the bible.

[[SIZE=4][SIZE=4]edit[/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=4]] Genetic fingerprinting
[/SIZE]Jeffreys had a "eureka moment" in his lab in Leicester after looking at the X-ray film image of a DNA experiment at 9:05 am on Monday 10 September 1984, which unexpectedly showed both similarities and differences between the DNA of different members of his technician's family.[1]HYPERLINK \l "cite_note-welcome_2004-6"[7] Within about half an hour, he realized the possible scope of DNA fingerprinting, which uses variations in the genetic code to identify individuals. The method has become important in forensic science to assist police detective work, and it has also proved useful in resolving paternity and immigration disputes.[1] The method can also be applied to non-human species, for example in wildlife population genetics studies. Before his methods were commercialised in 1987 his laboratory was the only centre carrying out DNA fingerprinting in the world,#
Alec Jeffreys - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2011, 08:27 PM
 
3,083 posts, read 4,013,975 times
Reputation: 2358
Quote:
Originally Posted by jobee View Post
Im not telling lies about DNA, If you dont want to discuss the opening post what are you doing on here. IFyou dont mind I will visit my relations when I like.

I am a qualified teacher of humanties, qualfied to give my opinion of the bible.

[[SIZE=4][SIZE=4]edit[/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=4]] Genetic fingerprinting
[/SIZE]Jeffreys had a "eureka moment" in his lab in Leicester after looking at the X-ray film image of a DNA experiment at 9:05 am on Monday 10 September 1984, which unexpectedly showed both similarities and differences between the DNA of different members of his technician's family.[1]HYPERLINK \l "cite_note-welcome_2004-6"[7] Within about half an hour, he realized the possible scope of DNA fingerprinting, which uses variations in the genetic code to identify individuals. The method has become important in forensic science to assist police detective work, and it has also proved useful in resolving paternity and immigration disputes.[1] The method can also be applied to non-human species, for example in wildlife population genetics studies. Before his methods were commercialised in 1987 his laboratory was the only centre carrying out DNA fingerprinting in the world,#
Alec Jeffreys - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reading comprehension is your friend. At no point did I comment on DNA. In point of fact I'm at a loss as to how you can claim DNA findings are at all germane to the discussion of our Constitutional rights.

As far as visiting your family goes I'm not claiming a right to say you shouldn't. I'm simply saying you have no more right to demand we change our rights and beliefs to accommodate your wishes than I do to demand you British stop drinking your foul tasting warm beer.

You're a temporary guest in this country when you visit your relatives. Your opinions regarding our laws are worth less than the hot air required to express them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top