Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,125,625 times
Reputation: 3954

Advertisements

I've reread the article.

I still assert he said essentially nothing about anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:19 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,745,699 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB View Post
Who was the last conservative black person that liberals respected?
Or the comment was so off you please give me the list of conservative black people liberals respect and don't just put down as easily as they breath air.

Is what it is IMO.
My feelings about Thomas have nothing to do with his skin color. He's a dolt, regardless of his race.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:21 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,745,699 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarlet_ohara View Post
You see, when conservatives criticize and oppose Obama, it's claimed to be because of his skin color.
According to who? Not me. I've never said that.

Quote:
Do you remember that bit of liberal logic now?

I hope so, because as you say, it has no credibility. May I expect to see you pointing this out every time you see it used from now on?
You're assuming that you know what every liberal is thinking, and you assume that my thoughts are just like theirs. Maybe if you stopped stereotyping and being so narrow-minded about others, you wouldn't be so quick to judge. Not everyone is the same. Until you understand that, you're going to have trouble getting along with people who think differently than you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:28 PM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,158,634 times
Reputation: 3242
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarlet_ohara View Post
Yeah, judges ask questions all the time, but they are not required to as you are suggesting.
I suggested no such thing. I did state that it is rather typical and certainly within the scope of their duties. IOW, they do it all the time. I tend to get worried when I have a judge that DOESN'T ask questions...the norm is very much that they DO.

Quote:
They ask questions when there are holes and illogic in the arguments. And then some of them do it to showboat, as if they have something to prove to their audience.
Not necessarily. Remember you have more than one judge on an appellate panel. Often they ask questions they know the answers to (or softball questions) because they are trying to sway the other members of the court.

And sometimes they ask them just for fun.

Quote:
You want to see a little song and dance, entertainment from Thomas even though it will most likely be redundant!
If Thomas asks a question, you're probably right that it is redundant.

Quote:
So SC justices are supposed to do exactly as an appellate judge that you personally witnessed. Each should behave in exactly the same manner to satisfy you.
SCOTUS judges ARE appellate judges. Except in those very rare cases over which they have original jurisdiction...

I expect them to act like appellate judges, or any judge for that matter, who ASK QUESTIONS.

Quote:
Gee, I wonder how Kagan, who has never been a judge, is going to handle that. Are you going to school her on proper judge procedure per your instructions?
I don't know and don't care. This thread isn't about Kagan and I haven't seen enough of her yet to know - neither do you. This is simply diversion.

Quote:
You are making assertions and forming conclusions based solely on your personal opinion.
No, I'm making assertions based on professional experience. Ask any appellate lawyer or judge.

Quote:
You can't even bring a logical argument to this thread so I think the probability is high that if a judge drilled you, your argument was either insufficient, illogical and/or had holes in it.
Wow.

Just wow.

Aren't you the one that played the race card? I'm sorry, but you just described your own posts...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:29 PM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,158,634 times
Reputation: 3242
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarlet_ohara View Post
It's liberal logic.
There is only one kind of logic, and it doesn't belong to any political persuasion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:36 PM
 
56,966 posts, read 35,329,937 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarlet_ohara View Post
Liberals hate a black man with a mind of his own.
So any black man who isn't conservative doesn't think for himself? It just cracks me up how hostile you guys are towards blacks...!

And you wonder why most blacks don't vote Republican! Why would i join a party where people think like this^^^?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:46 PM
 
3,681 posts, read 6,290,529 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
I've reread the article.

I still assert he said essentially nothing about anything.
Perhaps because you were listening for a political message and there was none; just the thoughtful, introspective words of a "thinker," advising young people of the importance of learning about their country and its history and standing up for the freedom our country stands for - something that isn't taught much in our public schools today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:47 PM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,158,634 times
Reputation: 3242
Quote:
Originally Posted by maja View Post
Perhaps because you were listening for a political message and there was none; just the thoughtful, introspective words of a "thinker," advising young people of the importance of learning about their country and its history and standing up for the freedom our country stands for - something that isn't taught much in our public schools today.
In other words, he said a lot of fluff without substance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:48 PM
 
3,128 posts, read 6,556,242 times
Reputation: 1599
Race Card, collect them all!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:49 PM
 
3,681 posts, read 6,290,529 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strel View Post
In other words, he said a lot of fluff without substance.
If that is what you consider intellectual discourse. You see its different than political activism. Some people actually - think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top