Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-15-2011, 05:36 AM
 
45,235 posts, read 26,464,208 times
Reputation: 24995

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
Typical Conservative "I've got mine and ******* everybody else".
More like liberalism.

I spent all mine, now gimme yours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2011, 05:37 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,760,703 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
Typical Conservative "I've got mine and ******* everybody else".

Please let me know how I can get my mortgage payments to you. What? You don't want to pay my mortgage? Typical, Lefty..............
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2011, 05:40 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,305,856 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoobleKar View Post
GM Still Owes Us - Forbes.com

The company got $50 billion from our government, and $10 billion more from Canada. They have paid the U.S. back $7 billion plus interest, as I understand it, including the latest payment of nearly $5 billion. So they say they paid us back.

Not quite: That still leaves $43 billion.
The $43 billion is NOT a loan it's in equity i.e. stock. Considering the value the government paid for the stock and GM's current growth prospects the U.S Government will probably walk away with a profit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2011, 05:41 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,760,703 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzyTallGuy View Post
The $43 billion is NOT a loan it's in equity i.e. stock. Considering the value the government paid for the stock and GM's current growth prospects the U.S Government will probably walk away with a profit.

It is money from the US treasury, that has not been repaid. You have no basis for thinking we will walk away with a profit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2011, 05:46 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,305,856 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Quick question...my GM shares I bought back in 2004. They're worth 36 a share according to the ticker, right? Sweet!

I'm going to sell them right after I sell my GM bonds.

I'll let you know how it goes.
You took a risk and you lost. Personally I have to ask what were you doing buying GM bonds or stock in 2004? The company was hemorrhaging cash and even back then. The health care cost and increasing debt were concerns in the financial community.

But I guess it’s easier to get pissed off at the government than to say you made a bad investment decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2011, 05:48 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,305,856 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
It is EASY to make a profit when you can shift your legacy pension obligations to the US taxpayers and stiff your creditors under the guise of "New GM".
Would you like a hankie?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2011, 05:56 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,305,856 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
I don't understand. How can you cancel shares and still be in business? Must be some sort of new accounting rules. I'm sure they'll give me my money back. I have legitimate shared from almost 10 years ago. I'll be fine.
It happens all the time when companies go into bankruptcy. Those are not new accounting rules they are rather old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2011, 05:57 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,305,856 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by bc42gb43 View Post
In bankruptcy, equity is on the lowest rung of the ladder for absolute priority. Equity holders cannot be paid anything until secured and unsecured creditors get repaid on their debts in full. What that means is that a lot of the time in corporate bankruptcy the bondholders get wiped out.
Finance 101
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2011, 06:03 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,305,856 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
What you say here is very true but does GM have any shareholders who aren't the government? If they do and they are paying them any kind of money for their share ownership surely they would have to pay the government the same amounts BEFORE they distribute bonuses to the UAW workers. I don't want any stock anywhere that doesn't share its profits with its stockholders. I am very glad that my share of Government Motors is only my tax money they used to save the UAW buddies of Obama.
That is entirely the prerogative of the board of directors as how dividends and employee bonuses are awarded. If GM shareholders want a dividend it is incumbent upon them to bring that issue up with the board of directors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2011, 06:13 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,305,856 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonythetuna View Post
Don't forget this tidbit:

"The company needed a $49.5 billion government bailout to survive a mid-2009 bankruptcy filing, and the government still owns 25 percent of GM's stock. Chrysler, which needed a $12.5 billion bailout, plans to pay bonuses as well. The government owns about 9 percent of Chrysler stock."
The stake in either company does not represent a controlling interest. Therefore the board of directors is free to make decisions in regard to worker bonuses. If the stocholders are REALLY outraged about this they need to organize a significant number of shareholders and bring this issue to the board.

It's actuallhy healthy in the long run to give workers bonuses. It gives workers the incentive to be productive. Too bad more companies don't give worker bonuses, espeicially in light of stock options and other executive compensation that goes on in many corporations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top