Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-02-2011, 11:14 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,674,422 times
Reputation: 7943

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Ever think that the supreme court isn't as objective as it should be?.
Absolutely agree. It's comical to see some of these people act as if the U.S. Supreme Court is the authority on fair and unbiased opinions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-02-2011, 11:27 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Absolutely agree. It's comical to see some of these people act as if the U.S. Supreme Court is the authority on fair and unbiased opinions.
I think you just leaned a bit further left. According to the document that established our government the Supreme Court is the last ruling authority. Now if Obama should happen to get to appoint another judge I bet you won't be talking like that about their bias. You do understand what I mean, I hope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2011, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
3,644 posts, read 6,306,186 times
Reputation: 1633
Why are these guys still getting paid? If anyone in the private sector got it wrong as much as they do they'd be fired. Why are we wasting taxpayer money on them? All it does is generate money for the lawyers who try cases before them and create another step in the process of any appeals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2011, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,752,619 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Ever think that the supreme court isn't as objective as it should be?
Ruling that businesses are "people" with rights?


Of all 5 of them?
Looking at some analysis other than Faux might be a wise choice.
All were unanimous. But someone who can't spell fox can't be expected to know that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2011, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,481,395 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
All were unanimous. But someone who can't spell fox can't be expected to know that
I assume--at least hope--you actually know "faux" means "false" and were trying overly hard to be funny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2011, 03:16 PM
 
59,053 posts, read 27,318,346 times
Reputation: 14285
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Absolutely agree. It's comical to see some of these people act as if the U.S. Supreme Court is the authority on fair and unbiased opinions.
Kinda like Roe vs Wade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2011, 03:30 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,101,264 times
Reputation: 4828
Oh please. 5 straight overturns is hardly unprecedented. Here are Supreme Court statistics of cases heard in the 2009 calendar broken down by Circuit Court:

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content...-070710-10.pdf

The most conservative circuit appeals court - the 4th - had 4 of 5 reviewed cases reversed. Another conservative circuit - the 6th - had 7 of 7 cases reversed - that's right, 7 in a row. The 9th had 9 of 15 reversed (one of the better track records).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2011, 03:35 PM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,101,264 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerbacon View Post
Why are these guys still getting paid? If anyone in the private sector got it wrong as much as they do they'd be fired. Why are we wasting taxpayer money on them? All it does is generate money for the lawyers who try cases before them and create another step in the process of any appeals.
In 2009 the 9th Circuit Court of appeals ruled on something like 13,000 cases. Of those 13,000 cases, 9 were overturned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2011, 07:52 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,752,619 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
I assume--at least hope--you actually know "faux" means "false" and were trying overly hard to be funny.

There isn't anything called "faux" news. I assumed some challenged person trying to be funny and change the name of Fox news. Seems I was right.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2011, 07:54 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,752,619 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Oh please. 5 straight overturns is hardly unprecedented. Here are Supreme Court statistics of cases heard in the 2009 calendar broken down by Circuit Court:

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content...-070710-10.pdf

The most conservative circuit appeals court - the 4th - had 4 of 5 reviewed cases reversed. Another conservative circuit - the 6th - had 7 of 7 cases reversed - that's right, 7 in a row. The 9th had 9 of 15 reversed (one of the better track records).

LOL, how many were unanimous? This was a clear slap at the 9th circus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top