Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-05-2011, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,477,394 times
Reputation: 6541

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
You mean all these years and you're not aware the president ALWAYS submits a budget?
The President does not always submit a budget. That tradition began with President Wilson. He was the first President to submit a proposed budget to Congress. No other President prior to Wilson did so.

djmilf is quite correct, the House originates all appropriation bills, but the Senate can amend them as any other bill. Also, as florida.bob correctly pointed out, no proposed budget by any President has ever passed the House much less Congress and none ever will, because it is not the President's constitutional responsibility to submit a proposed budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2011, 01:17 PM
 
1,461 posts, read 1,531,048 times
Reputation: 790
And no where does the GOP talk about ending tax handouts for corporations. In fact, on TV the other night, Tea folks who were elected to Congress defended their receiving agricultural subsidies. Only one said he would refuse them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 01:26 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,186,917 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
The President does not always submit a budget. That tradition began with President Wilson. He was the first President to submit a proposed budget to Congress. No other President prior to Wilson did so.
Here we go.. Liberals now supporting the cutting of federal spending.

We can now completely abolish the Office of Management and Budget.. I wonder how much MORE this will save..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
djmilf is quite correct, the House originates all appropriation bills, but the Senate can amend them as any other bill. Also, as florida.bob correctly pointed out, no proposed budget by any President has ever passed the House much less Congress and none ever will, because it is not the President's constitutional responsibility to submit a proposed budget.
My my my, we all have short memories..

The House budget largely tracks Obama's initial proposed spending plan, with the exception of a decision to drop his $250 billion request for potential future bailouts of struggling financial institutions

Senate follows House, passes Obama budget plan - CNN

Congress very often does pass the presidents budget for the most part..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 01:34 PM
 
30,087 posts, read 18,704,527 times
Reputation: 20911
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Still in that delusional world I see? There is the framework of a plan that will require the Politicians to work at a compromise on specifics of that plan. When and if, they ever get out of the politics mode, they will do that. But, that is not going to happen anytime soon.
Speaking of delusional-

Do you actually believe that the nation can go on spending at the current rate and avoid insolvency? Do you think that hyperinflation and currency devaluation are good things?

If we do not act, we will face the same fate suffered by Argentina, Chile, Zimbawe, and the Weimar Republic. By 2025 (that is not that far away), the majority of federal revenues will be devoted to servicing the debt. At that time, there will be NOTHING TO CUT and we will be faced with one of three alternatives-

1. default
2. hyperinflation
3. marked currency devaluation

To continue with the plan of the former democratic congress and Obama (spend into infinity) insures insolvency. If the US goes belly up on its debt, there will be a world wide depression.

You will have to give up your socialist entitlements at some time (we cannot afford them). It is best to do so now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,477,394 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Here we go.. Liberals now supporting the cutting of federal spending.

We can now completely abolish the Office of Management and Budget.. I wonder how much MORE this will save..

My my my, we all have short memories..

The House budget largely tracks Obama's initial proposed spending plan, with the exception of a decision to drop his $250 billion request for potential future bailouts of struggling financial institutions

Senate follows House, passes Obama budget plan - CNN

Congress very often does pass the presidents budget for the most part..
The OMB should be abolished. It was created in 1970 by a Democrat controlled Congress. The OMB began under the Department of the Treasury in 1921 as the Bureau of the Budget under the Budget and Accounting Act. FDR moved it to the Executive Office of the President in 1939.

Congress does not pass the budget that any President has proposed. If CNN is your source, you need serious help. You might want to try going to the source next time: Status of Appropriations Legislation for Fiscal Year 2011 - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,731,619 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
I have looked at it, but I don't see any major cuts
in military spending. Did I miss it, or is it not in there?
Not in there.
They'd rather do this:

"The Republicans prefer to cut small, but important social programs that make a real difference in the lives of many poor people, women, children or the elderly, instead of cutting anything from Defense Contractors.
...
While media attention focuses on the cuts to government spending demanded by House Republicans and broadly accepted by Democrats, the Pentagon is poised to reap billions more in federal funds, according to sources close to the discussions."

Budget Deal Would Give Pentagon Extra Funds In Exchange For Social Program Cuts | Lost in the 21st Century
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 01:45 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,186,917 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
The OMB should be abolished. It was created in 1970 by a Democrat controlled Congress. The OMB began under the Department of the Treasury in 1921 as the Bureau of the Budget under the Budget and Accounting Act. FDR moved it to the Executive Office of the President in 1939.
I'm not sure I agree that it should be abolished. One might be able to argue that having the President write a proposal that gets modified is better than having 2 different OMB offices, 1 for the House, 1 for the Senate..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Congress does not pass the budget that any President has proposed. If CNN is your source, you need serious help. You might want to try going to the source next time: Status of Appropriations Legislation for Fiscal Year 2011 - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
The Presidents budget was very much passed almost completely.. Dont like CNN, fine how about
FOX
Congress Passes $3.4 Trillion Budget, Boosting Obama's Agenda - FoxNews.com

NPR
Congress Passes Obama's Budget Plan : NPR

USA News and World Report
Congress Passes Obama's $3.5 Trillion Budget Along Party Lines - US News and World Report

Reuters
Congress approves budget plans, long road ahead | Reuters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,878,364 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Speaking of delusional-

Do you actually believe that the nation can go on spending at the current rate and avoid insolvency? Do you think that hyperinflation and currency devaluation are good things?

If we do not act, we will face the same fate suffered by Argentina, Chile, Zimbawe, and the Weimar Republic. By 2025 (that is not that far away), the majority of federal revenues will be devoted to servicing the debt. At that time, there will be NOTHING TO CUT and we will be faced with one of three alternatives-

1. default
2. hyperinflation
3. marked currency devaluation

To continue with the plan of the former democratic congress and Obama (spend into infinity) insures insolvency. If the US goes belly up on its debt, there will be a world wide depression.

You will have to give up your socialist entitlements at some time (we cannot afford them). It is best to do so now.
You will have to learn to read. The Deficit Commission plan calls for spending cuts in all areas. I have always agreed that has to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 01:48 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,186,917 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
You will have to learn to read. The Deficit Commission plan calls for spending cuts in all areas. I have always agreed that has to happen.
And yet you defend Obama for not making any such cuts in the budget?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,878,364 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
And yet you defend Obama for not making any such cuts in the budget?
Obama hasn't been in Congress for 2 yrs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top