Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-27-2011, 11:39 PM
 
3,681 posts, read 6,277,015 times
Reputation: 1516

Advertisements

Wish we had more like him...

‘Defending Liberty’: Defiant Clarence Thomas Slams Critics for ‘Undermining’ High Court | The Blaze

"Delivering the keynote speech at an annual symposium for conservative law students, Thomas spoke in vague, but ominous, terms about the direction of the country and urged his listeners to “redouble your efforts to learn about our country so that you’re in a position to defend it.”

Important words for us all to heed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:05 AM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,681,792 times
Reputation: 7943
I have trouble respecting a justice who hasn't asked a question in over five years. I've also heard that he regularly falls asleep in court.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Celebrates Five Years of Silence During Oral Arguments
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:34 AM
 
1,677 posts, read 1,669,079 times
Reputation: 1024
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
I have trouble respecting a justice who hasn't asked a question in over five years.
Why ask questions when he already has the answers?

By the time an oral argument is heard, he has already read the briefs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:37 AM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,681,792 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarlet_ohara View Post
Why ask questions when he already has the answers?

By the time an oral argument is heard, he has already read the briefs.
Then why does Scalia ask more questions than anyone? Does it mean he has none of the answers, or is it a sign of an intelligent and curious judge?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:48 AM
 
1,677 posts, read 1,669,079 times
Reputation: 1024
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Then why does Scalia ask more questions than anyone? Does it mean he has none of the answers, or is it a sign of an intelligent and curious judge?
I call it showboating, and a waste of time since everything has already been said in writing, and they all have read it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 06:00 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,208,953 times
Reputation: 3411
He and Scalia undermined the neutrality of the high court when they attended an invitation only, closed to all press, strategy planning session organized by the Koch brothers. Supreme Court justices have to be beyond reproach--the entire idea of the court is that it be above the political process. SC justices have spoke about issues before when it was widely covered by the press, or to groups of law students or trade associations in more private settings, but never in a forum like this that's entirely partisan and private, and where it draws suspicion that they could very well have been part of the planning process.

Last edited by mb1547; 02-28-2011 at 06:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 06:13 AM
 
Location: Tallahassee
1,869 posts, read 1,093,892 times
Reputation: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarlet_ohara View Post
I call it showboating, and a waste of time since everything has already been said in writing, and they all have read it.
Really? So you'd just eliminate oral arguments altogether? LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 06:44 AM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,510,277 times
Reputation: 11351
He's not the only justice who's found oral arguments a waste of time. There's nothing said in oral arguments they haven't already read in the briefs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 07:27 AM
 
Location: The middle of nowhere Arkansas
3,325 posts, read 3,171,706 times
Reputation: 1015
I don't have a problem with the guy. I do have a problem with kagan and sotomeyer tho. Imagine that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 07:30 AM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,136,221 times
Reputation: 3241
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
He's not the only justice who's found oral arguments a waste of time. There's nothing said in oral arguments they haven't already read in the briefs.
Judges that think oral arguments are a waste of time do not belong on the court, any court.

SOME oral arguments may be a waste of time, but more often than not it is an opportunity for the judges to ASK QUESTIONS. Briefs are by their nature partisan and don't always cover every angle.

Thomas thinks they are a waste of time because he's too dumb to ask decent questions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top